Skip to main content

Customisable Semantic Analysis of Texts

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3406))

  • 2222 Accesses

Abstract

Our customisable semantic analysis system implements a form of knowledge acquisition. It automatically extracts syntactic units from a text and semi-automatically assigns semantic information to pairs of units. The user can select the type of units of interest and the list of semantic relations to be assigned. The system examines parse trees to decide if there is interaction between concepts that underlie syntactic units. Memory-based learning proposes the most likely semantic relation for each new pair of syntactic units that may be semantically linked. We experiment with several configurations, varying the syntactic analyzer and the list of semantic relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, K., Delisle, S., Szpakowicz, S.: Test-driving TANKA: Evaluating a semi-automatic system of text analysis for knowledge acquisition. In: Canadian AI, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 60–71 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: COLING-ACL, Montreal, Canada, pp. 86–90 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosario, B., Hearst, M.: Classifying the semantic relations in noun-compounds via a domain specific hierarchy. In: EMNLP, Pittsburg, PA, USA, pp. 82–90 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez, F.: A representation of complex events and processes for the acquisition of knowledge from text. Kowledge-Based Systems 10, 237–251 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fillmore, C., Atkins, B.T.: FrameNet and lexicographic relevance. In: LREC, Granada, Spain (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gildea, D., Jurafsky, D.: Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 28, 245–288 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hull, R.D., Gomez, F.: Semantic interpretation of nominalizations. In: 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 1062–1068 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosario, B., Hearst, M., Fillmore, C.: The descent of hierarchy and selection in relational semantics. In: ACL, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, P., Porter, B.: Building concept reprezentations from reusable components. In: AAAI, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 367–376 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fan, J., Barker, K., Porter, B., Clark, P.: Representing roles and purpose. In: KCAP, pp. 38–43 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barker, K.: Semi-Automatic Recognition of Semantic Relationships in English Technical Texts. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa, Department of Computer Science (1998), http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kbarker/thesis

  12. Kilgarriff, A., Tugwell, D.: WORD SKETCH: Extraction and display of significant collocations for lexicography. In: Workshop on Collocation: Computational Extraction, Analysis and Exploitation, 39th ACL & 10th EACL, Toulouse, France, pp. 32–38 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Concept discovery from text. In: COLING, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 577–583 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pantel, P., Lin, D.: Discovering word senses from text. In: SIGKDD, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 613–619 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daelemans, W., van den Bosch, A., Zavrel, J.: Forgetting exceptions is harmful in language learning. Machine Learning 34, 11–34 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Delisle, S., Copeck, T., Szpakowicz, S., Barker, K.: Pattern matching for case analysis: A computational definition of closeness. In: ICCI, Sudbury, ON, Canada, pp. 310–315 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Larrick, N.: Junior Science Book of Rain, Hail, Sleet and Snow. Garrard Publishing Company, Champaign (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delisle, S., Szpakowicz, S.: Realistic parsing: Practical solutions of difficult problems. In: PACLING, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Temperley, D., Sleator, D., Lafferty, J.: The LINK parser (1998), http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link

  20. Chanod, J.P., Ait-Mokhtar, S., Roux, C.: Xerox Incremental Parser, ongoing research. Xerox Research Centre Europe (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nastase, V., Szpakowicz, S.: Exploring noun-modifier semantic relations. In: International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tillburg, Netherlands (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nastase, V., Szpakowicz, S. (2005). Customisable Semantic Analysis of Texts. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3406. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30586-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30586-6_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24523-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30586-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics