Skip to main content

On Goal-Oriented COTS Taxonomies Construction

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNPSE,volume 3412)

Abstract

This paper proposes the adoption of a goal-based method called GBRAM for facilitating the process of building taxonomies of COTS components. Since GBRAM was defined in a different setting, the main result of the paper is to adapt it to this new context obtaining the GBTCM method. We show how the different activities and artifacts of GBRAM change, and we apply the proposal to obtain a taxonomy for requirements engineering oriented tools.

Keywords

  • Requirement Engineer
  • Requirement Engineer
  • Requirement Elicitation
  • Characterization Attribute
  • Auxiliary Model

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This work is partially supported by the Spanish research program CICYT TIC2001-2165.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carney, D., Long, F.: What Do You Mean by COTS? Finally a Useful Answer. IEEE Software 17(2) (March-April 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Craig Meyers, B., Oberndorf, P.: Managing Software Acquisition. SEI Series in Software Engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., Quer, C., Torchiano, M.: Characterization of a Taxonomy for Business Applications and the Relationships Among Them. In: Kazman, R., Port, D. (eds.) ICCBSS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2959, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Morisio, M., Torchiano, M.: Definition and Classification of COTS: A Proposal. In: Proceedings 1st. International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS), Orlando Florida (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Yu, E.: From Object-Oriented to Goal-Oriented Requirements Análisis. Communications ACM 42(1) (January 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour. In: Proceedings 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, ISRE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Antón, A.I.: Goal-Based Requirements Analysis. In: Proceedings 2nd IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, ICRE (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. UML 2.0 Specifications last accesed (July 2004), http://www.uml.org/

  9. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., Quer, C.: Defining a Quality Model for Mail Servers. In: Erdogmus, H., Weng, T. (eds.) ICCBSS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2580, pp. 51–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu, E.: Towards Modeling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering. In: Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, ISRE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Standish Group Report CHAOS Survey (1994), http://www.standishgroup.com

  12. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, SWEBOK, http://www.swebok.org

  13. The Gartner Group, available on-line at http://www4.gartner.com

  14. INCOSE. Software Engineering Tools Taxonomy, http://www.incose.org

  15. eCots. Software Components Open Directory Project, http://ecots.org

  16. International Standard ISO/IEC 12207 Software Life Cycle Processes (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IEEE/EIA Guide. IEEE/EIA12207.1-1997. Standard for Information Technology-Software Life Cicle Processes (April 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. International Standard IEEE Std 830-1998 IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications (June 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Infrastructure Software Market Definitions for Application Development. Gartner, Dataquest Guide. (June 4, 2003), http://www.gartner.com

  20. Software Market Research Methodology and Definitions 2003-2004. Gartner Dataquest Guide. (January 16, 2004), http://www.gartner.com

  21. CBSE Net. “Application Domain Taxonomy ”. Available on-line (previous registration) at: http://www.cbsenet.org/pls/CBSEnet/eco_ricerca_documenti.concept_search_frame

  22. International Data Corporation, http://www.idc.com

  23. ComponenSource, http://www.componentsource.com

  24. Potts, C., Takahashi, K., Antón, A.: Inquiry-Based Requirements Analysis. IEEE Software 11(2) (March 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ayala, C.P, Botella, P., Franch, X.: Goal-Based Reasoned Construction of Taxonomies for the Selection of COTS Products. In: Proceedings 8th Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI), Orlando Florida (2004) ISBN:980-6560-13-2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ayala, C.P., Botella, P., Franch, X. (2005). On Goal-Oriented COTS Taxonomies Construction. In: Franch, X., Port, D. (eds) COTS-Based Software Systems. ICCBSS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3412. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24548-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30587-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics