Calyceraceae R. Br. ex Rich., Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. 6: 74 (1820), nom. cons.
  • F. H. Hellwig
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 8)


Pollen Morphology Corolla Tube Calyx Lobe Wood Anatomy Falkland Island 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Albach, D.C., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of Asterids based on sequences of four genes. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88:163–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avetisjan, E.M. 1980. Pollen morphology of the family Calyceraceae (in Russian). In: Sistematika i Évolyutsiya Vysshikh Rastenii. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  3. Baillon, H. 1880. Histoire des plantes, VII. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  4. Bohm, B.A., Reid, A., DeVore, M., Stuessy, T.F. 1995. Flavonoid chemistry of Calyceraceae. Canad. J. Bot. 73: 1962–1965.Google Scholar
  5. Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae. Cladistics and classification. Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bremer, K., Backlund, A., Sennblad, B., Swenson, U., Andreasen, K., Hjertson, M., Lundberg, J., Backlund, M., Bremer, B. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level morphological synapomorphies. Pl. Syst. Evol. 229: 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, R. 1817. Observations on the natural family of plants called Compositae. Trans. Linn. Soc. 12: 76–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capasso, A., Urruñaga, R., Garofala, L. et al. 1996. Phytochemical and pharmacological studies on the medical herb Acicarpha tribuloides. Intl J. Pharmacog. 34. 255–261.Google Scholar
  9. Carlquist, S., DeVore, M.L. 1998. Wood anatomy of Calyceraceae with reference to ecology, habit, and systematic relationships. Aliso 17: 63–76.Google Scholar
  10. Cassini, H. 1817. Boopidées (Bot.). Dict. Sci. Nat. suppl. 5: 26–28.Google Scholar
  11. Cavanilles, A.J. 1797. Icones et descriptiones plantarum, IV. Matriti: Regia Typographia.Google Scholar
  12. Chiapella, J. 1999. Calyceraceae. In: Correa, M.N. (ed.) Flora Patagonica, VI. Buenos Aires: Colección científica del INTA, pp. 492–517.Google Scholar
  13. Cosner, M.E., Jansen, R.K., Lammers, T.G. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships in the Campanulales based on rbcL sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 190: 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dahlgren, O. 1915. Über die Embryologie von Acicarpha tribuloides Juss. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 9: 184–191.Google Scholar
  16. Dahlgren, G. 1989. The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of dicotyledons. In: Tan, K. (ed.) The Davis and Hedge Festschrift. Edinburgh: University Press, pp. 249–260.Google Scholar
  17. DeVore, M. 1991. The occurrence of Acicarpha tribuloides (Calyceraceae) in eastern North America. Rhodora 93: 26–35.Google Scholar
  18. DeVore, M. 1994. Systematic studies of Calyceraceae. Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  19. DeVore, M., Stuessy, T.F. 1995. The place and time of origin of the Asteraceae, with additional comments on the Calyceraceae and Goodeniaceae. In: Hind, D.J.N., Jeffrey, C., Pope, G.V. (eds) Advances in Compositae systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
  20. Erbar, C. 1993. Studies on the floral development and pollen presentation in Acicarpha tribuloides with a discussion of the systematic position of the family Calyceraceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 115: 325–350.Google Scholar
  21. Gibbs, R.D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants, vol. 2. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gustafsson, M.H.G. 1995. Petal venation in the Asterales and related orders. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gustafsson, M.H.G. 1996. Phylogenetic hypotheses for Asteraceae relationships. In: Hind, D.J.N., Beentje, H.J. (eds) Compositae: systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar
  24. Gustafsson, M.H.G., Bremer, K. 1995. Morphology and phylogenetic interrelationships of the Asteraceae, Calyceraceae, Campanulaceae, Goodeniaceae and related families (Asterales). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gustafsson, M.H.G., Backlund, A., Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogeny of the Asterales sesu lato based on rbcL sequences with particular reference to the Goodeniaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 199: 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen, H.V. 1992. Studies in the Calyceraceae with a discussion of its relationship to Compositae. Nordic J. Bot. 12: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heusser, C.J. 1971. Pollen and spores of Chile. Tucson, AR: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jensen, S.R., Nielsen, B.J., Dahlgren, R. 1975. Iridoid compounds, their occurrence and systematic importance in angiosperms. Bot. Notiser 128: 148–180.Google Scholar
  29. Jensen, S.R., Lyse-Pedersen, S.E., Nielsen, B.J. 1979. Novel bis-iridoid glucosides from Dipsacus sylvestris. Phytochemistry 18: 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jussieu, A.L. 1803. Mémoire sur l’Acicarpha et le Boopis, deux genres nouveaux de plantes de la famille des Cinarocéphales. Ann. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. 2: 345–350.Google Scholar
  31. Leins, P., Erbar, C. 1990. On the mechanisms of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales-Asterales-complex. Bot. Acta 103: 87–92.Google Scholar
  32. Lundberg, J., Bremer, K. 2003. A phylogenetic study of the order Asterales using one morphological and three molecular data sets. Intl J. Pl. Sci. 164: 553–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mabry, T.J., Bohlmann, F. 1977. Summary of the chemistry of the Compositae. In: Heywood, V.H., Harborne, J.B., Turner, B.L. (eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae, I. London: Academic Press, pp. 1097–1104.Google Scholar
  34. Markgraf, V., D’Antoni, H.L. 1978. Pollen flora of Argentina. Tucson, AR: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  35. Marticorena, C., Quezada, M. 1985. Catálogo de la flora vascular de Chile. Gayana (Bot.) 42: 5–157.Google Scholar
  36. Martius, C.F.P. 1878. Flora Brasiliensis, vol. 6. London: Lovell Reeve.Google Scholar
  37. Miers, J. 1870. Contributions to Botany, II. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, D.M. 1993. Calyceraceae. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) Flowering plants of the world. London: B.T. Bastford.Google Scholar
  39. Pontiroli, A. 1963. Flora Argentina, Calyceraceae. Revista Mus. La Plata 9, Bot. 41: 175–214.Google Scholar
  40. Reiche, K. 1901. Beiträge zur Systematik der Calyceraceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 29: 107–119.Google Scholar
  41. Richard, L.C. 1820. Mémoire sur une famille de plantes, dites les Calycérées. Mém. Hist. Nat. 6: 28–82.Google Scholar
  42. Ruiz, H., Pavón, J. 1798. Systema vegetabilium florae peruvianae et chiliensis. Madrid: Gabrielis de Sancha.Google Scholar
  43. Skvarla, J.J., Turner, B.L., Patel, V.C., Tomb, A.S. 1977. Pollen morphology in the Compositae and in morphologically related families. In: Heywood, V.H., Harborne, J.B., Turner, B.L. (eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae, I. London: Academic Press, pp. 141–248.Google Scholar
  44. Stebbins, L. 1977. Development and comparative anatomy of the Compositae. In: Heywood, V.H., Harborne, J.B., Turner, B.L. (eds) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae, I. London: Academic Press, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
  45. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Hellwig
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Spezielle Botanik mit Botanischem Garten und Herbarium HaussknechtFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations