Advertisement

End-to-End Quality of Service Monitoring Using ICMP and SNMP

  • Yong-Hoon Choi
  • Beomjoon Kim
  • Jaesung Park
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3262)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new management information base (MIB) called Service Monitoring (SM) MIB. The MIB enables a network manager to gather end-to-end management information by utilizing special test packet. The special packet is an Internet control message protocol (ICMP) application that can be sent to a remote network element to monitor its Internet services. The SM MIB makes end-to-end management possible without using any special measurement architectures or equipments. Real examples show that the proposed SM MIB is useful for end-to-end quality of service (QoS) monitoring. The accuracy of obtained data, priority and security issues are discussed.

Keywords

Packet Loss Round Trip Time User Datagram Protocol Packet Loss Ratio Simple Network Management Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldszmidt, G.: Distributed Management by Delegation. Ph. D. Dissertation, Columbia University (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherkaoui, O., et al.: QOS Metrics tool using management by delegation. In: IEEE Network Operation and Management Symposium (NOMS’98) New Orleans LA, USA, 836-839 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohoris, C., et al.: Using Mobile Agents for Network Performance Management. In: IEEE Network Operation and Management Symposium (NOMS 2000), Honolulu Hawaii, USA, pp. 637–652 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Waldbusser, S.: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base. RFC 2819 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waldbusser, S.: Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base Version 2 using SMIv2. RFC 2021 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Paxson, V., et al.: An Architecture for Large-Scale Internet Measurement. IEEE Comm. Mgz. 36(8), 48–54 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stephan, E., Jewitt, J.: IPPM reporting MIB. Internet Draft: draft-ietf-ippmreporting- mib-05.txt (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matthews, W., Cottrell, L.: The PingER Project: Active Internet Performance Monitoring for the HENP Community. IEEE Comm. Mgz., 130–136 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong-Hoon Choi
    • 1
  • Beomjoon Kim
    • 2
  • Jaesung Park
    • 3
  1. 1.RAN S/W Group, System S/W Dept., System Research LabLG Electronics Inc., LG R&D ComplexAnyang-City, Kyongki-doKorea
  2. 2.Standardiztion & System Research Group (SSRG), Mobile Communication Technology Research LabLG Electronics Inc 
  3. 3.Architecture Group, System LabLG Electronics Inc 

Personalised recommendations