Skip to main content

An Approach to Safe Continuous Planning

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3371))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 395 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the “safe to act” problem, a problem associated with the safe interleaving of acting and planning. We also discuss previous research that is relevant to this problem. We then propose a specific search strategy for a general hierarchical plan-space planner that pushes portions of the emerging plan to become “execution ready” as quickly as possible. Finally, we discuss a property, critical serialisability, that is sufficient for a domain to possess in order for these portions to be “safely” executed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robocup-rescue official web page, http://www.rescuesystem.org/robocuprescue/

  2. Muscettola, N., Rajan, K., Jonsson, A., Morris, P., Smith, B.: Planning in interplanetary space: Theory and practice. In: Proceedings of the 5th AIPS, Breckenridge, CO (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bacchus, F., Yang, Q.: The downward refinement property. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, Sydney, Australia, pp. 286–292 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chien, S., Rabideau, G., Knight, R., Sherwood, R., Engelhardt, B., Muts, D., Estlin, T., Smith, B., Fisher, F., Barrett, T., Stebbins, G., Tran, D.: Aspen – automating space mission operations using automated planning and scheduling, operations. In: International Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps 2000), Toulouse, France, June 2000. European Space Agency (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen, J.: Automatic Abstraction in Planning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tenenberg, J.D., Knoblock, C.A., Yang, Q.: Characterizing abstraction hierarchies for planning. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Anaheim, CA, pp. 692–697. AAAI, Menlo Park (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fink, E., Yang, Q.: Automatically abstracting the effects of operators. In: Hendler, J. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems: Proceedings of the First International Conference (AIPS 1992), San Mateo, CA, pp. 243–251. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hookway, R.J., Oyen, R.A., Ernst, G.W., Banerji, R.B., Shaffer, D.E.: Mechanical discovery of certain heuristics. Technical Report 1136-A, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (January 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knoblock, C.A.: Automatically Generating Abstractions for Problem Solving. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knoblock, C.A.: Why plan generation and plan execution are inseparable. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Plan Execution, Cambridge, MA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korf, R.E.: Planning as search: A quantitative approach. Artificial Intelligence 33, 65–88 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Melis, E., Siekmann, J.H.: Knowledge-based proof planning. Articial Intelligence 115(1) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porteous, J., Sebastia, L.: Extracting landmarks and ordering them for planning. In: Arabnia, H.R. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ICAI, Las Vegas, NV (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sacerdoti, E.D.: Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces 5(2), 115–135 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, Q., Tenenberg, J.D.: Abtweak: Abstracting a nonlinear, least commitment planner. In: Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston MA, pp. 204–209. AAAI, Menlo Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cleveland, G., Barley, M. (2005). An Approach to Safe Continuous Planning. In: Barley, M.W., Kasabov, N. (eds) Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3371. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32128-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32128-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25340-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32128-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics