Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidenz in der Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie

  • Chapter
Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

  • 2417 Accesses

Auszug

Die Zahl der Lehrbücher, die das Wort evidenzbasiert im Titel führen, ist inzwischen unüberschaubar. Dabei sind die Vorstellungen, was sich hinter diesem Schlagwort verbirgt, offensichtlich recht unterschiedlich. Evidenzbasierte Kenntnisse sind für das fachliche Handeln obligat. Nicht immer sind die Grundlagen leicht nachvollziehbar. Deshalb enthält dieses Kapitel Hinweise, wo entsprechende Ressourcen zu finden sind. Auβerdem wird eine kleine Anleitung mit Grundkenntnissen der evidenzbasierten Medizin (EbM) angefügt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356(9239): 1375–1383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotaska A (2004) Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. BMJ 329(7473): 1039–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kadar N (1993) The operative laparoscopy debate: technology assessment or statistical Jezebel? Biomed Pharmacother 47(5): 201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023): 71–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidencebased medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268: 2420–2425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Strauss SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB (2005) Evidence-based medicine, 3rd edn. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse M (1989) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. King JF (2005) A short history of evidence-based obstetric care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19(1): 3–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosteller F (1993) The prospect of data-based medicine in the light of ECPC. Milbank Q 71(3): 523–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cochrane AL (1972) Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services. The Nuffield Trust, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chalmers I, Hetherington J, Newdick M et al. (1986) The Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials: developing a register of published reports of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials 7(4): 306–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Enkin M, Keirse M, Renfrew M, Neilson J (1998) Effektive Betreuung während Schwangerschaft und Geburt. 1. dt. Ausg. der 2. engl. Ausg. Ullstein Medical, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  13. Enkin M, Keirse MJ, Chalmers I (1998) A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keirse MJ (1994) Zusammenfassung von Ergebnissen aus kontrollierten klinischen Studien. 5. Workshop zur Hebammenforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Elwin Staude, Hannover, S 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanke M, Mallmann P (2002) Evidence-based medicine and everyday practice of clinical obstetrics-a contradiction? Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 96(10): 637–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Enkin MW, Keirse MJ, Neilson JP et al. (2006) Effektive Betreuung während Schwangerschaft und Geburt. 2. dt. Ausg. der 3. engl. Ausg. Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferriman A (2002) Patients get access to evidence based, online health information. BMJ 325(7365): 618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Godlee F (2000) Clinical evidence. Die besten Studien für die beste klinische Praxis. Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crowley P, Chalmers I, Keirse MJ (1990) The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obs-tet Gynaecol 97(1): 11–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJ (1989) Promoting pulmonary maturity. In: Chalmers et al. Effective care in preg-nancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 746–764

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liggins GC, Howie RN (1972) A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 50(4): 515–525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liggins GC (1969) Premature delivery of foetal lambs infused with glucocorticoids. J Endocrinol 45(4): 515–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dalziel SR, Walker NK, Parag V et al. (2005) Cardiovascular risk factors after antenatal exposure to betamethasone: 30-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9474): 1856–1862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Papatsonis D, Flenady V, Cole S, Liley H (2005) Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD004452

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anotayanonth S, Subhedar NV, Garner P, Neilson J P, Harigopal S (2004) Betamimetics for inhibiting preterm la-bour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD004352

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jonas S (2002) Childbirth: a comprehensive perspective. Approaches in health technology assessment. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 96(10): 689–693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about the-rapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 270(21): 2598–2601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials 17(1): 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jordens CF, Hawe P, Irwig LM et al. (1998) Use of systematic reviews of randomised trials by Australian neonato-logists and obstetricians. Med J Aust 168(6): 267–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanke M, Mallmann P (2002) Evidence-based medicine and everyday practice of clinical obstetrics-a contradiction? Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 96(10): 637–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wyatt JC, Paterson-Brown S, Johanson R, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ, Fisk NM (1998) Randomised trial of educa-tional visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units. BMJ 317(7165): 1041–1046

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sisk JE, Greer AL, Wojtowycz M, Pincus LB, Aubry RH (2004) Implementing evidence-based practice: evaluation of an opinion leader strategy to improve breast-feeding rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(2): 413–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hofmeyr J, Hannah ME (2006) Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(1): 20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Keirse MJ (2002) Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies? Birth 29(1): 55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lomas J, Sisk JE, Stocking B (1993) From evidence to practice in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Milbank Q 71(3): 405–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME (2003) Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD000166

    Google Scholar 

  37. Green JE, McLean F, Smith LP, Usher R (1982) Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced in incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death? Am J Obstet Gynecol 142 (6 Pt 1): 643–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng M, Hannah M (1993) Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 82: 605–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Luterkort M, Polberger S, Persson PH, Bjerre I (1986) Role of asphyxia and slow intrauterine growth in morbidity among breech delivered infants. Early Hum Dev 14(1): 19–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Leung WC, Pun TC, Wong WM (1999) Undiagnosed breech revisited. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(7): 638–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wright RC (1959) Reduction of perinatal mortality and morbidity in breech delivery through routine use of cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 14: 758–763

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Barrett JF (2003) Randomised controlled trial for twin delivery. BMJ 326(7386): 448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics for medical research. 9th ed. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schwarz C, Wenzlaff P, Hecker H, Groß MM (2005) Prozessorientierte Qualitätssicherung während der Betreuung von Gebärenden. In: Zentrum für Qualität und Management im Gesundheitswesen, Ärztekammer Niedersach-sen (Hrsg) NPExtra 2004, Version 1.1. Verlag Wissenschaft-liche Scripten, Zwickau, S 171–174

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gross MM (2001) Gebären als Prozess. Empirische Befunde für eine wissenschaftliche Neuorientierung. Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  46. Girard M (1999) Episiotomy: a form of genital mutilation. Lancet 354(9178): 595–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tuffnell DJ, West J, Walkinshaw SA (2003) Treatments for gestational diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD003395

    Google Scholar 

  48. Arbeitsausschuss Familienplanung des Bundesausschusses der Ärtze und Krankenkassen (2003) Screening auf Gestationsdiabetes gemäß § 135 Abs. 1 SGB V. 5-11-2003

    Google Scholar 

  49. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS (2005) Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 352(24): 2477–2486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study (2002) Int J Gynaecol Obstet 78(1): 69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vodermaier A, Caspari C, Kohm J, Bauerfeind I, Kahlert S, Untch M (2004) Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung beim primären Mammakarzinom. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 98(2): 127–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sakala C, Gyte G, Henderson S, Neilson J P, Horey D (2001) Consumer-professional partnership to improve research: the experience of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Pregnan-cy and Childbirth Group. Birth 28(2): 133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Cochrane-Zentrum Freiburg, Abt. Med. Biometrie und Statistik, Klinikum der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, 79104, Freiburg

    PD Dr. med. Antje Timmer

  2. Zentrum Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover

    Dr. med. Mechthild M. Gross

Authors
  1. PD Dr. med. Antje Timmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. med. Mechthild M. Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Timmer, A., Gross, M.M. (2007). Evidenz in der Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. In: Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30098-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30098-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30097-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30098-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation