Skip to main content

Expressing Domain Variability for Configuration

  • Conference paper
Software Architecture (EWSA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3047))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 943 Accesses

Abstract

Ideally, product development in a product line context should consist of selecting the appropriate components, assembling them and setting their parameters. That is, configuring the components. In industrial contexts, component variability varies exponentially with the hundreds, even thousands of products that are realised. Even such a simple direct configuration process, when applicable, is daunting. The problem is compounded when potential modification of the components or component selection based on their effect on overall product capability are taken into account.

The EU-IST project ConIPF is defining a methodology to support product line product development under these conditions with product configuration methods from artificial intelligence. It has defined CKML (Configuration Knowledge Modelling Language) to combine the aspects of feature and component variability and interaction with the procedural aspects of configuring features and components. This language is used to specify the development support environment and to assess the applicability of commercial configuration tools for that development environment.

This paper describes key elements of the ConIPF methodology and shows its relevance to architectural considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batory, D., O’Malley, S.: The Design and Implementation of Hierarchical Software Systems with Reusable Components. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (October 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch, J.: Design and Use of Software Architectures – Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch, J., Florijn, G., Greefhorst, D., Kuusela, J., Obbink, H., Pohl, K.: Variability Issues in Software Product Lines. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering PFE-4, Bilbao, Spain, October 3-5 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baum, L., Becker, M., Geyer, L., Molter, G.: Mapping Requirements to Reusable Components using Design Spaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE 2000), Schaumburg, Illinois, USA, June 19-23 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czarnecki, K., Eisnecker, U.W.: Generative Programming. Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Günter, A., Kühn, C.: Knowledge-Based Configuration – Survey and Future Directions. In: Puppe, F. (ed.) XPS 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1570, pp. 47–66. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. van Gurp, J., Bosch, J., Svahnberg, M.: On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IFIP/IEEE Conference on Software Architecture (August 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hein, A., MacGregor, J., Thiel, S.: Configuring Software Product Line Features. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Feature Interaction in Composed Systems, 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2001), Budapes, Hungary, June 18-22 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA). Feasibility Study, Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K.: FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain- Specific Reference Architectures. Annals of Software Engineering 5, 143–168 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process – An Introduction, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Männistö, T., Soininen, T., Sulonen, R.: Product Configuration View to Software Product Families. In: Software Configuration Workshop (SCM-19), Toronto, Canada (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Svahnberg, M., Van Gurp, J., Bosch, J.: A Taxonomy of Variability Realization Techniques, Technical Paper ISSN: 1103-1581, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thiel, S., Hein, A.: Systematic Integration of Variability into Product Line Architecture Design. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 130–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

MacGregor, J. (2004). Expressing Domain Variability for Configuration. In: Oquendo, F., Warboys, B.C., Morrison, R. (eds) Software Architecture. EWSA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3047. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24769-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24769-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22000-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24769-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics