Advertisement

Towards a General Model for Assisting Navigation

  • Mike McGavin
  • James Noble
  • Robert Biddle
  • Judy Brown
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3101)

Abstract

In this paper, we review the principles of navigation, present a general model for supporting navigation in user interface design, and show examples of how the model can be applied. The model has four different properties along which navigational scenarios can be classified. These are: dimensionality, freedom of movement, presentation and reinforcement. We show how use of the model leads to heuristics to help in the design and evaluation of user interfaces that include navigational aspects.

Keywords

Negative Reinforcement Active Presentation Dead Reckoning Route Knowledge Assist Navigation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barr, P., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: A Semiotic Model of User-Interface Metaphor. In: Virtual, Distributed and Flexible Organisations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benyon, D.R.: Beyond navigation as metaphor. In: Proceedings of 2nd EuroDL conference, Crete (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Butler, D.L., Acquino, A.L., Hijsong, A.A., Scott, P.A.: Wayfinding by newcomers in a complex building. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors Society 35(1), 159–173 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chapius, N., Varlet, C.: Short cuts by dogs in natural surroundings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39B, 49–64 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, C., Czerwinski, M.: Spatial ability and visual navigation: An empirical study. The New Review for Hypertext and Multimedia 3, 40–66 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Downs, R.M.: Maps and mapping as metaphors for spatial representation. In: Liben, L.S., Patterson, A.H., Newcombe, N. (eds.) Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: theory and application, ch. 6. pp. 143–166. Academic Press, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hart, R.A., Moore, G.T.: The development of spatial cognition: A review. In: Downs, R.M., Stea, D. (eds.) Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior, Aldine, Chicago, ch. 14. pp. 246–295 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunt, E., Waller, D.: Orientation and wayfinding: A review. Technical report, University of Washington (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johns, C.: Spatial learning: Cognitive mapping in abstract virtual environments. In: Proceedings of Afrigraph 2003, Cape Town, South Africa, February 2003, pp. 7–16. AFRIGRAPH (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jul, S., Furnas, G.W.: Navigation in electronic worlds: A CHI 1997 Workshop. In: Pemberton, S. (ed.) ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, October 1997, vol. 29, pp. 44–49. ACM Press, New York (1997), Also available online at http://www.si.umich.edu/furnas/Papers/Nav97_Report.pdf Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitchin, R.M.: Cognitive maps: What they are and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology 14(1), 1–19 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis, D.: Observations on route finding and spatial orientation among the aboriginal peoples of the western desert region of central australia. Oceania 46(4), 249–282 (1976)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis, D.: We, the Navigators: The Ancient Art of Landfinding in the Pacific, 2nd edn. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Cicinelli, J.G., Pellegrino, J.W., Fry, P.A.: Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122(1), 73–91 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mittelstaedt, H., Mittelstaedt, M.L.: Homing by path integration. In: Papi, F., Wallraff, H.G. (eds.) Avian Navigation: International Symposium on Avian Navigation (ISAN) held at Tirrenia (Pisa), September 11-14, pp. 290–297. Springer, Berlin (1982)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moeser, S.D.: Cognitive mapping in a complex building. Environment and Behavior 20(1), 21–49 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Passini, R.: Wayfinding in Architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931-1958)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 10, 9–55 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tolman, E.: Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55(4), 198–208 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    von Saint Paul, U.: Do geese use path integration for walking home? In: Papi, F., Wallraff, H.G. (eds.) Avian Navigation: International Symposium on Avian Navigation (ISAN) held at Tirrenia (Pisa), September 11-14, 1981, pp. 298–307. Springer, Berlin (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike McGavin
    • 1
  • James Noble
    • 1
  • Robert Biddle
    • 1
  • Judy Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mathematical and Computing SciencesVictoria University of WellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations