Skip to main content

Is there a Potential for Increases in FDI for Central and Eastern European Countries Following EU Accession?

  • Conference paper
Foreign Direct Investment in the Real and Financial Sector of Industrial Countries

Abstract

The speed of the collapse of central planning in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union was one of the most startling political events of the second half of the twentieth century. No-one really knew how long the process of stabilisation and adjustment would take. What was clear, however, was that the international community would not just sit back and let it happen. Substantial resource transfers took place as well as extensive policy advice. The European Union was in the vanguard of this post-Communist reconstruction effort with both financial aid through programmes such as PHARE and policy initiatives such as the Europe Agreements. The latter not only elevated the central and east European countries (CEECs) to the apex of the Union’s ‘pyramid of privilege’ but laid the foundations for progress towards eventual accession. By the middle of 1996, ten CEECs had applied for membership of the Union; in 1998 serious negotiations over entry began; and in December 2000 a formal Treaty commitment was made at the Nice Summit. The most recent Commission report on readiness for accession (in October 2002), concluded that eight of the ten CEECs will be ready to join the EU in 2004.

We are grateful to Simon Harrington at the Office for National Statistics for advice on the data and to Heinz Herrmann, Christian Wey and Eric Strobl for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper. Financial support from the Leverhulme Trust under Programme Grant F114/BF is gratefully acknowledged

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldwin, R. 1994. Towards an integrated Europe, London: CEPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B.H. 1995. Econometric analysis of panel data, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, R. and D. Holland. 2000. Foreign direct investment and enterprise restructuring in Central Europe, Economics of Transition, Vol. 8, pp. 477–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, S., H. Görg and E. Strobl. 2001. Multinational enterprises and new trade theory:

    Google Scholar 

  • Evidence for the convergence hypothesis, CEPR Discussion Paper 2827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S.L. 1997. An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off be- tween multinational sales and trade, American Economic Review, Vol. 87, pp. 520–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, P., F. DiMauro and M. Lücke. 1999. Economic integration and FDI: An empiricalanalysis of foreign investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe, Empirica, 26, pp. 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D.L., J.R. Markusen and K.E. Maskus. 2001. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A.V. 1998. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? in J. Frankel (ed.) The Regionalisation of the World Economy ( Chicago, University of Chicago Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N. 2001. The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK, The Manchester School,. 69, pp. 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. and S. Kortum. 2001. Technology, Geography and Trade (mimeo Boston University, forthcoming Econometrica).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P. 2002. An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials, The World Economy, 25, pp. 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois, J. and Rombout, M. 2001. Trade Effects from the Integration of the Central and east European Countries into the European Union, Sussex European Institute Paper No. 41., University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S. 2002. The process of European integration and the determinants of entry by non-EU multinationals in UK manufacturing, The Manchester School, Vol. 70, pp. 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S. and H. Görg. 2002a. Foreign ownership, returns to scale and productivity: Evidence from UK manufacturing establishments, CEPR Discussion Paper 3503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S. and H. Görg. 2002b. Foreign direct investment, spillovers and absorptive capacity: Evidence from quantile regressions, GEP Research Paper 02/14, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., D. Greenaway and K. Wakelin. 2001. Who benefits from foreign direct invest- ment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48, pp. 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D. and C.R. Milner. 2002. Regionalism and Gravity, Scottish Journal of Politi- cal Economy, 49, pp. 574–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros, D. and A. Gonciarz. 1996. A note on the trade potential of Central and Eastern Europe, European Journal of Political Economy, 12, pp. 709–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C.B. and L.A. Winters. 1992. Opening up international trade with Eastern Europe, Economic Policy, 14, pp. 77–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. 2002. Specialisation and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws? In K. Choi and J. Harrigan, eds. The Handbook of International Trade. Oxford, Blackwell, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R.E. 2001. Foreign direct investment and the operations of multinational firms: Concepts, history, and data, NBER Working Paper 8665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. 1997. Trade versus investment liberalization, NBER Working Paper 6231. Markusen, J.R. 1998. Multinational firms, location and trade. The World Economy, 21, pp. 733–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. and A.J. Venables. 1998. Multinational firms and the new trade theory. Journal of International Economics, 46, pp. 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R., A.J. Venables, D. Eby-Konan and K.H. Zhang. 1996. A unified treatment of horizontal direct investment, vertical direct investment, and the pattern of trade in goods and services, NBER Working Paper 5696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. and C. Pind. 1999. The slow growth of foreign direct investment in the Soviet Union successor states, Economics of Transition, 7, pp. 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. 2000. Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria, European Journal of Political Economy, 16, pp. 807–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, N. 1997. Continental drift: European integration and the location of U.K. foreign direct investment, The Manchester School, 65, pp. 94–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, N. 1993. An econometric analysis of foreign direct investment in the United Kingdom, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 40, pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.W. and A.J. Weichenrieder. 1997. Foreign direct investment, political resentment and the privatization process in Eastern Europe, Economic Policy, 24, pp. 179–210. UN. 1999. World Investment Report 1999, Geneva: United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslik, A. and M. Ryan. 2002. EU Enlargement and Japanese Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Görg, H., Greenaway, D., Wey, C. (2003). Is there a Potential for Increases in FDI for Central and Eastern European Countries Following EU Accession?. In: Herrmann, H., Lipsey, R. (eds) Foreign Direct Investment in the Real and Financial Sector of Industrial Countries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24736-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24736-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53437-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24736-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics