Skip to main content

Symbolic Equivalences for Open Systems

  • Conference paper
Global Computing (GC 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3267))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Behavioural equivalences on open systems are usually defined by comparing system behaviour in all environments. Due to this “universal” quantification over the possible hosting environments, such equivalences are often difficult to check in a direct way. Here, working in the setting of process calculi, we introduce a hierarchy of behavioural equivalences for open systems, building on a previously defined symbolic approach. The hierarchy comprises both branching, bisimulation-based, and non-branching, trace-based, equivalences. Symbolic equivalences are amenable to effective analysis techniques (e.g., the symbolic transition system is finitely branching under mild assumptions), which result to be sound, but often not complete due to redundant information. Two kinds of redundancy, syntactic and semantic, are discussed and and one class of symbolic equivalences is identified that deals satisfactorily with syntactic redundant transitions, which are a primary source of incompleteness.

Research supported by the Projects IST-2001-32747 Agile, IST-2001-32617 Myths and IST-2001-32530 Socs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, M., Fiore, M.P.: Computing symbolic models for verifying cryptographic protocols. In: Proc. 14th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 160–173. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aceto, L., Fokkink, W.J., Verhoef, C.: Structural operational semantics. In: Handbook of Process Algebra, pp. 197–292. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, R., Garlan, D.: A formal basis for architectural connectors. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 3(6), 213–249 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrade, L.F., Fiadeiro, J.L., Gouveia, L., Koutsoukos, G., Wermelinger, M.: Coordination for orchestration. In: Arbab, F., Talcott, C. (eds.) COORDINATION 2002. LNCS, vol. 2315, pp. 5–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldan, P., Bracciali, A., Bruni, R.: Bisimulation by unification. In: Kirchner, H., Ringeissen, C. (eds.) AMAST 2002. LNCS, vol. 2422, pp. 254–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldan, P., Bracciali, A., Bruni, R.: Symbolic equivalences for open systems. Technical Report TR-03-16, Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boreale, M.: Symbolic trace analysis of cryptographic protocols. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 667–681. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Caires, L.: A Model for Declarative Programming and Specification with Concurrency and Mobility. PhD thesis, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caires, L., Cardelli, L.: A spatial logic for concurrency. In: Kobayashi, N., Pierce, B.C. (eds.) TACS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2215, pp. 1–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Caires, L., Cardelli, L.: A spatial logic for concurrency (part II). In: Brim, L., Jančar, P., Křetínský, M., Kucera, A. (eds.) CONCUR 2002. LNCS, vol. 2421, pp. 209–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Cardelli, L., Gordon, A.D.: Mobile ambients. In: Nivat, M. (ed.) ETAPS 1998 and FOSSACS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1378, pp. 140–155. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cardelli, L., Gordon, A.D.: Anytime, anywhere. modal logics for mobile ambients. In: Proc. POPL 2000, pp. 365–377. ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, E.M., Jha, S., Marrero, W.: Using state space exploration and a natural deduction style message derivation engine to verify security protocols. In: Proc. PROCOMET 1998. Chapmann & Hall, Sydney (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cleaveland, R., Lüttgen, G.: A logical process calculus. ENTCS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Corradini, A., Montanari, U.: An algebraic semantics for structured transition systems and its application to logic programs. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 103, 51–106 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. De Nicola, R., Ferrari, G., Pugliese, R.: KLAIM: a kernel language for agents interaction and mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(5), 315–330 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Simone, R.: Higher level synchronizing devices in MEIJE–SCCS. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 37, 245–267 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiadeiro, J.L., Maibaum, T., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Pita, I.: Towards a verification logic for rewriting logic. In: Bert, D., Choppy, C., Mosses, P.D. (eds.) WADT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1827, pp. 438–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Focardi, R., Gorrieri, R.: Classification of Security Properties (Part I: Information Flow). In: Focardi, R., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2000. LNCS, vol. 2171, pp. 331–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Gadducci, F., Montanari, U.: The tile model. In: Proof, Language and Interaction: Essays in Honour of Robin Milner, pp. 133–166. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Glabbeek, R.: A complete axiomatization for branching bisimulation congruence of finite-state behaviours. In: MFCS 1993. LNCS, vol. 711, pp. 473–484. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hennessy, M., Lin, H.: Symbolic bisimulations. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 138, 353–389 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoare, C.A.R.: A model for communicating sequential processes. In: On the Construction of Programs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larsen, K.G., Thomsen, B.: A modal process logic. In: Proceedings of LICS, pp. 203–210. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Larsen, K.G., Xinxin, L.: Compositionality through an operational semantics of contexts. In: ICALP 1990. LNCS, vol. 443, pp. 526–539. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leifer, J.J., Milner, R.: Deriving bisimulation congruences for reactive systems. In: Palamidessi, C. (ed.) CONCUR 2000. LNCS, vol. 1877, pp. 243–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Milner, R.: A complete axiomatisation for observational congruence of finite-state behaviours. Information and Computation 81, 227–247 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, D., Nadathur, G.: Higher-order logic programming. In: Handbook of Logics for Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 5, pp. 499–590. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, J.: A calculus of mobile processes, I and II. Inform. and Comput. 100(1), 1–40, 41–77 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Nunziato, R.: Sviluppo dell’applicazione SEA per la verifica di sistemi aperti. Master Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa (2003) (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Plotkin, G.: A structural approach to operational semantics. Technical Report DAIMI FN-19, Aarhus University, Computer Science Department (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rensink, A.: Bisimilarity of open terms. Inform. and Comput. 156(1-2), 345–385 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Sangiorgi, D.: Expressing Mobility in Process Algebras: First-Order and Higher-Order Paradigms. PhD thesis, LFCS, University of Edinburgh, CST-99-93 (also published as ECS-LFCS-93-266) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sangiorgi, D.: A theory of bisimulation for the π-calculus. Acta Inform. 33, 69–97 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Sassone, V., Sobocinski, P.: Deriving bisimulation congruences using 2-categories. Nordic Journal of Computing 10 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sewell, P.: From rewrite rules to bisimulation congruences. In: Sangiorgi, D., de Simone, R. (eds.) CONCUR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1466, pp. 269–284. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baldan, P., Bracciali, A., Bruni, R. (2005). Symbolic Equivalences for Open Systems. In: Priami, C., Quaglia, P. (eds) Global Computing. GC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3267. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31794-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31794-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24101-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31794-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics