Skip to main content

Resolving COTS System Assessment Clashes

  • Conference paper
  • 595 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNPSE,volume 3412)

Abstract

COTS significantly complicates the IV&V process. The necessarily pessimistic culture of IV&V has a perspective on which COTS assessment attributes and techniques are relevant that differs greatly from developer’s typically optimistic, success-oriented perspective. There is no basis to assume that the COTS assessments made by developers will ultimately be consistent with IV&V COTS assessments. The result frequently results in a “lose-lose” situation where either large re-work costs are incurred to replace existing COTS with IV&V approved COTS, or higher risk and uncertainty must be tolerated (from the IV&V perspective) to continue with the COTS the developers chose. This work seeks to remedy this “culture clash” of COTS assessment perspectives by integrating IV&V and developers system level COTS assessments that provides a result that is both consistent and cost-effective.

Keywords

  • Model Check
  • Developer Assessment
  • Safety Critical System
  • Assessment Effort
  • Assessment Step

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rahmatipour, M.: IV&V of COTS RTOS for Space Flight Project, The 1st NASA OSMA SAS (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. RTCA Inc., Final Report for Clarification of DO-178B Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, Washington, D.C. RTCA/DO-248B, October 12 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brower, G.: Validation of Commercial Off the Shelf Software. Journal of Validation Technology (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohl, R.: IV&V of COTS Dormant Cord: Challenge and Issues, GSAW (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abts, C., Boehm, B., Bailey Clark, E.: COCOTS: A Software COTS-Based System (CBS) Cost Model. In: Proceedings, ESCOM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Port, D., Chen, S.: Assessing COTS Assessment: How much is enough? In: Proceedings, ICCBSS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boehm, B.: Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices. IEEE Software (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Port, D., Nakao, H., Nomoto, H., Mamiya, H., Katahira, M. (2005). Resolving COTS System Assessment Clashes. In: Franch, X., Port, D. (eds) COTS-Based Software Systems. ICCBSS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3412. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30587-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24548-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30587-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics