The Biochemistry and Mechanics of Gastropod Adhesive Gels

  • Andrew M. Smith


Adhesive Strength Land Snail Hybrid Hydrogel Extended Configuration Glue Protein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnhart MC (1983) Gas permeability of the epiphragm of a terrestrial snail, Otala lactea. Physiol Zool 56:436–444.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Zion O, Nussinovitch A (1997) Hydrocolloid wet glues. Food Hydrocolloids 11:429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bingham FO (1972) The mucus holdfast of Littorina irrorata and its relationship to relative humidity and salinity. Veliger 15:48–50.Google Scholar
  4. Bikerman JJ (1958) The rheology of adhesion. In: Eirich FR (ed) Rheology: theory and applications, vol III. Academic Press, New York, pp 479–503.Google Scholar
  5. Branch GM, Marsh AC (1978) Tenacity and shell shape in six Patella species: adaptive features. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 34:111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campion M (1961) The structure and function of the cutaneous glands in Helix aspersa. Quart J Microscop Sci 102:195–216.Google Scholar
  7. Davies MS, Hawkins SJ (1998) Mucus from marine molluscs. Adv Mar Biol 34:1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. deGennes PG, Leger L (1982) Dynamics of entangled polymer gels. Annu Rev Phys Chem 33:49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denny MW (1983) Molecular biomechanics of molluscan mucous secretions. In: Wilbur K, Simkiss K, Hochachka PW (eds) The mollusca, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 431–465.Google Scholar
  10. Denny MW (1984) Mechanical properties of pedal mucus and their consequences for gastropod structure and performance. Am Zool 24:23–36.Google Scholar
  11. Denny MW, Gosline JM (1980) The physical properties of the pedal mucus of the terrestrial slug Ariolimax columbianus. J Exp Biol 88:375–393.Google Scholar
  12. Doi M, Edwards SF (1988) The theory of polymer dynamics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Eagland D (1990) What makes stuff stick? Chemtech (April):248–254.Google Scholar
  14. Flammang P (1996) Adhesion in echinoderms. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence JM (eds) Echinoderm studies, vol 5. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–60.Google Scholar
  15. Gay C (2002) Stickiness -some fundamentals of adhesion. Integr Comp Biol 42:1123–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grenon JF, Walker G (1980) Biomechanical and rheological properties of the pedal mucus of the limpet, Patella vulgata L. Comp Biochem Physiol B 66:451–458.Google Scholar
  17. Grenon JF, Walker G (1981) The tenacity of the limpet, Patella vulgata L.: an experimental approach. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 54:277–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hahn T, Denny M (1989) Tenacity-mediated selective predation by oystercatchers on intertidal limpets and its role in maintaining habitat partitioning by ‘Collisella’ scabra and Lottia digitalis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 53:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermans CO (1983) The duo-gland adhesive system. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 21:283–339.Google Scholar
  20. Hu BH, Messersmith PB (2003) Rational design of transglutaminase substrate peptides for rapid enzymatic formation of hydrogels. J Am Chem Soc 125:14298–14299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee BP, Dalsin JL, Messersmith PB (2002) Synthesis and gelation of DOPA-modified poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 3:1038–1047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee BP, Huang K, Nunalee FN, Shull KR, Messersmith PB (2004) Synthesis of 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) containing monomers and their co-polymerization with PEG-diacrylate to form hydrogels. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 15:449–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mair J, Port GR (2002) The influence of mucus production by the slug, Deroceras reticulatum, on predation by Pterostichus madidus and Nebria brevicollis (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 12:325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miyata T, Asami N, Uragami T (1999) A reversibly antigen-responsive hydrogel. Nature 399:766–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nowak AP, Breedveld V, Pakstis L, Ozbas B, Pine DJ, Pochan D, Deming TJ (2002) Rapidly recovering hydrogel scaffolds from self-assembling diblock copolypeptide amphiphiles. Nature 417:424–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pawlicki JM, Pease LB, Pierce CM, Startz TP, Zhang Y, Smith AM (2004) The effect of molluscan glue proteins on gel mechanics. J Exp Biol 207:1127–1135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petka WA, Harden JL, McGrath KP, Wirtz D, Tirrell DA (1998) Reversible hydrogels from self-assembling artificial proteins. Science 281:389–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips GO, Williams PA (2000) Handbook of hydrocolloids. Woodhead Publ, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Smith AM (1991a) Negative pressure generated by octopus suckers: a study of the tensile strength of water in nature. J Exp Biol 157:257–271.Google Scholar
  30. Smith AM (1991b) The role of suction in the adhesion of limpets. J Exp Biol 161:151–169.Google Scholar
  31. Smith AM (1992) Alternation between attachment mechanisms by limpets in the field. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 160:205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith AM (2002) The structure and function of adhesive gels from invertebrates. Integr Comp Biol 42:1164–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith AM, Morin MC (2002) Biochemical differences between trail mucus and adhesive mucus from marsh periwinkles. Biol Bull 203:338–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith AM, Quick TJ, St. Peter RL (1999) Differences in the composition of adhesive and non-adhesive mucus from the limpet Lottia limatula. Biol Bull 196:34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanaka T (1981) Gels. Sci Am 244:124–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaughn CC, Fisher FM (1988) Vertical migration as a refuge from predation in intertidal marsh snails: a field test. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 123:163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM (1976) Mechanical design in organisms. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  38. Waite JH (1983) Adhesion in bysally attached bivalves. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 58:209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Waite JH, Andersen NH, Jewhurst S, Sun C (2005) Mussel adhesion: finding the tricks worth mimicking. J Adhesion 81:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wake WC (1982) Adhesion and the formulation of adhesives. Applied Science Publ, London.Google Scholar
  41. Wang C, Stewart RJ, Kopeˇcek J (1999) Hybrid hydrogels assembled from synthetic polymers and coiled-coil protein domains. Nature 397:417–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang C, Kopeˇcek J, Stewart RJ (2001) Hybrid hydrogels cross-linked by genetically engineered coiled-coil block proteins. Biomacromolecules 2:912–920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warren JH (1985) Climbing as an avoidance behaviour in the salt marsh periwinkle, Littorina irrorata (Say). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 89:11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wells GP (1944) The water relations of snails and slugs III. Factors determining activity in Helix pomatia L. J Exp Biol 20:79–87.Google Scholar
  45. Williams PA, Phillips GO (2000) Introduction to food hydrocolloids. In: Phillips GO, Williams PA (eds) Handbook of hydrocolloids. Woodhead Publ, Cambridge, pp 1–20.Google Scholar
  46. Yule AB, Walker G (1987) Adhesion in barnacles. In: Southward AJ (ed) Crustacean issues: barnacle biology, vol 5. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 389–402.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew M. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyIthaca CollegeIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations