Skip to main content
  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

The transformation of organizations into knowledge-intensive and knowledge-aware organizations takes place at an ever-increasing pace. Knowledge as the key resource, not labor, raw material or capital, changes production functions in organizations significantly. Knowledge represents the key concept to explain the increasing velocity of the transformation of social life in general and the way businesses and social institutions work in particular (Drucker 1994). Estimates at leading research organizations suggest that up to 60% of the gross national product in the United States is based on information as opposed to physical goods and services (Delphi 1997, 10). This is not surprising as it is estimated that the knowledge-intensive construction and development process of new products and services potentially determines 80 to 90% of the resulting production costs (Scherrer 1999, 131).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Willke 1998, 21; for a detailed discussion of the concept of knowledge work see section 4.1.3 — “From traditional work to knowledge work” on page 44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennet/Bennet 2003, 15ff, Bennet/Bennet 2003a, 625ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hax (1989, 77) made this latter argument with the background of a US economy then considered weaker than the Japanese economy.

    Google Scholar 

  4. According to a statistic produced by Mergerstat the number of mergers and acquisitions worldwide soared from less than 2,500 involving less than US$100 million in value in 1990 to app. 9,000 in 1999 involving app. US$1,5 billion in value (Späth 2000, 10).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Examples for organizational challenges are to design and implement business processes that span organizations, to support cross-organizational (virtual) teams and work groups, to negotiate appropriability of knowledge generated in cross-organizational projects and to prevent that the organization’s competitive advantages are transferred to competitors. Examples for technological challenges concerning interoperability are to standardize interfaces between or to integrate important knowledge-related information and communication systems, such as experience data bases, document and content management systems, asynchronous and synchronous communication and collaboration tools, to establish shared work spaces for virtual teams across organizational boundaries or to handle access and security of ICT systems.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mobile is understood in a broad sense here. It comprises mobility within and between jobs. Within one organization, employees play multiple roles and participate in multiple projects at the same time often requiring them to switch work environments. Additionally, the duration of projects decreases and employees often take on new job assignments with different co-employees. On the other hand, the duration of employment with one employer decreases and the rate of employees moving to a new city to take on a new job increases. Thus, on the one hand, the networks of employees in terms of the number of people they know in many different organizations might get bigger due to the numerous changes in environments. On the other hand, the intensity of interactions within the networks might decrease.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See also section 6.1.3.3 — “Communities” on page 160.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The u in u-commerce stands for ubiquitous, universal, unique and unison (Watson 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See also Wiig 1993, Nonaka/Takeuchi 1995, Davenport/Prusak 1998, Probst et al. 1998, Bach/Österle 2000, Grothe/Gentsch 2000, Hildebrand 2000, Lehner 2000, Watson 2000, Zerdick et al. 2000, Alavi/Leidner 2001, Gora/Bauer 2001 and the literature cited in section 4.1 - “Knowledge management” on page 19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The influences of the various fields and disciplines on knowledge management are investigated in section 4.1.1 — “From organizational learning to knowledge management” on page 20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a detailed discussion of these ICT technologies and their impact on knowledge management systems see also section 4.3 — “Knowledge management systems” on page 79.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a detailed analysis and a definition of KMS see also section 4.3 — “Knowledge management systems” on page 79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maier, R. (2004). Motivation. In: Knowledge Management Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24779-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24779-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-12163-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24779-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics