Skip to main content

Priority Systems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3188))

Abstract

We present a framework for the incremental construction of deadlock-free systems meeting given safety properties. The framework borrows concepts and basic results from the controller synthesis paradigm by considering a step in the construction process as a controller synthesis problem.

We show that priorities are expressive enough to represent restrictions induced by deadlock-free controllers preserving safety properties. We define a correspondence between such restrictions and priorities and provide compositionality results about the preservation of this correspondence by operations on safety properties and priorities. Finally, we provide an example illustrating an application of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altisen, K., Gössler, G., Pnueli, A., Sifakis, J., Tripakis, S., Yovine, S.: A framework for scheduler synthesis. In: Proc. RTSS 1999, pp. 154–163. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altisen, K., Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: Scheduler modeling based on the controller synthesis paradigm. Journal of Real-Time Systems, special issue on ”controltheoretical approaches to real-time computing” 23(1/2), 55–84 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, L., Ligatti, J., Walker, D.: A calculus for composing security policies. Technical Report TR-655-02, Princeton University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bornot, S., Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: On the construction of live timed systems. In: Schwartzbach, M.I., Graf, S. (eds.) TACAS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1785, pp. 109–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: Component-based construction of deadlock-free systems. In: Pandya, P.K., Radhakrishnan, J. (eds.) FSTTCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2914, pp. 420–433. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gössler, G., Sifakis, J.: Composition for component-based modeling. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2852, pp. 443–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Graf, S., Ober, I., Ober, I.: Model checking of uml models via a mapping to communicating extended timed automata. In: Graf, S., Mounier, L. (eds.) SPIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2989. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Mendhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C.V., Loingtier, J.-M., Irwin, J.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: Aksit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kloukinas, C., Nakhli, C., Yovine, S.: A methodology and tool support for generating scheduled native code for real-time java applications. In: Alur, R., Lee, I. (eds.) EMSOFT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2855, pp. 274–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ligatti, J., Bauer, L., Walker, D.: Edit automata: Enforcement mechanisms for run-time security policies. Technical Report TR-681-03, Princeton University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maler, O., Pnueli, A., Sifakis, J.: On the synthesis of discrete controllers for timed systems. In: Mayr, E.W., Puech, C. (eds.) STACS 1995. LNCS, vol. 900, pp. 229–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramadge, P.J., Wonham, W.M.: Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes. SIAM J. Control and Optimization 25(1) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rutten, E., Marchand, H.: Task-level programming for control systems using discrete control synthesis. Technical Report 4389, INRIA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider, F.: Enforceable security policies. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 3(1), 30–50 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tarr, P., D’Hondt, M., Bergmans, L., Lopes, C.V.: Workshop on aspects and dimensions of concern: Requirements on, challenge problems for, advanced separation of concerns. In: ECOOP 2000 Workshop Proceedings, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gössler, G., Sifakis, J. (2004). Priority Systems. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, WP. (eds) Formal Methods for Components and Objects. FMCO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30101-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30101-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22942-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30101-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics