Resolution of Modifier-Head Relation Gaps Using Automatically Extracted Metonymic Expressions
This paper proposes a method of extracting metonymic expressions and their interpretative expressions from corpora and its application for the full-parsing-based matching method of a QA system. An evaluation showed that 79% of the extracted interpretations were correct, and an experiment using testsets indicated that introducing the metonymic expressions significantly improved the performance.
KeywordsEvaluation Rate Computational Linguistics Novice User Relevant Text Text Collection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kiyota, Y., Kurohashi, S., Kido, F.: “Dialog Navigator”: A Question Answering System based on Large Text Knowledge Base. In: Proceedings of The 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2002), pp. 460–466 (2002)Google Scholar
- 2.Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)Google Scholar
- 3.Kurohashi, S., Nagao, M.: A syntactic analysis method of long Japanese sentences based on the detection of conjunctive structures. Computational Linguistics 20(4) (1994)Google Scholar
- 4.Kamei, S., Wakao, T.: Metonymy; reassessment, survey of acceptability, and its treatment in a machine translation system. In: Proceedings of 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 1992), pp. 309–311 (1992)Google Scholar
- 5.Fass, D.: met∗: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics 17(1), 49–90 (1991)Google Scholar
- 6.Murata, M., Ma, Q., Yamamoto, A., Isahara, H.: Metonymy interpretation using X NO Y examples. In: Proceedings of The 4th Symposium on Natural Language Processing (SNLP 2000) (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Utiyama, M., Murata, M., Isahara, H.: A statistical approach to the processing of metonymy. In: Proceedings of The 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), pp. 885–891 (2000)Google Scholar