Market Inefficiencies in Player Head to Head Betting on the 2003 Cricket World Cup

  • Michael J. Bailey
  • Stephen R. Clarke


The first official one-day International cricket match (ODI) was played at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on January 5 1971 between Australia and England. Since the inception of limited over cricket, there have been various rule changes, although general principles have remained the same. Both sides bat once for a limited time (maximum 50 overs) with the aim in the first innings to score as many runs as possible, and in the second innings to score more than the target set in the first innings. Prior to the 2003 World Cup, 16 countries had played 1936 official ODIs, although 95% of all matches have been played by 9 main cricketing nations (Australia, England, India, Pakistan, West Indies, Sri Lanka, New Zealand, South Africa and Zimbabwe). Just over 1200 cricketers have represented their country in ODIs.


Exponential Smoothing Average Absolute Error Match Time Player Performance Market Inefficiency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bailey, M. Identifying arbitrage opportunities in AFL betting markets through mathematical modelling. In G. Cohen and T. Langtry (editors). Proceedings of the Fifth Australian conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport. Sydney, University of Technology Sydney: 37–42. 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benter, W. Computer Based Horse race handicapping and wagering systems: a report. In L. Hausch (editor). Efficiency of racetrack betting markets. pp 183–198. Ziemba. San Diego, Academic Press Limited. 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolton, R. N. and R. G. Chapman. A Multinomial Logit Model For Hand-icapping Horse Races. In L. Hausch (editor). Efficiency of Racetrack betting markets. pp 151–172. Ziemba. San Diego, Academic press limited. 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chapman, R. G. Still searching for positive returns at the track: Empirical results from 2,000 Hong Kong Races. In L. Hausch (editor). Efficiency of race-track betting markets. pp173–183. Ziemba. San Diego, Academic Press Limited. 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke, S. R. Test Statistics. In J. Bennett (editor). Statistics in Sport, pp 83–101.Arnold, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dana, J. D. and M. M. Knetter. Learning and efficiency in a gambling market. Management Science 40(10): 1317–1328. 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dixon, M. J. and S. G. Coles. Modelling Association football scores and in-efficiencies in the UK football betting market. Applied Statistics 46: 265–280. 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elderton, W. E. Cricket scores and some skew correlation distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 108: 1–11. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly, J. A New Interpretation of Information Rate. Bell System Technical Journal 35: 917–926. 1956.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kimber, A. C. and A. R. Hansford. A statistical analysis of batting in cricket. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 156(3): 443–445. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wood, G. H. What do we mean by consistency? The Cricketer Annual: 22–28. 1941.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood, G. H. Cricket scores and geometrical progression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 108: 12–22. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Bailey
    • 1
  • Stephen R. Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Swinburne UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations