Production of Transgenic Pigs by DNA Microinjection

  • Robert M. Petters
  • Rebecca L. Krisher
Part of the Principles and Practice book series (PRINCIPLES)


Maturation Medium Embryo Donor Fertilization Medium Sperm Pellet Culture Drop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abeydeera LR (2001) In vitro fertilization and embryo development in pigs. Reproduction 58[Suppl]:159–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boquest AC, Grupen CG, Harrison SJ, McIlfatrick SM, Ashman RJ, d’ Apice AJ, Nottle MB (2002) Production of cloned pigs from cultured fetal fibroblast cells. Biol Reprod 66:1283–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brad AM, Bormann CL, Swain JE, Durkin RE, Johnson AE, Clifford AL, Krisher RL (2003) Glutathione and adenosine triphosphate content of in vivo and in vitro matured porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 64:492–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gandhi AP, Lane M, Gardner DK, Krisher RL (2000) A single medium supports development of bovine embryos throughout maturation, fertilization and culture. Human Reprod 15:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gandhi AP, Lane M, Gardner DK, Krisher RL (2001) Substrate utilization in porcine embryos cultured in NCSU23 and G1.2/G2.2 sequential culture media. Mol Reprod Dev 58:269–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gardner DK, Lane M, Spitzer A, Batt PA (1994) Enhanced rates of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells, amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development. Biol Reprod 50:390–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardner DK, Lane MW, Lane M (1997) Bovine blastocyst cell number is increased by culture with EDTA for the first 72 hours of development from the zygote. Theriogenology 47:278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu Z, Foote RH (1995) Development of bovine embryos in KSOM with added superoxide dismutase and taurine and with five and twenty percent O2. Biol Reprod 53:786–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marchal R, Pelaez J, Terqui M, Mermillod P (2002) Effect of sperm survival and ctc staining pattern on in vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 57:1917–1927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Petters RM, Wells KD (1993) Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 48[Suppl]:61–73Google Scholar
  11. Phelps CJ, Koike C, Vaught TD, Boone J, Wells KD, Chen SH, Ball S, Specht SM, Pelejaeva IA, Monahan JA, Jobst PM, Sharm SB, Lamborn AE, Garst AS, Moore M, Demetris AJ, Rudert WA, Bottino R, Bertera S, Trucco M, Starzl TE, Dai Y, Ayares DL (2003) Production of alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs. Science 299:411–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Polites HG, Pinkert CA (1994) 2DNA microinjection and transgenic animal production. In: C. Pinkert (ed) Transgenic animal technology — a laboratory handbook. Academic Press, New York, pp 15–68Google Scholar
  13. Sommer JR, Collins EB, Neiding T, Rozeboom K, Wong F, Petters RM (2002) Conservation and regeneration of transgenic lines of swine by semen cryopreservation and artificial insemination. Lab Animal 31:25–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Swain JE, Bormann CL, Clark SG, Walters EM, Wheeler MB, Krisher RL (2002) Use of energy substrates by various stage preimplantation pig embryos produced in vivo and in vitro. Reproduction 123:253–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swain JE, Bormann CL, Krisher RL (2001) Development and viability of in vitro derived porcine embryos cultured in NCSU23 and G1.2/G2.2 sequential medium. Theriogenology 56:459–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Swindle MM (1983) Basic surgical exercises using swine. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Swindle MM (1998) Surgery, anesthesia and experimental techniques in swine. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  18. Tervit HR, Whittingham DG, Rowson LEA (1972) Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J Reprod Fertil 30:493–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wall RJ, Pursel VG, Hammer RE, Brinster RL (1985) Development of porcine ova that were centrifuged to permit visualization of pronuclei and nuclei. Biol Reprod 32:645–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu G-M, Sun Q-Y, Mao J, Lai L, McCauley TC, Park K-W, Prather RS, Didion BA, Day BN (2002) High developmental competence of pig oocytes after meiotic inhibition with a specific m-phase promoting factor kinase inhibitor, butyrolactone i. Biol Reprod 67:170–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Petters
    • 1
  • Rebecca L. Krisher
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Animal Sciences, Lilly Hall of Life Sciences, Lab VPTH 201/204Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations