Skip to main content

Knowledge Management in Action?

  • Chapter
Handbook on Knowledge Management 1

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter is structured in two main parts. The first part offers a brief, and self-admittedly stylized, overview and critique of dominant approaches to knowledge management and its links with innovation. Adopting a view of knowledge as socially constructed, it concludes from this that, where the specific purpose is innovation, then action concerns need to be as critical to knowledge management as cognitive or decision concerns. The second part draws upon a case study example to begin to draw out some key issues from a more action-oriented approach to knowledge management. This suggests, first, that innovation is often, by nature, a highly interactive process requiring knowledge and expertise from different functions and layers across the organization. In such cases critical problems concern the integration of knowledge across disparate, sometimes loosely formed, social groups and communities, rather than the accumulation of knowledge within communities. Second that if knowledge integration is to develop, then a more action-oriented perspective on knowledge management and the development of associated tools and technologies may be needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alavi, M. and D. Leidner, “Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges and Benefits,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 1, Article 7, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. “Talking in Organizations: Managing Identity and Impressions in an Advertising Agency,” Organization Studies, 15, 4, 1994, 535 - 563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and D. Karreman, “Odd Couple: The Contradictions of Knowledge Management,” Journal of Management Studies, 38, 7, 2001, 995 - 1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amidon, D.M., “The Evolving Community of Knowledge Practice: The Ken Awakening,” International Journal of Technology Management, 16, 1998, 45 - 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. and D. A. Schon, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W.E., T. Hughes, and T.J. Pinch (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, London: MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F., “Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation,” Organization Studies, 16, 6) 1995, 16 - 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F., M. Reed, and A. Whitaker, “Editorial Introduction: Knowledge Workers and Contemporary Organizations,” Journal of Management Studies, 30, 6, 1993, 851 - 861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, R.J. and R.V. Tenkasi, “Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing,” Organization Science, 6, 4, 1995, 350 - 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B., “The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time,” Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 17, 1991, 475 - 482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., “The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality: Decisions, Ideologies and Organizational Actions, Journal of Management Studies, 19, 8, 1982, 29 - 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chumer, M., R. Hull, and C. Prichard, “Situating Discussions about ‘Knowledge’,” in Prichard, C.; Hull, R.; Chumer, M. and Wilmott, H. (eds), Managing Knowledge, London: Macmillan, 2000, 1 - 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C. and T. Jelassi, Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective, Chichester: John Wiley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., “A Theory of Information Systems Based on Improvisation,” in Currie, W. and Galliers, R. (eds.), Rethinking Management Information Systems. Oxford: OUP, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. and G. Salaman, “The Management Guru as Organizational Witch Doctor,” Organization, 3, 1996, 85 - 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., “Knowledge Management’s Killer Applications,” Training and Development, 52, 1, 1998, 50 - 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole-Gomolski, B., “Users Loathe to Share Their Know-How,” Computerworld, 31, 46, 1997, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and J.G. March, Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., S.L. Jarvenpaa, and M.C. Beers, “Improving Knowledge Work Processes,” Sloan Management Review, Summer, 1996, 53 - 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sanctis, G. and M.S. Poole, “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science, 5, 2, 1994, 121 - 147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. “The Coming of the New Organization,” Harvard Business Review, January-February, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J.F. and J. King, “Examining the Computing Centralization Debate,” Communications of the ACM, 34, 1991, 63 - 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., “Toward a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1996, 109 - 122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., “Knowledge and Organization,” in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. (eds.), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utlization, London: Sage, 2001, 145 - 169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.T., “The Search Transfer Problem: The role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organizational Sub-Units,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1999, 82 - 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.T., N. Nohria, and T. Tierney, “What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?” Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1999, 106 - 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander, “What Firms Do?: Co-ordination, Identity and Learning,” Organization Science, 7, 1996, 502 - 518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., Wellsprings of Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. and J. March, J.,”The Myopia of Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, 1993, 95 - 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, J, J., “Open Sourcing,” European Conference on Information Systems, Vienna, July, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus. L., “Knowledge Management,” Warwick Business School Seminar Series, University of Warwick, August, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., “Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management,” California Management Review, 41, 1999, 103 - 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, I., Creative Technological Change. London: Routledge, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E., “New Treatments or Old Remedies: Is Business Process Reengineering Really Socio-Technical Design?” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 3, 4, 1994, 313 - 326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal, “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, 1998, 242 - 266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., H. Scarbrough, J. Swan, and D. Hislop, “Intranets and Knowledge Management: De-Centred Technologies and the Limits of Technological Discourse,” in Prichard, C.; Hull, R.; Chumer, M. and Wilmott, H. (eds.), Managing Knowledge, London: Macmillan, 2000, 88 - 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, 5, 1994, 14-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., R. Toyama, and N. Konnon, “Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation,” in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. (eds.), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utlization, London: Sage, 2001, 13 - 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J., J. Yates, K. Okamura,M. Fujimoto, “Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use, ” Organization Science, 6, 4, 1995, 423 - 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlokowski, W.J., “Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective,” Information Systems Research, 7, 1, 1996, 63 - 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr. J., Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job, Ithaca, NY: IRL Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusak, L., Knowledge in Organizations, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintas, P., “Knowledge Management: A Strategic Agenda,” Long Range Planning, 30, 1997, 385 - 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, The McDonaldization of Society, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G., Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarvary, M., “Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry,” California Management Review, 41, 1999, 95 - 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H., “The Management of Knowledge Workers,” in Currie, W. and Galliers, R. (eds.), Rethinking Management Information Systems, Oxford: OUP, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H. and J.M. Corbett, Technology and Organization: Power, Meaning and Design, London: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H. and J. Swan, “Explaining the Diffusion of Knowledge Management.” British Journal of Management, 12, 2001, 3 - 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, G., H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. Van de Veide, and B. Wielinga, Knowledge Engineering and Management, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, U. and B. Vandenbosch, “Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don’t,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 8, 2, 1998, 127 - 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seely Brown, J. and P. Duguid, “Structure and Sponteneity: Knowledge and Organization,” in Nonaka, I. and Teece, D. (eds.), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utlization, London: Sage, 2000, 44 - 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadbolt, N. and N. Milton, “From Knowledge Engineering to Knowledge Management,” British Journal of Management, 10, 1999, 309 - 322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starburck, W., “Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms,” Journal of Management Studies, 34, 1992, 389 - 414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. and P. Clark, “Organizational Decision-Making in the Appropriation of Technological Innovation: Cognitive and Political Dimensions,” European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 2, 1992, 103 - 127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. and H. Scarbrough, “Knowledge, Purpose and Process: Linking Knowledge Management and Innovation,” HICSS Conference, Maui, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J., S. Newell, H. Scarbrough, and D. Hislop, “Knowledge Management and Innovation: Networks and Networking,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 1999, 262 - 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson E.B., “Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations,” Management Science, 40, 9, 1996, 1069 - 1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., “Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison,” in Tajfel, H. (ed.) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Behaviour. London: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. “The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: A Constructionist Perspective,” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1996, 11 - 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. and E. Vladimirou, “What Is Organizational Knowledge,” Journal of Management Studies, 38, 7, 2001, 973 - 994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbosch, B. and M. Ginzberg, “Lotus Notes and Collaboration: Plus CA Change,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 1996, 65 - 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E., “Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies,” in P.S. Goodman, L.S. Sproull and Associates (ed.) Technology and Organisations, Oxford: Jossey-Bass, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikstrom, S., and R. Normann, Knowledge and Value. London: Routledge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swan, J. (2004). Knowledge Management in Action?. In: Holsapple, C.W. (eds) Handbook on Knowledge Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20005-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24746-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics