Abstract

The direct computation of natural image block statistics is unfeasible due to the huge domain space. In this paper we shall propose a procedure to collect block statistics on compressed versions of natural 4 × 4 patches. If the reconstructed blocks are close enough to the original ones, these statistics can clearly be quite representative of the true natural patch statistics. We shall work with a fractal image compression–inspired codebook scheme, in which we will compute for each block B its contrast σ, brightness μ and a normalized codebook approximation D B of (B - μ)/σ. Entropy and mutual information estimates suggest a first order approximation p(B)≃ p(D B )p(μ)p(σ) of the probabibility p(B) of a given natural block, while a more precise approximation can be written as p(B)≃ p(D B )p(μ)p(σ)Φ(||∇B||). We shall also study the structure of p(σ) and p(D), the more relevant probability components. The first one presents an exponential behavior for non flat patches, while p(D) behaves uniformly with respecto to volume in patch space.

Keywords

Mutual Information Natural Image Image Patch Lena Image Joint Entropy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher, Y. (ed.): Fractal Image Compression: Theory and Application. Springer, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Hateren, J.H., van der Schaaf, A.: Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 359–366 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koroutchev, K., Dorronsoro, J.: Hash–like Fractal Image Compression with Linear Execution Time. In: Perales, F.J., Campilho, A.C., Pérez, N., Sanfeliu, A. (eds.) IbPRIA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2652, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, A.B., Pedersen, K.S., Mumford, D.: The Complex Statistics of High-Contrast Patches in Natural Images. In: WWW Proceedings of Second International IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, Vancouver, Canada (July 2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marr, D.: Vision. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paninski, L.: Estimation of Entropy and Mutual Information. Neural Computation 15, 1191–1253 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruderman, D.L.: The statistics of natural images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 5, 517–548 (1994)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srivastava, A., Lee, A.B., Simoncelli, E.P., Zhu, S.C.: On Advances in Statistical Modeling of Natural Images. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 18(1), 17–33 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Turiel, A., Parga, N., Ruderman, D., Cronin, T.: Multiscaling and information content of natural color images. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1138–1148 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weinberger, M., Seroussi, G., Sapiro, G.: LOCO-I: A Low Complexity, Context- Based, Lossless Image Compression Algorithm. In: Proc. of the IEEE Data Compression Conference, Snowbird, Utah (March-April 1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kostadin Koroutchev
    • 1
  • José R. Dorronsoro
    • 1
  1. 1.Depto. de Ingeniería Informática and Instituto de Ingeniería del ConocimientoUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations