Advertisement

Enhanced Email Classification Based on Feature Space Enriching

  • Yunming Ye
  • Fanyuan Ma
  • Hongqiang Rong
  • Joshua Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3136)

Abstract

Email classification is challenging due to its sparse and noisy feature space. To address this problem, a novel feature space enriching (FSE) technique based on two semantic knowledge bases is proposed in this paper. The basic idea of FSE is to select the related semantic features that will increase the global information for learning algorithms from the semantic knowledge bases, and use them to enrich the original sparse feature space. The resulting feature space of FSE can provide semantic-richer features for classification algorithms to learn improved classifiers. Naive Bayes and support vector machine are selected as the classification algorithms. Experiments on a bilingual enterprise email dataset have shown that: (1) the FSE technique can improve the email classification accuracy, especially for the sparse classes, (2) the SVM classifier benefits more from FSE than the naive Bayes classifier, (3) with the support of domain knowledge, the FSE technique can be more effective.

Keywords

Email Classification Feature Space Enriching Semantic Knowledge Base 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Whittaker, S., Sidner, C.: Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In: Proc. of the International conference on human factors in Computing Systems (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, W.: Learning rules that classify e-mail. In: Proc. of the 1996 AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning and Information Access (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crawford, E., McCreath, E.: Iems: the intelligent email sorter. In: Proc. of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Provost, J.: Naive-bayes vs. rule-learning in classification of email. The University of Texas at Austin, Artificial Intelligence Lab, Technical Report (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rennie, J.D.: ifile: An application of machine learning to e-mail filtering. In: Proc. of KDD 2000 Text Mining Workshop (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diao, Y., Lu, H., Wu, D.: A comparative study of classification-based personal e-mail filtering. In: Terano, T., Chen, A.L.P. (eds.) PAKDD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1805, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Segal, R., Kephart, J.O.: Mailcat: An intelligent assistant for organizing e-mail. In: Proc. of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Segal, R., Kephart, J.O.: Incremental learning in swiftfile. In: Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baeza-Yates, R.: Ribeiro-Neto: Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press Series/ Addison Wesley, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, G.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communication of ACM 38, 39–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong, Z.: Bigger context and better understanding - expectation on future mt technology. In: Proc. of International Conference on Machine Translation and Computer Language Information Processing (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gelbukh, A., Sidorov, G., Guzman-Arenas, A.: Use of a weighted topic hierarchy for document classification. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P., Ocelíková, J., Sojka, P. (eds.) TSD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1692, pp. 130–135. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, Y., Pedersen, J.O.: A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In: Proc. of the 14th Intl. Conference on Machine Learning (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill Series in Computer Science, The United States (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vapnik, V.N.: Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Chichester (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Platt, J., Cristianini, N., Shawe, J.: Large margin dags for multiclass classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brutlag, J., Meek, C.: Challenges of the email domain for text classification. In: Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zelikovitz, S., Hirsh, H.: Improving short text classification using unlabeled background knowledge. In: Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunming Ye
    • 1
  • Fanyuan Ma
    • 1
  • Hongqiang Rong
    • 2
  • Joshua Huang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.E-Business Technology InstituteThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations