Advertisement

Constructing an Index for Regional Competitiveness

  • Janne Huovari
  • Aki Kangasharju
  • Aku Alanen
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Competitiveness receives a lot of attention. Commentators are often concerned about the loss of competitiveness, and policy actions are motivated by a desire to improve competitiveness. What is typically being referred to is the competitiveness of firms, nations or other geographic areas. The competitiveness of firms differs from that of geographic areas, however, and there is a need to clarify the difference between them.

Keywords

Social Capital Human Capital Gross Domestic Product Personal Income Index Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Alanen A, Huovari J, Kangasharju A (2000) Constructing a new indicator for regional im-pact of innovativeness. In: European Commission (2000) Innovation and enterprise creation: Statistics and indicators. Innovation Papers 18: 229–233Google Scholar
  3. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Begg I (1999) Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies 36: 795–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambridge Econometrics (1998) Regional competitiveness indicators. Final report submitted to DG XVI of the European Commission, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Trade and Industry (1997) Regional competitiveness indicators: A consultation document. LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (1999) Sixth periodic report on the social and economic situation and development of the regions of the European Union. LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman C (1990) Economics of innovation. Edward Elgar, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) Spatial economy. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirschman AO (1958) The strategy for economic development. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  11. International Institute for Management Development (2000). World competitiveness yearbook. LausanneGoogle Scholar
  12. Kajanoja J, Simpura J (2001) Social capital — global and local perspectives. VATT Publications 29, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  13. Kangasharju A, Nijkamp P (2001) Innovation dynamics in space: Local actors and local factors. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35: 31–56Google Scholar
  14. Kangasharju A, Vihriälä V (2000) Laman vaikutus aluekehitykseen. Pellervo Economic Research Institute, Working Papers 39, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  15. Kresl PK (1995) The determinants of urban competitiveness: a survey. In: Kresl PK, Gap-pert G (eds) North American cities and the global economy. Sage, London, pp 45–68Google Scholar
  16. Krugman P (1997) Pop internationalism. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Krugman P (1995) Development, geography and economic theory. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Krugman P (1996) Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12: 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (2000) Index of the Massachusetts innovation economy 2000. Westborough, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  22. Mikkonen K (1995) Kansainvälistyvän Suomen alueelliset menestystekijät. University of Vaasa, Tutkimuksia 190, maantiede 33, VaasaGoogle Scholar
  23. Myrdal G (1957) Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. University Paperbacks, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Ottaviano G, Puga D (1998) Agglomeration in the global economy: A survey of the `New Economic Geography’. The World Economy 21: 707–731Google Scholar
  25. Porter M (1996) Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies and regional policy. International Regional Science Review 19: 85–90Google Scholar
  26. Porter M (1998) Competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Porter M, Stern S (1999) The new challenge to America’s prosperity: Findings from the innovation index. Council on Competitiveness, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Putnam RD (1993) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam RD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siebert H (2000) The paradigm of locational competition. Kiel Discussion Papers 367, Kiel Solow R ( 1956 ) Investment and technical change. In: Arrow K, Karlin S, Suppes P (eds)Google Scholar
  31. Mathematical methods in the social sciences Stanford University Press, Palo Alto StanfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Stern S, Porter M, Furman, JL (2000) The determinants of national innovative capacity. NBER Working Paper 7876, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Swan T (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record 32: 334–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tervo H (1991) Studies on the economic case for and effects of regional policy. Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics 17, JyväskyläGoogle Scholar
  35. World Economic Forum (2000) Global competitiveness report 2000. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janne Huovari
    • 1
  • Aki Kangasharju
    • 2
  • Aku Alanen
    • 3
  1. 1.Pellervo Economic Research InstituteHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Government Institute for Economic ResearchHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Statistics FinlandHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations