Advertisement

Managing TeX Resources with XML Topic Maps

  • Tomasz Przechlewski
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3130)

Abstract

For many years the Polish TeX Users Group newsletter has been published online on the GUST web site. The repository now contains valuable information on TeX, metafont, electronic document, computer graphics and related subjects. However, access to the content is very poor: it is available as ps/pdf files with only a simple HTML page facilitating navigation. There is no integration with information resources from other sections of the site, nor with the resources from other lug or ctan sites.

Topic maps were initially developed for efficient preparation of indices, glossaries and thesauruses for electronic documents repositories, and are now codified as both the iso standard (iso/iec 13250) and the XTM 1.0 standard. Their applications extend to the domain of electronic publishing. Topic maps and the similar RDF standard are considered to be the backbone of corporate knowledge management systems and/or the Semantic Web [3].

The paper contains an introduction to the Topic Maps standard and discusses selected problems of Topic Map construction. Finally the application of Topic Maps as an interface to the repository of TeX related resources is presented, as well as the successes and challenges encountered in the implementation.

Keywords

Resource Description Framework Related Resource Topic Type Subject Indicator Association Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO/IEC. Topic Maps, ISO/IEC 13250 (2002), http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/
  2. 2.
    Ahmed, K., Ayers, D., Birbeck, M., Cousins, J.: Professional XML Meta Data. Wrox Press (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 35–43 (2001), http://www.sciam.com/2001/0501issue/0501berners-lee.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema (2002), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
  5. 5.
    Carlstedt, A., Nordborg, M.: An evaluation of topic maps. Master’s thesis, Göteborg University (2002), http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl8matsn/exjobb.html
  6. 6.
    Ciancarini, P., Pirruccio, M., Vitali, F.: Metadata on the Web. On the integration of RDF and topic maps. In: Extreme Markup Languages (2003), http://www.mulberrytech.com/Extreme/Proceedings/xslfo-pdf/2003/Presutti01/EML2003Presutti01.pdf
  7. 7.
    Garshol, L.M.: Living with Topic Maps and RDF (2002), http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tmrdf.html
  8. 8.
    Kay, M.: XSLT Programmer’s Reference, 2nd edn. Wrox Press (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ksieżyk, R.: Trying not to get lost with a topic map. In: XML Europe Conference (1999), http://www.infoloom.com/gcaconfs/WEB/granada99/ksi.HTM
  10. 10.
    Lassila, O., Swick, R.R.: Resource description framework (RDF). Model and syntax specification (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/
  11. 11.
    Lin, X., Qin, J.: Building a topic map repository (2000), http://www.knowledgetechnologies.net/proceedings/presentations/lin/xialin.pdf
  12. 12.
    Mahabal, A., George Djorgovski, S., Brunner, R., Williams, R.: Topic maps as a virtual observatory tool (2002), http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0110184
  13. 13.
    Mangano, S.: XSLT Cookbook. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nishikawa, M., Moore, G.: Topic map constraint language requirements (2002), http://www.isotopicmaps.org/tmcl/
  15. 15.
    Park, J., Hunting, S. (eds.): XML Topic Maps. Creating and using Topic Maps for the Web. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pepper, S.: The TAO of topic maps (2000), http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tao.html
  17. 17.
    Pepper, S.: Published subject: Introduction and basic requirements (2003), http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/
  18. 18.
    Pepper, S., Garshol, M.L.: Lessons on applying topic maps (2002), http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/xmlconf.html
  19. 19.
    Pepper, S., Moore, G.: XML topic maps (XTM) 1.0 (2000), http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/
  20. 20.
    Popineau, F.: Directions for the TeXlive systems. In: EuroTEX 2001, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Kerkrade, pp. 152–161. NTG (2001), http://www.ntg.nl/maps/pdf/2620.pdf
  21. 21.
    Przechlewski, T.: Wykorzystanie map pojeć w zarzadzaniu repozytoriami dokumentów elektronicznych. In: Materialy Konferencji: MSK 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rath, H.H.: Semantic resource exploitation with topic maps. In: Proceedings of the GLDV-Spring Meeting 2001 (2001), http://www.uni-giessen.de/fb09/ascl/gldv2001/
  23. 23.
    Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L.: OWL Web ontology language guide (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Przechlewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Uniwersytet Gdański, Wydział ZarzadzaniaSopotPoland

Personalised recommendations