Abstract
Never since Marshall’s seminal work on locational choice and industrial districts has the cluster idea been given more prominence than in the last decade, prominence that was in particular triggered by Porter (1990) and Enright (1990). This is not too surprising since “... both, firms keen to improve their competitiveness, and governments keen to exploit new sources of economic growth, need to understand how innovation works in order to better stimulate it”(OECD 1999). And there are many indications that, increasingly, regional growth and innovation seem to emerge from innovative complexes of firms and organizations. It is argued that it is primarily within these geographically concentrated networks or “clusters”, that regional value-added and employment growth are realized. “Policymakers care about industrial clusters and their geographical location, since clusters are associated with rents. Membership of clusters and inter-firm networks is strongly believed to enhance the productivity, and competitive performance of firms” (Forslid and Midelfart Knarvik 2002:2). It is widely recognized now that prominent clusters like California’s Silicon Valley or Boston’s Route 128 are just two examples of many clusters around the world. Regional governments have tried to imitate successful formations of innovative clusters, thereby entering into heavy competition for mobile capital and highly skilled labor. At the center of scientific and political interest are new growth sectors such as information technology, biotechnology, environmental technology and multimedia. It is discussed whether the externalities inherent in these cluster-intensive industries are strong enough to bring (regional) economies onto a higher growth path and what institutions are needed to capture the growth opportunities that these industries provide.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Enright MJ (1990) Geographic Concentration and Industrial Organization. Harvard University, Cambridge MA
Forslid R, Midelfart Knarvik KH (2002) Globalization, Industrial Policy and Clusters. CEPR Discussion Paper 3129
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (1999) Boosting Innovation: the Cluster Approach. OECD, Paris
Porter ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bröcker, J., Dohse, D., Soltwedel, R. (2003). Clusters and Competition as Engines of Innovation—An Introduction. In: Bröcker, J., Dohse, D., Soltwedel, R. (eds) Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24760-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24760-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05677-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24760-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive