Skip to main content

Resolving Architectural Mismatches of COTS Through Architectural Reconciliation

  • Conference paper
COTS-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3412))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The integration of COTS components into a system under development entails architectural mismatches. These have been tackled, so far, at the component level, through component adaptation techniques, but they also must be tackled at an architectural level of abstraction. In this paper we propose an approach for resolving architectural mismatches, with the aid of architectural reconciliation. The approach consists of designing and subsequently reconciling two architectural models, one that is forward-engineered from the requirements and another that is reverse-engineered from the COTS-based implementation. The final reconciled model is optimally adapted both to the requirements and to the actual COTS-based implementation. The contribution of this paper lies in the application of architectural reconciliation in the context of COTS-based software development. Architectural modeling is based upon the UML 2.0 standard, while the reconciliation is performed by transforming the two models, with the help of architectural design decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, C., Brownsword, L.: Evolutionary Process for Integrating COTS-Based Systems (EPIC). SEI Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-005. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avgeriou, P., Guelfi, N., Perrouin, G.: Evolution Through Architectural Reconciliation. In: Workshop on Software Evolution Through Transformations (SETra) 2004, Rome, Italy. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch, J.: Superimposition: A component adaptation technique. Information and Software Technology 41, 257–273 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch, J.: Design and Use of Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Clein, M.: Evaluating Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganesha web site, http://www.anemalab.org/ganesha/

  8. Garlan, D., Allen, R., Ockerbloom, J.: Architectural Mismatch: or Why It’s Hard to Build Systems Out of Existing Parts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, Seattle (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grunbacher, P., Egyed, A., Medvidovic, N.: Reconciling Software Requirements and Architectures with Intermediate Models. Journal of Software and Systems Modeling (So-SyM),(to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guelfi, N., Ries, B., Sterges, P.: MEDAL: A CASE Tool Extension for Model-driven Software Engineering. In: SwSTE 2003, IEEE International Conference on Software - Science, Technology & Engineering, Hertzeliyah, Israel (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, G.Y., Atlee, J.M., Kazman, R.: A Software Architecture Reconstruction Method. WICSA-1, San Antonio (February 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heineman, G.: A model for designing adaptable software components. In: Twenty-second International Conference on Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Vienna, Austria, August 1998, pp. 121–127 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE, Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, IEEE std. 1471-2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keller, R., Hölze, U.: Binary component adaptation, Technical report TRCS97-20, University of California, Santa Barbara (December 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Lopes, C., Maeda, C., Mendhekar, A., Murphy, G.: Open implementation design guidelines. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, May 17-23, pp. 481–490 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kruchten, P.: The 4+1 view model of architecture. IEEE Software (November 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(1), 70–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Medvidovic, N., Egyed, A., Gruenbacher, P.: Stemming Architectural Erosion by Coupling Architectural Discovery and Recovery. In: Proceedings of the Second International Requirements to Architecture Workshop (STRAW 2003), Portland, Oregon, May 3-11 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mikic-Rakic, M., Mehta, N.R., Medvidovic, N.: Architectural Style Requirements for Self-Healing Systems. In: 1st Workshop on Self-Healing Systems, Charleston (November 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perry, D.E., Wolf, A.L.: Foundations for the Study of Software Architectures. Software Engineering Notes (October 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Portable Bookshelf website, http://www.swag.uwaterloo.ca/pbs/

  23. SHriMP web site, http://shrimp.cs.uvic.ca/

  24. Szyperski, C.: Component Software – Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tran, J., Holt., R.: Forward and Reverse Architecture Repair. In: Proc. of CASCON 1999, Toronto, November 1999, pp. 15–24 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tran, J., Godfrey, M., Lee, E., Holt, R.: Architecture repair of open source software. In: Proc. of 2000 Intl. Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC 2000), Limerick, Ireland (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tzerpos, V., Holt, R.C.: A Hybrid Process for Recovering Software Architecture. In: CASCON 1996, Toronto (November 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tu, Q., Godfrey, M.: An Integrated Approach for Studying Software Architectural Evolution. In: Proc. of 2002 Intl. Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC 2002), Paris (June 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Welch, I., Stroud, R.: Adaptation of connectors in software architectures. In: Third International Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming, Brussels, Belgium (July 1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Avgeriou, P., Guelfi, N. (2005). Resolving Architectural Mismatches of COTS Through Architectural Reconciliation. In: Franch, X., Port, D. (eds) COTS-Based Software Systems. ICCBSS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3412. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24548-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30587-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics