Advertisement

The Misrepresentation of Use in Technology Demonstrations

  • Wally Smith
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3101)

Abstract

Demonstrations are ubiquitous in the world of information systems development, but it is not clear what role they play. It is contended that demonstrations are an informal attempt to examine issues of usefulness and usability, insofar as they bring together the technology, the user, genuine tasks and the organizational context. This raises the question, How well are new technologies and their use represented in demonstrations? An interview study with experienced demonstrators and audiences is reported and investigated in terms of Goffman’s frame analysis. Demonstrations are interpreted as a kind of theatrical performance in which the situation of use is acted out. Various types of potential misrepresentation are identified in the study, including simulated and exaggerated functionality, serendipitous interaction paths and the manipulation of demonstrator credibility. It is argued that these distortions may mask the importance of human-computer interaction.

Keywords

Organizational Context Interview Study Impression Management Frame Analysis Technology Demonstration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerman, M.S.: The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction 15 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston Mass (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chatman, S.: Story and Discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell University Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dennis, A., Wixon, B.: Systems Analysis & Design. Wiley, Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gross, B.M.: Demonstrations of Information Systems Research (Unpublished research paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laurel, B.: Computers As Theatre. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leary, M.R.: Self-Presentation: impression management and interpersonal behaviour. Westview Press, Boulder (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, D.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Whitten, J., Bentley, L., Dittman, K.: Systems Analysis & Design Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wally Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsThe University of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations