Abstract
Classical logic predicts that everything (thus nothing useful at all) follows from inconsistency. A paraconsistent logic is a logic where an inconsistency does not lead to such an explosion, and since in practice consistency is difficult to achieve there are many potential applications of paraconsistent logics in knowledge-based systems, logical semantics of natural language, etc.
Higher order logics have the advantages of being expressive and with several automated theorem provers available. Also the type system can be helpful.
We present a concise description of a paraconsistent higher order logic with countably infinite indeterminacy, where each basic formula can get its own indeterminate truth value. The meaning of the logical operators is new and rather different from traditional many-valued logics as well as from logics based on bilattices. Thus we try to build a bridge between the communities of higher order logic and many-valued logic.
A case study is studied and a sequent calculus is proposed based on recent work by Muskens.
This research was partly sponsored by the IT University of Copenhagen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, A.R., Belnap Jr., N.D.: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1975)
Andrews, P.B.: A reduction of the axioms for the theory of propositional types. Fundamenta Mathematicae 52, 345–350 (1963)
Andrews, P.B.: A Transfinite Type Theory with Type Variables. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1965)
Andrews, P.B.: An Introduction to Mathematical Logic and Type Theory: To Truth through Proof. Academic Press, London (1986)
Andrews, P.B., Bishop, M., Issar, S., Nesmith, D., Pfenning, F., Xi, H.: TPS: A theorem proving system for classical type theory. Journal of Automated Reasoning 16, 321–353 (1996)
Arieli, O., Avron, A.: Bilattices and paraconsistency. In: Batens, D., Mortensen, C., Priest, G., Van-Bengedem, J. (eds.) Frontiers in Paraconsistent Logic, pp. 11–27. Research Studies Press (2000)
Barendregt, H.P.: The Lambda Calculus, Its Syntax and Semantics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1984) (revised edition)
Belnap Jr., N.D.: A useful four-valued logic. In: Dunn, J.M., Epstein, G. (eds.) Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 8–37. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)
Benzmüller, C., Kohlhase, M.: LEO: A higher-order theorem prover. In: Kirchner, C., Kirchner, H. (eds.) CADE 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1421, pp. 139–143. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Church, A.: A formulation of the simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 56–68 (1940)
Evans, G.: Can there be vague objects? Analysis 38(4), 208 (1978)
Ginsberg, M.: Multivalued logics: A uniform approach to inference in artificial intelligence. Computer Intelligence 4, 265–316 (1988)
Gottwald, S.: A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics. Research Studies Press (2001)
Henkin, L.: A theory of propositional types. Fundamenta Mathematicae 52, 323–344 (1963)
Kohlhase, M.: Ortwin Scheja. Higher-order multi-valued resolution. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 9(4) (1999)
Mendelson, E.: Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 4th edn. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (1997)
Muskens, R.: Meaning and Partiality. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1995)
Paulson, L.C.: Isabelle – A Generic Theorem Prover. In: Paulson, L.C. (ed.) Isabelle. LNCS, vol. 828, Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
Villadsen, J.: Combinators for paraconsistent attitudes. In: de Groote, P., Morrill, G., Retoré, C. (eds.) LACL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2099, pp. 261–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Villadsen, J.: Paraconsistent query answering systems. In: Andreasen, T., Motro, A., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2522, pp. 370–384. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Villadsen, J.: Supra-logic: Using transfinite type theory with type variables for paraconsistency. In: III World Congress on Paraconsistency, Toulouse, France (2003)
Villadsen, J.: Paraconsistent assertions. In: Second German Conference on Multiagent System Technologies, Springer, Heidelberg (2004); To appear in LNCS
Wiedijk, F.: Comparing mathematical provers. In: Asperti, A., Buchberger, B., Davenport, J.H. (eds.) MKM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2594, pp. 188–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Villadsen, J. (2004). A Paraconsistent Higher Order Logic. In: Buchberger, B., Campbell, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Symbolic Computation. AISC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3249. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30210-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30210-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23212-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30210-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive