Advertisement

Assessing Spline-Based Multi-resolution 2D-3D Image Registration for Practical Use in Surgical Guidance

  • Guoyan Zheng
  • Xuan Zhang
  • Lutz-Peter Nolte
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3150)

Abstract

A spline-based multi-resolution 2D-3D image registration algorithm has recently been introduced [1-3]. However, its accuracy, robustness, and efficiency have not been fully investigated. In this paper, we focus on assessing and improving this newly introduced 2D-3D registration algorithm. A phantom and a cadaver test, together with their respective ground truths, were specially designed for this purpose. A novel least-squares normalized pattern intensity (LSNPI) similarity measure was proposed to improve the accuracy and robustness. Several parameters that may also affect its robustness, accuracy, and efficiency are experimentally determined, including the final resolution level, the initial guess of the patient pose, the number of 2D projection images, and the angle between 2D projection images. Our experiments show that it is feasible for the assessed 2D-3D registration algorithm to achieve sub-millimeter accuracy in a realistic setup in less than two minutes, when it is used together with the newly proposed similarity measure.

Keywords

Ground Truth Projection Image Fiducial Marker Registration Algorithm Target Registration Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jonić, S., Thévenaz, P., Unser, M.: Multiresolution spline-based 3D/2D registration of CT volume and C-arm images for computer-assisted surgery. In: Sonka, M., Hanson, K.M. (eds.) Proc. SPIE. Medical Imaging 2001: Image Processing, vol. 4322, pp. 1101–1109 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jonić, S., Thévenaz, P., Unser, M.: Multiresolution-based registration of a volume to a set of its projections. In: Sonka, M., Fitzpatrick, J.M. (eds.) Proc. SPIE. Medical Imaging 2003: Image Processing, vol. 5032, pp. 1049–1052 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonić, S., Thévenaz, P., Zheng, G., Nolte, L.-P., Unser, M.: Spline-based registration of a 3D CT to a set of C-arm images. IEEE T Med Imaging (submitted)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamadeh, A., Lavallée, S., Cinquin, P.: Automated 3-Dimensional Computer Tomographic and Fluoroscopic Image Registration. Comp Aid Surg 3, 11–19 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomaževič, D., Likar, B., Slivnik, T., Pernuš, F.: 3-D/2-D Registration of CT and MR to X-Ray Images. IEEE T Med Imaging 22(11), 1407–1416 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weese, J., Buzug, T.M., Lorenz, C., Fassnacht, C.: An approach to 2D/3D registration of a vertebra in 2D x-ray fluoroscopies with 3D CT images. In: Troccaz, J., Grimson, E., Mijsges, R. (eds.) Proc. CVRMED-MRCAS 1997, pp. 119–128 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Penney, G.P., Weese, J., Little, J.A., Desmedt, P., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration. IEEE T Med Imaging 17(4), 586–595 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    LaRose, D., Hayouth, J., Kanade, T.: Transgraph: Interactive intensity-based 2D/3D registra-tion of X-ray and CT data. In: Kanson, K.M. (ed.) Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2000: Im-age Processing, vol. 3979, pp. 385–396 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rohlfing, T., Russakoff, D.B., Murphy, M.J., Maurer, C.R.: An intensity-based registration algorithm for probabilistic images and its application for 2-D to 3-D image registration. In: Sonka, M., Fitzpatrick, J.M. (eds.) Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2002: Image Processing, vol. 4684, pp. 581–591 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Livyatan, H., Yaniv, Z., Joskowicz, L.: Gradient-based 2-D/3-D rigid registration of fluoro-scopic X-ray to CT. IEEE T Med Imaging 22(11), 1395–1406 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofstetter, R., Slomczykowski, M., Sati, M., Nolte, L.-P.: Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comp Aid Surg 4, 65–76 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yao, J., Taylor, R.: Assessing accuracy factors in deformable 2D/3D medical image regis-tration using a statistical pelvis model. In: Proc. of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2003), pp. 1329–1334 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guoyan Zheng
    • 1
  • Xuan Zhang
    • 1
  • Lutz-Peter Nolte
    • 1
  1. 1.M.E. Müller Institute for Surgical Technology and BiomechanicsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations