Advertisement

Evaluating the ILO’s Approach to Standard-Setting and Monitoring in the Field of Social Security

Conference paper
Part of the Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim book series (IMGB, volume 26)

Keywords

Social Security Supra Note Social Protection Social Security System Shadow Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 3.
    See: Jens Alber, Vom Armenhaus zum Wohlfahrtsstaat. Analysen zur Entwicklung der Sozialversicherung in Westeuropa (Campus, 1987).Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    See the different reports in: Peter A. Köhler and Hans F. Zacher (eds.), Ein Jahrhundert Sozialversicherung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Österreich und der Schweiz (Duncker & Humblot, 1981).Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    See: Ernest Mahaim, ‘The Historical and Social Importance of International Labor Legislation’, in James T. Shotwell (ed.), The Origins of the International Labor Organization (Columbia University Press, 1934), 3–19 at 3 et seq.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Note that international law was defined as ‘... the minimal law necessary to enable state-societies to act as closed systems internally and to act as territory-owners in relation to each other’ (Philipp Allott, Eunomia. New Order for a New World (Oxford University Press, 1990) at 324).Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    See: G. Tamburi, L’organisation internationale du travail et l’évolution des assurances sociales dans le monde (Bureau International du Travail, 1981); Guy Perrin, ‘Reflections on fifty years of social security’ 3 (1969) 99 International Labour Review 249—293.Google Scholar
  6. 20.
    See the Santiago Resolution (published as a part of the Inter-American Social Insurance Code): ILO, The International Labour Code (ILO, 1952) 664 at 666.Google Scholar
  7. 21.
    Guy Perrin, supra note 10.Google Scholar
  8. 23.
    ILO, Approaches to social security: An international survey. Studies and Reports, Series M (Social insurance) No. 18 (ILO, 1942) at 80.Google Scholar
  9. 24.
    Sir William Beveridge, Social insurance and allied services. Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty November 1942 (H. M. Stationary Off., 1969).Google Scholar
  10. 25.
    Guy Perrin, ‘The recognition of the right to social protection as a human right’ 2 (1985) 10 Labour and Society 239–258.Google Scholar
  11. 26.
    Albrecht Otting, ‘International labour standards: A framework for social security’, 2 (1993) 132 International Labour Review 163–171; Alec L. Parrott,’ social security: Does the wartime dream have to become a peacetime nightmare?’ 3 (1992) 131 International Labour Review 367–386; Guy Perrin, supra note 10.Google Scholar
  12. 27.
    Nicolas Valticos, Droit international du travail (Dalloz, 1983) at 391 et seq.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    ILO, Social security. A new consensus (ILO, 2001); ILO, Social security: Issues, challenges and prospects (International Labour Conference, 89th session, 2001).Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    ILO, Resolution and Conclusions concerning social security (International Labour Conference, 89th Session, 2001).Google Scholar
  15. 32.
    See the critical analysis of Philip Alston, “Core Labour Standards’ and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime’ 3 (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 457–521; see also the view of the supporters of core labour standards: Brian A. Langille, ‘Core Labour Rights — The True Story (Reply to Alston)’ 3 (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 437–464, Francis Maupain, ‘Revitalization Not Retreat: The Real Potential of the 1998 ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers’ Rights’ 3 (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 33.
    Inter-States complaints within the ILO were for example based on Convention No. 105 and Convention No. 29; see: Nicolas Valticos and Gerard Potobsky, International Labour Law (Kluwer law and Taxation, 1995) at 290 et seq.Google Scholar
  17. 34.
    See: Report of the Committee set up to examine the representation submitted by the National Trade Union Co-ordination Council (CNS) of Chile under article 24 of the ILO Constitution, alleging non-observance by Chile of international labour Conventions Nos. 1, 2, 24, 29, 30, 35, 37, 38 and 111; Vol. LXXI, 1988, Series B, Supplement 1.Google Scholar
  18. 36.
    For a general overview of the different approaches in defining compliance with treaty obligations in international social law, see: Angelika Nußberger, Sozialstandards im Völkerrecht. Eine Studie zu Entwicklung und Bedeutung der Normsetzung der Vereinten Nationen, der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation und des Europarats zu Fragen des Sozialschutzes (Duncker & Humblot, 2005) at 284 et seq.Google Scholar
  19. 37.
    See the different reports in: Eckart Klein (ed.), The Monitoring System of Human Rights Treaty Obligations (Berlin-Verl. Spitz, 1998).Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    Alfred Wisskirchen, ‘Die normensetzende und normenüberwachende Tätigkeit der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation (IAO)’ 4 (2003) 34 Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 691–733.Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    See: Ernest Alfred Landy, The Effectiveness of International Supervision. Thirty Years of I.L.O. Experience (Stevens & Sons oceana publications, 1966).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CologneCologne

Personalised recommendations