Advertisement

Modelling Context: An Activity Theory Approach

  • Manasawee Kaenampornpan
  • Eamonn O’Neill
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3295)

Abstract

In this paper, we review different context classification systems that have been used to define elements of context. Although existing classification systems cover various types of context, in the development of context aware applications, only a few types of context have been used. In this work, we aim to build a context classification model based on Activity Theory that provides a basis both for dialogue amongst context awareness researchers and for the implementation of a context awareness architecture.

Keywords

Activity Theory Modelling Context Context Awareness Context Aware Application Context Aware System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abowd, G.D., et al.: CybreMinder: A Context-Aware System for Supporting Reminders. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen, H.-W. (eds.) HUC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1927, p. 172. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benerecetti, M., et al.: Distributed Context-Aware Systems. Human-Computer Interaction 16(Special issue on Context-aware computing), 213–228 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroll, J.M. (ed.): Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalmers, D., et al.: QoS and Context Awareness for Mobile Computing. In: Gellersen, H.-W. (ed.) HUC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1707, p. 380. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, G., et al.: A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research, Dartmouth College, Department of Computer Science (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dey, A.K., et al.: Toward a Better Understanding of Context and Context- Awareness. Atlanta, GA, USA, Georgia Institute of Technology (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diaper, D., et al. (eds.): Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc., Mahwah (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engeström, Y., et al. (eds.): Perspectives on Activity Theory. Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hull, R., et al.: Towards Situated Computing. In: Proc. of The First Int. Symposium on Wearable Computers, Cambridge, Massachusetts, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, H., et al.: Task Knowledge Structures: psychological basis and integration into system design. Acta Psychologica 78, 3–26 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaptelinin, V., et al.: Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Application. In: CHI 1997, Los Angeles (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lieberman, H., et al.: Out of context: Computer Systems that Adapt to, and Learn from, Context. IBM Systems Journal 39(3&4), 617–632 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lucas, P.: Mobile Devices and Mobile Data-Issues of Identity and Reference. Human-Computer Interaction 16(2), 323–336 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, A., et al.: There is More to Context Than Location. Computers and Graphics 23(6), 893–901 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manasawee Kaenampornpan
    • 1
  • Eamonn O’Neill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations