Advertisement

Public Commons of Geographic Data: Research and Development Challenges

  • Harlan Onsrud
  • Gilberto Camara
  • James Campbell
  • Narnindi Sharad Chakravarthy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3234)

Abstract

Across the globe individuals and organizations are creating geographic data work products with little ability to efficiently or effectively make known and share those digital products with others. This article outlines a conceptual model and the accompanying research challenges for providing easy legal and technological mechanisms by which any creator might affirmatively and permanently mark and make accessible a geographic dataset such that the world knows where the dataset came from and that the data is available for use without the law assuming that the user must first acquire permission.

Keywords

Geographic Data Development Challenge Data Contributor Metadata Generation Public Sector Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Research Council, Committee for a Study on Promoting Access to Scientific and Technical Data for the Public Interest 1999, A Question of Balance: Private Rights and the Public Interest in Scientific and Technical Databases. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Commission of the European Communities, Public sector information: A key resource for Europe (COM(98)585 European Commission, Brussels) (1999), http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/docs/policy/docs/COM(98)585/Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pira International Ltd., University of East Anglia and KnowledgeView Ltd. 2000, Commercial exploitation of Europe’s public sector information: Final report for the European Commission Directorate General for the Information Society. Surbiton, Surrey, UK Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weiss, P.: Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Public Sector Information Policies and Their Economic Impact, U.S. National Weather Service (2002), http://www.weather.gov/sp/Borders_report.pdf
  5. 5.
    Moglen, E.: Freeing the Mind: Free Software and the Death of Proprietary Culture. In: Fourth Annual Technology and Law Conference. Portland, ME: UMaine Law School, oral recording (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maurer, S., Hugenholtz, P.B., Onsrud, H.: Europe’s Database Experiment. Science 294, 789–790 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benkler, Y.: Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm. Yale Law Journal 112(3), 369–446 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hill, L., Janee, G., Doulin, R., Frew, J., Larsgaard, M.: Collection Metadata Solutions for Digital Library Applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(13), 1169–1181 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), Metadata Content Standards (1999), http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/contstan.html
  10. 10.
    Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, DCMI (2003), http://www.dublincore.org/documents/dces
  11. 11.
    Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Geographical Categories: An Ontological Investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15, 591–612 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Association for Geographic Information, AGI (2003), http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk/agidict/welcome.html
  13. 13.
    Alexandria Digital Library Project, ADL (2003), http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu
  14. 14.
    Egenhofer, M.: Toward the Semantic Geospatial Web. In: ACM GIS 2002, McLean, VA, November 8- 9, pp. 1–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodriguez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.: Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 442–456 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bateman, J., Farrar, S.: Spatial Ontology Baseline [Preliminary], May 18 (2004), Available from http://www.sfbtr8.uni-bremen.de/project.html?project=I1 [cited 30 Jun 2004]
  17. 17.
    IBM Electronic Media Management System (EMMS), http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/emms/features/
  18. 18.
    Microsoft Windows Rights Management Services (RMS) for Windows Server (2003), http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/rightsmgmt/default.msx
  19. 19.
    Freeman, N., Boston, T., Chapman, A.: Integrating Internal, Intranet and Internet Access to Spatial Datasets via ERIN’s Environmental Data Directory. In: The 26th Annual Conference of AURISA, Perth, Australia, November 23-27 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharad, C.N.: Public Commons for Geospatial Data: A Conceptual Model, MS Thesis, Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering, University of Maine (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huber, W.: Vector Steganography: A Practical Introduction, Directions Magzine (2002), http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=195
  22. 22.
    Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, Searching and Sorting, vol. 3, pp. 513–558. Addison Wesley Publishing, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    NASA Clickworkers Project, available at http://clickworkers.arc.nasa.gov/top
  24. 24.
    Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, available at http://www.wikipedia.org
  25. 25.
    Rivlan, G.: Leader of the Free World. Wired, pp. 152-154 (November 2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raymond, E.: Homesteading the Noosphere. 8/00 (2000), http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/homesteading/ [cited 12/26/2003]
  27. 27.
    Raymond, E.: The Cathedral and the Bazaar. 9/00 (2000), http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathredral-bazaar/ [cited 12/31/2003]
  28. 28.
    Koha Open Source Library System, available at http://www.koha.org

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harlan Onsrud
    • 1
  • Gilberto Camara
    • 2
  • James Campbell
    • 1
  • Narnindi Sharad Chakravarthy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Spatial Information Science and EngineeringUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.Image Processing Division, National Institute for Space ResearchSão José dos CamposBrazil
  3. 3.GlaxoSmithClineUSA

Personalised recommendations