Abstract
There is greater awareness among scholars that innovative change is vital to the economic progress of firms and regions. While such change has previously been attributed to large companies (Freeman 1971, 1974), small firms have in fact developed half the new technology in several countries (Acs and Audretsch 1988). In this study, such firms are thought to be vital to the economic progress of economies, as envisioned by Schumpeter (1939), and those that are actively patenting new technology are considered to be key technology firms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acs Z, Audretsch D (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review 78: 678–690
Acs Z, Audretsch D (1990) Innovation and small firms. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Acs Z, Audretsch D, Feldman M. (1994) RandD spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 333–339
Antonelli C (1986) The determinants of the distribution of innovative activity in a metropolitan area. Regional Studies 21: 85–92
Audretsch D (1991) New firm survival and the technological regime. Review of Economics and Statistics November: 441–451
Audretsch D and Acs Z (1991) Innovation and size at the firm level. Southern Economic Journal 57: 739–745
Baldwin J (1995) Innovation: The key to success in small firms. Statistics Canada, Ottawa Baldwin J, Diverty B ( 1995 ) Advanced technology use in Canadian manufacturing sector. Statistics Canada, Ottawa
Baldwin J, Johnson J (1995) Human capital development: The case of training in small and medium sized firms. Statistics Canada, Ottawa
Bathelt H (1989) The evolution of key technology centres in North America: A comparative analysis. Geographische Zeitschrift 77: 89–107
Breschi S (2000) The geography of innovation: A cross-sector analysis. Regional Studies 34: 213–229
Brouwer E, Budil-Nadvornikova H, Kleinknecht H (1999) Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product innovation? An analysis of new product announcements. Regional Studies 33: 541–549
Canadian Key Business Directory. (1975, 1976, 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990, 1993 ) Best Printing, Toronto
Canadian Trade Index. (1975, 1976, 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990 ) Canadian Manufacturers Association, Toronto
Camagni R (ed) (1991) Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. Bellhaven, London.
Ceh B (2001) Regional innovation potential in the United States: Evidence of spatial transformation. Papers in Regional Science 80: 297–316
Ceh B (1997a) The recent evolution of Canadian inventive enterprises. Professional Geographer 49: 64–76
Ceh B (1997b) Technological progress and stability among small Canadian inventive firms. East Lakes Geographer 4: 65–74
Ceh B (1996) Temporal and spatial variability of Canadian inventive companies and their inventions: An issue of ownership. Canadian Geographer 40: 319–337
Ceh B, Hecht A (1990) A spatial examination of inventive activity in Canada: An urban and regional analysis between 1881–1986. Ontario Geography 35: 14–24
Dennis W, Phillips B, Starr E (1994) Small job creation: The findings and their critics. Business Economics 29: 23–24
Dodgson M, Rothwell R (1994) The handbook of industrial innovation. Edward Elgar, Aldershot Hants
Feldman M, Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 210–229
Freeman C (1974) The economic of industrial innovations. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Firestone 0 (1971) Economic implication of patents. University of Ottawa, Ottawa
Intercorporate Ownership Manual ( 1975, 1976, 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990 ) Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs, Ottawa
Isaiah L (1992) Winning strategies for small technology-based companies. Business Quarterly 57: 47–52
Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty M (2000) The meaning of patent citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western reserve survey of patentees. National Bureau of Economic Research, DC, Working Paper W7631
Jaffe A (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidence by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–586.
Kleinknecht A, Poot, P (1992). Do regions matter for RandD? Regional Studies 26: 221–232 Lichtman D, Baker S, Kraus K (2000) Strategic disclosure in the patent system. Vander-built Law Review 53: 2175–2217
Lyons D (1995) Changing business opportunities: The geography of rapidly growing small US private firms, 1982–1992. Professional Geographer 47: 388–398
MacPherson, A (1989) Small manufacturing firms and Canadian industrial development: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 22: 165–185
MacPherson A (1997) The contribution of external service inputs to the product development efforts of small manufacturing firms. RandD Management 27: 127–144
Manseau A, Godin B (2000) Canada’s national system of innovation. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
Mitchelson R (1999) Spatial aspects of technology transfer: Evidence from Kentucky. Southeastern Geographer 39: 206–219
Meyer-Krahmer F (1985) Innovation behaviour and regional indigenous potential. Regional Studies 10: 523–535
Norcliffe G (1994) Regional labour market adjustments: The Canadian case. Canadian Geographer 38: 2–17
North D, Smallbone D (2000) The innovativeness and growth of rural SMEs during the 1990s. Regional Studies 34: 145–157
OECD (1996) Technology, productivity and job creation. OECD, Paris
PATDAT ( 1981, 1989 ) Ministry of Consumer and Corporate Affairs, Ottawa
Pred A (1966) The spatial implications of U.S. urban industrial growth. MIT Press, Massachusetts
Rothwell R, Zegveld W (1985). Reindustrialization and technology. Longmann, London
Schuetze H (1998) How do small firms innovate in British Columbia? In: De La Mothe J, Paquet G (eds) Local and regional systems of innovation. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston
Schumpeter J (1939) Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw Hill, New York
Scotts Directory of Atlantic Manufacturers (1982, 1990–1991) Scotts Directories, Oakville Scotts Directory of Ontario Manufacturers (1975, 1976, 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990 ) Scotts Directories, Oakville
Scotts Directory of Quebec Manufacturers (1975, 1976, 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990 ) Scotts Directories, Oakville
Scotts Directory of Western Manufacturers (1975, 1976, 1981, 1982, 1989, 1990 ) Scotts Directories, Oakville
Shipman A. (1993) Inventors make out. International Management 48: 50–51
Stafford A (1952) Is the rate of inventing declining. American Journal of Sociology 52: 539–545
Statistics Canada ( 1981, 1986, 1991 ) Ministry of Supply and Services, Ottawa
The Patent Records (1975/76, 1981/82, 1989/90, 1990/91, 1999 ) Consumer and Corporate Affairs, Ottawa
Vossen R (1998) Relative strength and weakness of small firms in innovation. International Small Business Journal 16: 88–94
Weyer E, Stain E (1999) Clusters of high technology SMEs: The Dutch case. Regional Studies 33: 391–400
Wheeler J (1990) The new corporate landscape: Americas fastest growing private companies. Professional Geographer 42: 433–444
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ceh, B. (2002). Small Key Tech-Knowledge Firms in Canada: Their Innovation Potential, Structure, and Spatial Adaptation. In: Acs, Z.J., de Groot, H.L.F., Nijkamp, P. (eds) The Emergence of the Knowledge Economy. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24823-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24823-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07835-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24823-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive