Skip to main content

An Ontology-Composition Algebra

  • Chapter
Handbook on Ontologies

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

Summary

The need for an algebra to manipulate ontologies is motivated by the impossibility of achieving a globally consistent ontology. Our approach is to integrate information from diverse sources by focusing on the intersection of their ontologies and articulating them accordingly. These articulations typically require rules to define semantic correspondences like synonymy, homonymy, hypernymy, overlapping semantics, and abstraction among the terms of interest. The algebra, needed to compose multiple articulations, has to manipulate the ontologies based on these articulation rules.

The properties of the operators depend upon those of the articulation generation function deployed. The necessary and sufficient conditions that must be satisfied by the articulation generating function in order for the algebraic operators to satisfy properties like commutativity, associativity and distributivity have been identified in this work. Based on whether these properties are satisfied, a task of composing multiple ontologies can be expressed as multiple equivalent algebraic expressions. Using a cost model, the most optimal algebraic expression can be chosen and executed to derive the composed ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wiederhold, G. (1994) An algebra for ontology composition. In: Monterey Workshop on Formal Methods., Naval Postgraduate School, 56–61

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Rahm, E. (2002) Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, (ICDE), San Jose, California.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doan, A., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.Y. (2001) Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: A machine-learning approach. In: SIGMOD.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E. (2001) Generic schema matching with cupid. In: 27th Intl. Conf. VLDB, Roma, Italy, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noy, N., Musen, M. (2000) Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In: 7th Natl. Conf. of AAAI-2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks, F.P. (1995). The Mythical Man-Month, Addison Wesley, 1975, reprinted’95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chalupsky, H., Hove, E., and Russ, T. (1997) Presentation on Ontology Alignment at ad hoc group on ontology, NCITS.TC.T2 ANSI.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, T.R., (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, T. R. (1993) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Talk Padua workshop on Formal Ontology, March. Ed. Nicola Guarino.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guha, R.V. (1991) Contexts: A formalization and some application, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. Also Technical Report Number ACT-CYC-42391.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Humphreys, B. and Lindberg, D. (1993) The project: Making the conceptual connection between users and the information they need, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1993, see also http://www.lexical.com

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lenat, D., and Guha R.V. (1990) Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliver D.E., Shahar, Y., Shortliffe E.H., and Musen, M.A. (1998) Representation of Change on Controlled Medical Terminologies, In Proc. AMIA Conference, October.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teknowledge (1997) High-Performance Knowledge-Bases (HPKB), maintained by Teknowledge Corp. for the DARPA, http://www.teknowledge.com/HPKB.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hendler J., Berners-Lee T, and Miller E. (2001) The Semantic Web“. In Scientific American. May. http://www.scientificamerican.com/2001/0501issue/0501berners- lee.html

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones T.C. (1998) Estimating Software Costs; McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lenat, D. B. (1995) Cyc: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38, no. 11 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitra P., Kersten M. and Wiederhold G. (2000) Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology Interdependencies. Proc. 7th Extending Database Technology, EDBT.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mitra P., Wiederhold G., and Jannink J. (1999) Semi-automatic Integration of Knowl edge Sources. In Proceedings of Fusion ‘89, Sunnyvale, USA, July.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gysenns M., Paredaens J., Van den Bussche J., and van Gucht D. (1994) A graph-oriented object database model. In IEEE Trans. on KDE, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 572–586.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mitra P., Wiederhold G., and Decker S. (2001) A Scalable Framework for Interoperation of Information Sources. 1st Int. Semantic Web Working Symp. (SWWS ‘01).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mitra P., http://www-db.stanford.edu/ - prasen9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boole, G. (1854) An investigation into the Laws of Thought, on Which are founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McGuiness, D.L., Fikes R., Rice, J., and Wilder, S. (2000) The Chimaera Ontology Environment. Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Camara, G., Fonseca, F., and Monteiro A.M. (2002) Algebraic Structures For Spatial Ontologies. Poster at GlScience 2002, Boulder, CO, USA, Annals, AAG, September 25–28, http://www.dpi. inpe.br/gilberto/papers/ontologiesjiscience2002.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bernstein, P.A. (2003) Applying Model Management to Classical Meta Data Problems, Proc. CIDR 2003 pp. 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bernstein, P.A., Levy, A.Y., and Pottinger, R.A., A Vision for Management of Complex Models, Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2000–53, June.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G. (2004). An Ontology-Composition Algebra. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24750-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics