Advertisement

Asterales: Introduction and Conspectus

  • J. W. Kadereit
Chapter
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 8)

Keywords

Ellagic Acid Corolla Tube Corolla Lobe rbcL Sequence Endosperm Haustorium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albach, D.C., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of Asterids based on sequences of four genes. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 163–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APG II 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backlund, A., Bremer, B. 1997. Phylogeny of the Asteridae s.str. based on rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Dipsacales. Pl. Syst. Evol. 207: 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae. Cladistics and classification. Portland, OR: Timber Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bremer, K., Gustafsson, M.H.G. 1997. East Gondwanan ancestry of the sunflower alliance of families. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 9188–9190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremer, K., Backlund, A., Sennblad, B., Swenson, U., Andreasen, K., Hjertson, M., Lundberg, J., Backlund, M., Bremer, B. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level morphological synapomorphies. Pl. Syst. Evol. 229: 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bremer, B., Bremer, K., Heidari, N., Olmstead, R.G., Anderberg, A.A., Källersjö, M., Barkhordarian, E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 24: 274–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bremer, K., Friis, E.-M., Bremer, B. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic dating of Asterid flowering plants shows early Cretaceous diversification. Syst. Biol. 53: 496–505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlquist, S., De Vore, M.L. 1998. Wood anatomy of Calyceraceae with reference to ecology, habit, and systematic relationships. Aliso 17: 63–76.Google Scholar
  10. Carolin, R.C. 1960. The structures involved in the presentation of pollen to visiting insects in the order Campanulales. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 85: 197–207.Google Scholar
  11. Chase, M.W. et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rcbL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cosner, M.E., Jansen, R.K., Lammers, T.G. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships in the Campanulales based on rbcL sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 190: 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronquist, A. 1977. The Compositae revisited. Brittonia 29: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Downie, S.R., Palmer, J.D. 1992. Restriction site mapping of the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat: a molecular phylogeny of the Asteridae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erbar, C., Leins, P. 1995. Portioned pollen release and the syndromes of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales—Asterales-complex. Flora 190: 323–338.Google Scholar
  17. Gustafsson, M.H.G. 1995. Petal venation in Asterales and related orders. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustafsson, M.H.G., Bremer, K. 1995. Morphology and phylogenetic interrelationships of the Asteraceae, Calyceraceae, Campanulaceae, Goodeniaceae, and related families (Asterales). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gustafsson, M.H.G., Bremer, K. 1997. The circumscription and systematic position of Carpodetaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 10: 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gustafsson, M.H.G., Backlund, A., Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogeny of the Asterales sensu lato based on rbcL sequences with particular reference to the Goodeniaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 199: 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, H.V. 1992. Studies in the Calyceraceae with a discussion of its relationships to Compositae. Nordic J. Bot. 12: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inoue, N., Tobe, H. 1999. Integumentary studies in Menyanthaceae (Campanulales sensu lato). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 50: 75–79.Google Scholar
  23. Jansen, R.K., Kim, K.-J. 1996. Implications of chloroplast DNA data for the classification and phylogeny of the Asteraceae. In: Hind, D.J.N., Beentje, H.J. (eds) Compositae: systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994, vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp. 317–339.Google Scholar
  24. Källersjö, M., Farris, J.S., Chase, M.W., Bremer, B., Fay, M.F., Humphries, C.J., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Bremer, K. 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants. Pl. Syst. Evol. 213: 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kapil, R.N., Bhatnagar, A.K. 1992. Embryology and systematic position of Corokia A. Cunn. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Embryology and Seed Reproduction, Leningrad, 1990. St. Petersburg: Nauka, pp. 246–247.Google Scholar
  26. Kårehed, J., Lundberg, J., Bremer, B., Bremer, K. 1999. Evolution of the Australasian families Alseuosmiaceae, Argophyllaceae, and Phellinaceae. Syst. Bot. 24: 660–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lammers, T.G. 1992. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Campanulales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 388–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leins, P., Erbar, C. 1990. On the mechanisms of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales-Asterales-complex. Bot. Acta 103: 87–92.Google Scholar
  29. Leins, P., Erbar, C. 2003. The pollen box in Cyphiaceae (Campanulales). Intl J. Pl. Sci. 164suppl. 5: S321–S328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundberg, J. 2001. The asteralean affinity of the Mauritian Roussea (Roussaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 137: 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundberg, J., Bremer, K. 2003. A phylogenetic study of the order Asterales using one morphological and three molecular data sets. Intl J. Pl. Sci. 164: 553–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magallón, S., Sanderson, M.J. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55: 1762–1780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Magallón, S., Crane, P.R., Herendeen, P.S. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity and diversification of eudicots. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 297–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgan, D.R., Soltis, D.E. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olmstead, R.G., Michaels, H.J., Scott, K.M., Palmer, J.D. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olmstead, R.G., Kim, K.-J., Jansen, R.K., Wagstaff, S.J. 2000. The phylogeny of the Asteridae sensu lato based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 16: 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., Soltis, D.E., Bayer, C., Fay, M.F., De Bruijn, A.Y., Sullivan, S., Qiu, Y.-L. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savolainen, V., Fay, M.F., Albach, D.C., Backlund, A., van der Bank, M., Cameron, K.M., Johnson, S.A., Lledo, M.D., Pintaud, J.-C., Powell, M., Sheahan, M.C., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Weston, P., Whitten, W.M., Wurdack, K.J., Chase, M.W. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull. 55: 357–309.Google Scholar
  39. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S.M., Prince, L.M., Kress, W.J., Nixon, K.C., Farris, J.S. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 381–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevens, P.F. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny website, version 5, May 2004 (and more or less continuously updated since). http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/Google Scholar
  41. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Thorne, R.F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365–389.Google Scholar
  43. Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. Roy. Soc. London ser. B 268: 2211–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zdero, C., Bohlmann, F. 1990. Systematics and evolution within the Compositae, seenwith the eyes of a chemist. Pl. Syst. Evol. 171: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Kadereit
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer GartenJohannes Gutenberg-UniversitätMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations