MHC Class I Epitope Binding Prediction Trained on Small Data Sets
The identification of potential T-cell epitopes is important for development of new human or vetenary vaccines, both considering single protein/subunit vaccines, and for epitope/peptide vaccines as such. The highly diverse MHC class I alleles bind very different peptides, and accurate binding prediction methods exist only for alleles were the binding pattern have been deduced from peptide motifs. Using empirical knowledge of important anchor positions within the binding peptides dramatically reduces the number of peptides needed for reliable predictions. We here present a general method for predicting peptides binding to specific MHC class I alleles. The method combines advanced automatic scoring matrix generation with empirical position specific differential anchor weighting. The method leads to predictions with a comparable or higher accuracy than other established prediction servers, even in situations where only very limited data are available for training.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brusic, V., Rudy, G., Harrison, L.C.: Prediction of MHC binding peptides using artificial neural networks. In: Complex systems: mechanism of adaptation (ed. a.Y.X. Stonier RJ), pp. 253–260. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1994)Google Scholar
- Buus, S., Lauemøller, S.L., Worning, P., Kesmir, C., Frimurer, T., Corbet, S., Fomsgaard, A., Hilden, J., Holm, A., Brunak, S.: Sensitive quantitative predictions of peptide- MHC binding by a ’Query by Committee’ artificial neural network approach. Tissue Antigens 62, 378–384 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christensen, J.K., Lamberth, K., Nielsen, M., Lundegaard, C., Worning, P., Lauemøller, S.L., Buus, S., Brunak, S., Lund, O.: Selecting Informative Data for Developing Peptide- MHC Binding Predictors Using a "Query By Committee" Approach. Neural Computation 15, 2931–2942 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kubo, R.T., Sette, A., Grey, H.M., Appella, E., Sakaguchi, K., Zhu, N.Z., Arnott, D., Sherman, N., Shabanowitz, J., Michel, H.: Definition of specific peptide motifs for four major HLA-A alleles. J. Immunol. 152, 3913–3924 (1994)Google Scholar
- Marshall, K.W., Wilson, K.J., Liang, J., Woods, A., Zaller, D., Rothbard, J.B.: Prediction of peptide affinity to HLA DRB1*0401. J. Immunol. 154, 5927–5933 (1995)Google Scholar
- Parker, K.C., Bednarek, M.A., Coligan, J.E.: Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J. Immunol. 152, 163–175 (1994)Google Scholar
- Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T.: Numerical Recipies in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
- Stryhn, A., Pedersen, L.O., Romme, T., Holm, C.B., Holm, A., Buus, S.: Peptide binding specificity of major histocompatibility complex class I resolved into an array of apparently independent subspecificities: quantitation by peptide libraries and improved prediction of binding. Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 1911–1918 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yu, K., Petrovsky, N., Schonbach, C., Koh, J.Y., Brusic, V.: Methods for prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules: a comparative study. Mol. Med. 8, 137–148 (2002)Google Scholar