Skip to main content

Resolving Schematic Discrepancy in the Integration of Entity-Relationship Schemas

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3288))

Abstract

In schema integration, chematic discrepancies occur when data in one database correspond to metadata in another. We define this kind of semantic heterogeneity in general using the paradigm of context that is the meta information relating to the source, classification, property etc of entities, relationships or attribute values in entity-relationship (ER) schemas. We present algorithms to resolve schematic discrepancies by transforming metadata into entities, keeping the information and constraints of original schemas. Although focusing on the resolution of schematic discrepancies, our technique works seamlessly with existing techniques resolving other semantic heterogeneities in schema integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of databases, pp. 216–235. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Somani, A., Xu, Y.: Storing and querying of e-commerce data. VLDB, 149–158 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M.: A methodology for data schema integration in the Entity- Relationship model. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 10(6) (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys 18(4), 323–364 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data. TODS 1(1) (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elmagarmid, A., Rusinkiewicz, M., Sheth, A.: Management of heterogeneous and autonomous database systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goh, C.H., Bressan, S., Madnick, S., Siegel, M.: Context interchange: new features and formalisms for the intelligent integration of information. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 17(3), 270–293 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gottlob, G.: Computing covers for embedded functional dependencies. SIGMOD (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu, C.N., Knoblock, C.A.: Semantic query optimization for query plans of heterogeneous multidatabase systems. TKDE 12(6), 959–978 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, Q., Ling, T.W.: Extending and inferring functional dependencies in schema transformation. Technical report, TRA3/04. School of Computing, National University of Singapore (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamurthy, R., Litwin, W., Kent, W.: Language features for interoperability of databases with schematic discrepancies. In: SIGMOD, pp. 40–49 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kashyap, V., Sheth, A.: Semantic and schematic similarity between database objects: a context- based approach. The VLDB Journal 5, 276–304 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ling, T.W., Lee, M.L.: Issues in an entity-relationship based federated database system. CODAS, pp. 60–69 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, M.L., Ling, T.W.: Resolving constraint conflicts in the integration of entityrelationship schemas. In: Embley, D.W. (ed.) ER 1997. LNCS, vol. 1331, pp. 394–407. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, M.L., Ling, T.W.: A methodology for structural conflicts resolution in the integration of entity-relationship schemas. Knowledge and Information Sys. 5, 225–247 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Sadri, F., Subramanian, S.N.: On efficiently implementing schemaSQL on SQL database system. In: VLDB, pp. 471–482 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Sadri, F., Subramanian, S.N.: SchemaSQL – an extension to SQL for multidatabase interoperability. TODS, pp. 476–519 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mattos, N.M.: Integrating information for on demand computing. In: VLDB, pp. 8–14 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, R.J.: Using schematically heterogeneous structures. In: SIGMOD, pp. 189–200 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Web ontology language, W3C recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/

  21. Reddy, M.P., Prasad, B.E., Gupta, A.: Formulating global integrity constraints during derivation of global schema. Data & Knowledge Engineering 16, 241–268 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheth, P., Gala, S.K.: Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing surveys 22(3) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sciore, E., Siegel, M., Rosenthal, A.: Using semantic values to facilitate interoperability among heterogeneous information systems. TODS 19(2), 254–290 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vermeer, M.W.W., Apers, P.M.G.: The role of integrity constraints in database interoperation. In: VLDB, pp. 425–435 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, X., Ling, T.W., Lee, M.L., Dobbie, G.: Designing Semistructured Databases Using ORA-SS Model. In: WISE, pp. 171–180 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

He, Q., Ling, T.W. (2004). Resolving Schematic Discrepancy in the Integration of Entity-Relationship Schemas. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, TW. (eds) Conceptual Modeling – ER 2004. ER 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3288. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23723-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30464-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics