Abstract
The speed of the collapse of central planning in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union was one of the most startling political events of the second half of the twentieth century. No-one really knew how long the process of stabilisation and adjustment would take. What was clear, however, was that the international community would not just sit back and let it happen. Substantial resource transfers took place as well as extensive policy advice. The European Union was in the vanguard of this post-Communist reconstruction effort with both financial aid through programmes such as PHARE and policy initiatives such as the Europe Agreements. The latter not only elevated the central and east European countries (CEECs) to the apex of the Union’s ‘pyramid of privilege’ but laid the foundations for progress towards eventual accession. By the middle of 1996, ten CEECs had applied for membership of the Union; in 1998 serious negotiations over entry began; and in December 2000 a formal Treaty commitment was made at the Nice Summit. The most recent Commission report on readiness for accession (in October 2002), concluded that eight of the ten CEECs will be ready to join the EU in 2004.
We are grateful to Simon Harrington at the Office for National Statistics for advice on the data and to Heinz Herrmann, Christian Wey and Eric Strobl for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper. Financial support from the Leverhulme Trust under Programme Grant F114/BF is gratefully acknowledged
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baldwin, R. 1994. Towards an integrated Europe, London: CEPR.
Baltagi, B.H. 1995. Econometric analysis of panel data, New York: Wiley.
Barrell, R. and D. Holland. 2000. Foreign direct investment and enterprise restructuring in Central Europe, Economics of Transition, Vol. 8, pp. 477–504.
Barrios, S., H. Görg and E. Strobl. 2001. Multinational enterprises and new trade theory:
Evidence for the convergence hypothesis, CEPR Discussion Paper 2827.
Brainard, S.L. 1997. An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off be- tween multinational sales and trade, American Economic Review, Vol. 87, pp. 520–544.
Brenton, P., F. DiMauro and M. Lücke. 1999. Economic integration and FDI: An empiricalanalysis of foreign investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe, Empirica, 26, pp. 95–121.
Carr, D.L., J.R. Markusen and K.E. Maskus. 2001. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 693–708.
Deardorff, A.V. 1998. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? in J. Frankel (ed.) The Regionalisation of the World Economy ( Chicago, University of Chicago Press ).
Driffield, N. 2001. The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK, The Manchester School,. 69, pp. 103–119.
Eaton, J. and S. Kortum. 2001. Technology, Geography and Trade (mimeo Boston University, forthcoming Econometrica).
Egger, P. 2002. An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials, The World Economy, 25, pp. 297–312.
Francois, J. and Rombout, M. 2001. Trade Effects from the Integration of the Central and east European Countries into the European Union, Sussex European Institute Paper No. 41., University of Sussex.
Girma, S. 2002. The process of European integration and the determinants of entry by non-EU multinationals in UK manufacturing, The Manchester School, Vol. 70, pp. 315–335.
Girma, S. and H. Görg. 2002a. Foreign ownership, returns to scale and productivity: Evidence from UK manufacturing establishments, CEPR Discussion Paper 3503.
Girma, S. and H. Görg. 2002b. Foreign direct investment, spillovers and absorptive capacity: Evidence from quantile regressions, GEP Research Paper 02/14, University of Nottingham.
Girma, S., D. Greenaway and K. Wakelin. 2001. Who benefits from foreign direct invest- ment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48, pp. 119–133.
Greenaway, D. and C.R. Milner. 2002. Regionalism and Gravity, Scottish Journal of Politi- cal Economy, 49, pp. 574–585.
Gros, D. and A. Gonciarz. 1996. A note on the trade potential of Central and Eastern Europe, European Journal of Political Economy, 12, pp. 709–721.
Hamilton, C.B. and L.A. Winters. 1992. Opening up international trade with Eastern Europe, Economic Policy, 14, pp. 77–116.
Harrigan, J. 2002. Specialisation and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws? In K. Choi and J. Harrigan, eds. The Handbook of International Trade. Oxford, Blackwell, forthcoming.
Lipsey, R.E. 2001. Foreign direct investment and the operations of multinational firms: Concepts, history, and data, NBER Working Paper 8665.
Markusen, J.R. 1997. Trade versus investment liberalization, NBER Working Paper 6231. Markusen, J.R. 1998. Multinational firms, location and trade. The World Economy, 21, pp. 733–757.
Markusen, J.R. and A.J. Venables. 1998. Multinational firms and the new trade theory. Journal of International Economics, 46, pp. 183–203.
Markusen, J.R., A.J. Venables, D. Eby-Konan and K.H. Zhang. 1996. A unified treatment of horizontal direct investment, vertical direct investment, and the pattern of trade in goods and services, NBER Working Paper 5696.
Meyer, K.E. and C. Pind. 1999. The slow growth of foreign direct investment in the Soviet Union successor states, Economics of Transition, 7, pp. 201–214.
Nilsson, L. 2000. Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria, European Journal of Political Economy, 16, pp. 807–827.
Pain, N. 1997. Continental drift: European integration and the location of U.K. foreign direct investment, The Manchester School, 65, pp. 94–117.
Pain, N. 1993. An econometric analysis of foreign direct investment in the United Kingdom, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 40, pp. 1–23.
Sinn, H.W. and A.J. Weichenrieder. 1997. Foreign direct investment, political resentment and the privatization process in Eastern Europe, Economic Policy, 24, pp. 179–210. UN. 1999. World Investment Report 1999, Geneva: United Nations
Cieslik, A. and M. Ryan. 2002. EU Enlargement and Japanese Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe, Mimeo.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Görg, H., Greenaway, D., Wey, C. (2003). Is there a Potential for Increases in FDI for Central and Eastern European Countries Following EU Accession?. In: Herrmann, H., Lipsey, R. (eds) Foreign Direct Investment in the Real and Financial Sector of Industrial Countries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24736-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24736-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53437-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24736-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive