Skip to main content

Proteaceae

Proteaceae Juss., Gen. Pl.: 78 (1789)

  • Chapter

Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA,volume 9)

Abstract

Perennial shrubs or trees; plants usually completely bisexual but sometimes dioecious or andromonoecious; clusters of short lateral roots (‘proteoid roots’)often produced. Leaves alternate or less commonly opposite or whorled, simple or pinnately to bipinnately or rarely palmately compound, entire or pinnately to tripinnately or rarely dichotomously dissected, often with marginal teeth, estipulate, petiolate or sessile; venation pinnate or occasionally parallel or palmate, or reduced to a single vein; stomates brachyparacytic or rarely laterocytic (in Bellendena); trichomes usually 3-celled, occasionally also glandular, rarely plants glabrous. Inflorescence simple or compound, axillary or terminal, with flowers borne laterally either singly or in pairs, rarely also with a terminal flower, racemose or raceme-like or paniculate or condensed. Flowers usually bisexual, actinomorphic or zygomorphic, hypogynous; perianth of 4 (3 in Grevillea donaldiana and 5 in a minority of flowers of Eidothea hardeniana) valvate, free or variously united tepals; stamens (3)4(5), opposite tepals, usually all fertile or sometimes 1 or more sterile; filaments partly or wholly adnate to tepals or rarely free; anthers basi fixed, usually bilocular and tetrasporangiate but occasionally the lateral anthers unilocular and bisporangiate; 1-4 hypogynous glands usually present, scale-like or fleshy, free or fused into a crescentic or annular nectary; gynoecium of 1 carpel (sometimes 2, free carpels in Grevillea banksii); ovary superior, sessile or stipitate, with variously positioned marginal placentae; style usually distinct, often with apex functioning as a pollen presenter; stigma small or sometimes relatively large and plate-like, terminal or subterminal; ovules 1 to many, anatropous to orthotropous, bitegmic, crassinucellate. Fruit dehiscent or indehiscent, a follicle, achene, drupe or drupe-like. Seeds 1 to many, sometimes winged; endosperm present or absent at maturity. A family comprising 80 genera and about 1,700 species, distributed mainly in the southern hemisphere, where it is almost completely restricted to Gondwanic continental blocks and fragments (Fig. 130). It is most diverse in Australia, followed by southern Africa, South America, New Caledonia, New Guinea, Malesia, South and East Asia, tropical Africa, Central America, Madagascar, New Zealand, Fiji, southern India, Sri Lanka, Vanuatu and Micronesia.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • APG II 2003. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askin, R.A., Baldoni, A.M. 1998. The Santonian through Paleogene record of Proteaceae in the southern South America-Antarctic Peminsula region. Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:373–390.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Auld, T.D., Denham, A.J. 1999. The role of ants and mammals in dispersal and post-dispersal seed predation of the shrubs Grevillea (Proteaceae). Pl. Ecol. 144:201–213.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, N.P., Weston, P.H., Rourke, J.P., Reeves, G. 2002. The relationships of the southern African Proteaceae as elucidated by internal transcribed spacer (ITS)DNA sequence data. Kew Bull. 57:867–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieleski, R.L., Briggs, B.G. 2005. Taxonomic patterns in the distribution of polyols within the Proteaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 53:205–217.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S., Barnes, S.H. 1995. Garsides rule and the microspore tetrads of Grevillea rosmarinifolia A. Cunnigham and Dryandra polycephala Bentham (Proteaceae). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 85:111–121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, W.J. 1985. Canopy-stored seed reserves (serotiny) in Cape Proteaceae. S. African J. Bot. 51:181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, W.J. 1988. Proteas as ‘tumbleseeds’: wind dispersal through the air and over soil. S. African J. Bot. 54:455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, W.J., Breytenbach, G.J. 1985. Ants, rodents and seed predation in Proteaceae. S. African J. Zool. 20:150–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd, L.E. 1930. The morphology and anatomy of the inflorescence and flower of the Platanaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 17:678–693.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. 1810. On the Proteaceae of Jussieu. Trans. Linn. Soc. 10:15–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R.A. 1989. Pied currawongs (Strepera graculina): their diet and role in seed dispersal in suburban Sydney, New South Wales. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 111:241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R.J. 1994. Cuticular morphology and aspects of the ecology and fossil history of North Queensland rainforest Proteaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 116:249–303.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R.J., Jordan, G.J. 1997. Early Tertiary macrofossils of Proteaceae from Tasmania. Austral. Syst. Bot. 10:533–563.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R.J., Hill, R.S., Jordan, G.J. 2005. Leaf cuticular morphology links Platanaceae and Proteaceae. Intl J. Pl. Sci. 166:843–855.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chattaway, M.M. 1948. The wood anatomy of the Proteaceae. Austral. J. Sci. Res. B, 1:279–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B.G., Rebelo, T. 1987. Pollination biology of the Proteaceae in Australia and southern Africa. Austral. J. Ecol. 12:387–422.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crous, P.W., Denman, S., Taylor, J.E., Swart, L., Palm, M.E. 2004. Cultivation and diseases of Proteaceae: Leucadendron, Leucospermum and Protea. Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmann, M.E., Jarzen, D.M. 1998. The early history of the Proteaceae in Australia: the pollen record. Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:401–438.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R.J. 2002. The diversity of scleromorphic structures in leaves of Proteaceae. Honours Thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelaker, B., Hengeler, C., Marschner, H. 1995. Distribution and function of proteoid roots and other root clusters. Bot. Acta 108:183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A.W. 1995a. Affinities. Flora of Australia 16:6–14. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A.W. 1995b. Morphological features. Flora of Australia 16:14–20. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A.W. 1996. Inflorescence and floral development of Carnarvonia (Proteaceae). Telopea 6:749–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A.W., Tucker, S.C. 1996a. Inflorescence ontogeny and floral organogenesis in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae), with emphasis on the nature of the flower pairs. Intl J. Pl. Sci. 157:341–372.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A.W., Tucker, S.C. 1996b. The developmental basis of diverse carpel orientations in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae). Intl J. Pl. Sci. 157:373–397.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A.W., Tucker, S.C. 1996c. Comparative floral ontogenies among Persoonioideae including Bellendena (Proteaceae) Amer. J. Bot. 83:1528–1555.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, S. 1990. Pollen morphology of the Embothrieae (Proteaceae) II. Embothriinae (Embothrium, Oreocallis, Telopea). Grana 29:19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldingay, R.L., Carthew, S.M. 1998. Breeding and mating systems of Australian Proteaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 46:421–437.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haber, J.M. 1960. The comparative anatomy and morphology of the flowers and inflorescences of the Proteaceae. I. Some Australian taxa. Phytomorphology 9:325–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, J.M. 1961. The comparative anatomy and morphology of the flowers and inflorescences of the Proteaceae. II. Some American taxa. Phytomorphology 11:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, J.M. 1966. The comparative anatomy and morphology of the flowers and inflorescences of the Proteaceae. III. Some African taxa. Phytomorphology 16:490–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, K.A., Bradstock, R.A., Allaway, W.G. 1998. Post-fire seed dispersal and species re-establishment in proteaceous heath. Austral. J. Bot. 46:407–419.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.S., Scriven, L.J., Jordan, G.J. 1995. The fossil record of Australian Proteaceae. Flora of Australia 16:21–30. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoot, S.B., Douglas, A.W. 1998. Phylogeny of the Proteaceae based on atpB and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer region sequences. Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:301–320.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L.A.S., Briggs, B.G. 1963. Evolution in the Proteaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 11:21–61.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L.A.S., Briggs, B.G. 1975. On the Proteaceae — the evolution and classification of a southern family. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 70:83–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G.J., Carpenter, R.J., Hill, R.S. 1998. Macrofossil evidence of past diversity of Proteaceae in Tasmania, including nine new species. Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:465–501.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G.J., Dillon, R.A., Weston, P.H. 2005. Solar radiation as a factor in the evolution of scleromorphic leaf anatomy in Proteaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 92:789–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karingal Consultants 1997. The Australian Wildflower Industry, a Review, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation, Res. Pap. no. 97/64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, P.G., Nanni, I., Thomson, G.J. 1998. Unique stigmatic structure in three genera of Proteaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 46:479–488.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, B.B., Groom, P.K. 1998. Seed and seedling biology of the woody-fruited Proteaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 46:387–406.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lanyon, J.W. 1979. The wood anatomy of three proteaceous timbers Placospermum coriaceum, Dilobuia thouarsii and Garnieria spathulaefolia. IAWA Bull. 1979, 2/3:27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.M. 1978. Studies of the family Proteaceae II. Further observations on the root morphology of some Australian genera. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria 90:251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J.C., Brits, G.J. 1993. Seed coat development in Leucospermum cordifolium (Knight) Fourcade (Proteaceae) and a clarification of the seed covering structures in Proteaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 112:139–148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mast, A.R., Givnish, T.J. 2002. Historical biogeography and the origin of stomatal distributions in Banksia and Dryandra (Proteaceae) based on their cpDNA phylogeny. Amer. J. Bot. 89:1311–1323.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, G.V. 1995. Pollinators of Australian Proteaceae. Flora of Australia 16:30–36. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netolitzky, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen-Samen. In: Linsbauer, K. (ed.) Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, X,4. Berlin: Bornträger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, S.W., Van Wyk, B.-E. 1998. Nectar sugars in Proteaceae: patterns and process. Austral. J. Bot. 46:489–504.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Orchard, A.E. 1995. Utilisation. Flora of Australia 16:37–41. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, M. 1998. The Proteaceae record in New Zealand. Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:343–372.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G.T., Plana, V., Edwards, K.S., Pennington, R.T. 2006. Proteaceae. Flora Neotropica (in press). New York Botanical Garden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, T. 1995. Sasol Proteas: a field guide to the proteas of southern Africa. Vlaeberg: Fernwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, J.P. 1998. A review of the systematics and phylogeny of the African Proteaceae. Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:267–285.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer, H. 1955. Proteaceae. Flora Malesiana ser. I, 5(2):147–206. Leiden: Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C. 1985. Flora Vitiensis Nova: A New Flora of Fiji (Spermatophytes only). Lawai: Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C., Haas, J.E. 1975. Studies of Pacific island plants XXIX. Bleasdalea and related genera of Proteaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 62:133–147.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D.E. et al. 2000. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D.E. et al. 2003. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, H.M., Douglas, A.W., Sampson, J.F. 1998. Did ‘paleopolyploidy’ really occur in Proteaceae? Austral. Syst. Bot. 11:613–629.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P.F. 2005. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohschen, B. 1986a. Contributions to the biology of useful plants 4. Anatomical studies of fruit development and fruit classification of the macadamia nut (Macadamia integrifolia Maiden and Betche.) Angew. Bot. 60:239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohschen, B. 1986b. Contributions to the biology of useful plants, 5. Anatomical studies of fruit development and fruit classification of the monkey nut (Hicksbeachia pinnatifolia F. Muell.) Angew. Bot. 60:249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohschen, B. 1986c. Contributions to the biology of useful plants, 6. Anatomical studies of fruit development and fruit classification of Persoonia pinifolia R. Br. Angew. Bot. 60:257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, W.K., Dunn, J.E., Conn, E.E. 1989. Cyanogenesis in the Proteaceae. Phytochemistry 28:821–823.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture 2004. Situation and outlook for macadamias. http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/Hort_Circular/2001/01-03/MacfeatTOC.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkata Rao, C. 1971. Proteaceae. New Delhi: Council of Scientific & Industrial Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogts, M. 1982. South Africa’s Proteaceae, know them and grow them. Cape Town: C. Struik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, K.S., Gillett, H.J. (eds) 1998. 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN, The World Conservation Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.V., Doyle, J.A. 1994. Ultrastructure and relationships of mid-Cretaceous polyforate and triporate pollen from northern Gondwana. In: Kurmann, M.H., Doyle, J.A. (eds) Ultrastructure of fossil spores and pollen. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, P.H. 1994. The Western Australian species of subtribe Persooniinae (Proteaceae: Persoonioideae: Persoonieae). Telopea 6:51–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, P.H. 1995. Gevuina. Flora of Australia 16:409–410. Collingwood: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, P.H., Barker, N.P. 2006. A new suprageneric classification of the Proteaceae, with an annotated checklist of genera. Telopea 11 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, P.H., Crisp, M.D. 1996. Trans-Pacific biogeographic patterns in the Proteaceae. In: Keast, A., Miller, S.E. (eds) The origin and evolution of Pacific island biotas, New Guinea to eastern Polynesia: patterns and processes. Amsterdam: SPB Academic, pp. 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weston, P.H. (2007). Proteaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants · Eudicots. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32219-1_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics