Skip to main content

Abstract

One present goal of researchers and developers is to design software tools that make learning materials available online in an educationally effective manner. We face the twofold challenge of implementing advanced e-learning functionalities, though designing their interface so as to provide an easy interaction grasping the students’ interest. A poorly designed interface makes students spend more time in learning it than in mastering the provided knowledge, so becoming a barrier to effective learning. In this context, both User-Centered Design (UCD) and Learner-Centered Design (LCD) guidelines are needed; it is also important to devise suited evaluation tools, able to help in identifying usability, and, more in general, accessibility flaws. Such tools must be designed bearing in mind the specific characteristics of e-learning applications. Traditional heuristic evaluation appears too general and subjective. In this paper, we propose a set of guidelines and criteria for e-learning platforms (containers) and for educational modules (contents), to be used within the SUE (Systematic Usability Evaluation) inspection. We point out that human factors experts can primarily evaluate “syntactic” aspects of applications. Experts of education science and domain experts are to be involved for a more comprehensive evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C.: Empirical Development of a Heuristics Evaluation Methodology for Shared Workspace Groupware. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2002), New Orleans, Lousiana, USA, November 16-20, pp. 96–105 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costabile, M.F., De Angeli, A., Roselli, T., Lanzilotti, R., Plantamura, P.: Evaluating the Educational Impact of a Tutoring Hypermedia for Children. Information Technology in Childhood Educational Annual, pp. 289–308 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Costabile, M.F., De Angeli, A., Roselli, T., Lanzilotti, R., Plantamura, P.: Does Hypermedia Really Work for Tutoring Children? IEEE Multimedia, pp. 65–69 ( April-June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. CPB/WGBH National Center for Accessible Media (NCAM), http://ncam.wgbh.org/cdrom/guideline/

  5. Doubleday, A., Ryan, M., Springett, M., Sutcliffe, A.: A Comparison of Usability Techniques for Evaluating Design. In: Proceedings of DIS 1997, Amsterdam, NL, August 1997, pp. 101–110. ACM Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IMS Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning Applications, Versione 1.0, White Paper (2002), http://www.imsproject.org/accessibility/

  7. ISO 9241: Ergonomics Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminal (VDT) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffriess, R., Miller, J., Wharton, C., Uyeda, K.M.: User Interface Evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. In: Proceedings of CHI 1991, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 119–124. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kantner, L., Rosenbaum, S.: Usability Studies of WWW sites: Heuristic Evaluation vs Laboratory Testing. In: Proceedings of SIGDOC 1997, Snowbird, UT, USA, pp. 153–160. ACM Press, New York (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kruse, K.: Web rules: effective user interface design (May 2000), http://www.learningcircuits.org/may2000/may2000_webrules.html

  11. The Learning Federation, http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/repo

  12. Mankoff, J., Dey, A., Hsieh, G., Kients, J., Lederer, S., Ames, M.: Heuristic Evaluation of Ambient Display. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2003), Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, April 5-10, pp. 169–176 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matera, M., Costabile, M.F., Garzotto, F., Paolini, P.: SUE Inspection: an Effective Method for Systematic Usability Evaluation of Hypermedia. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybvernetics-Part A 32(1), 93–103 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L.: Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Norman, D.: Things That Make us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quintana, C., Carra, A., Krajcik, J., Elliot, S.: Learner-Centred Design: Reflections and new Directions. In: Carroll (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, pp. 605–626. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roselli, T.: Artificial Intelligence Can Improve Hypermedia Instructional Technologies for Learning. ACM Computing Surveys 27(4), 624–626 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roselli, T., Faggiano, E., Rossano, V.: A Further Investigation On The Effectiveness Of A WWW Hypermedial System For Cooperative Learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer in Education (ICCE 2003), Hong Kong, Cina, December 2003, pp. 440–442 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roselli, T., Faggiano, E., Grasso, A., Rossano, V.: A Platform for Building and Using Personalized Courseware. In: Proceedings of E-Learn 2003: World conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Phoenix, Arizona USA, November 2003, pp. 141–144 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roselli, T., Faggiano, E., Grasso, A., Pragnell, M.V.: A formal model for developing elearning software. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Convention (Mipro 2003), Opatija, Croatia, May 2003, pp. 70–74 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soloway, E., Jackson, S.L., Kleim, J., Quintana, C., Reed, J., Spitulnik, J., Stratford, S.J., Studer, S., Eng, J., Scala, N.: Learning Theory in Practice: Case Studies in Learner-Centered Design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1996), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, April 1996, pp. 189–196. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Somervell, J., Wahid, S., McCrickard, D.S.: Usability Heuristics for Large Screen Information Exhibits. In: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (Interact 2003), Zurigo, Svizzera, Septmber 2003, pp. 904–907 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D., Sfyrakis, M., Paramythis, A.: Universal accessibility in HCI: Process-oriented design guidelines and tool requirements. In: Long Paper of the 4th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, Stockholm, Sweden, October 19-21 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ardito, C. et al. (2004). Towards Guidelines for Usability of e-Learning Applications. In: Stary, C., Stephanidis, C. (eds) User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society. UI4ALL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23375-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30111-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics