Using Indexed-Sequential Geometric Glyphs to Explore Visual Patterns

  • Jim Morey
  • Kamran Sedig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3038)

Abstract

This paper presents a visualization tool called PolygonR&D for exploring visual tiling patterns. To facilitate the exploration process, PolygonR&D uses dynamically-generated, interactive geometric glyph visualizations that intermediate reasoning between the sequential textual code and the parallel visual structure of the tilings. Sequential textual code generates indexed-sequential geometric glyphs. Not only does each glyph represent one procedure in the sequential code, but also a constituent element of the visual pattern. Users can reason with a sequence of glyphs to explore how tiling patterns are constructed. Alternatively, they can interact with glyphs to semantically unpack them. Glyphs also contain symbolic referents to other glyphs helping users see how all procedures work together to generate a tiling pattern. Experimenting with indexed-sequential glyphs in tools such as PolygonR&D can help us understand how to design interactive cognitive tools that support reciprocal reasoning between sentential and visual structures.

Keywords

Local Neighbourhood Visual Pattern Regular Polygon Information Visualization Alternative Construction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Devlin, K.: Mathematics: The Science of Patterns. Freeman and Company, NY (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grunbaum, B., Shephard, G.C.: Tilings and Patterns: An Introduction. W.H. Freeman, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sedig, K., Morey, J., Mercer, R., Wilson, W.: Visualizing, interacting and experimenting with lattices using a diagrammatic representation. In: Malcolm, G. (ed.) Multidisciplinary Approaches to Visual Representations and Interpretations, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peterson, D. (ed.): Forms of representation. Intellect Books, Exeter (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sedig, K., Rowhani, S., Morey, J., Liang, H.: Application of information visualization techniques to the design of a mathematical mindtool: A usability study. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Information Visualization 2(3), 142–146 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth 10000 words. In: Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N.H., Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives, The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Myers, K., Konolige, K.: Reasoning with analogical representations. In: Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N.H., Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives, The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Post, F.J., van Walsum, T., Post, F.H.: Iconic techniques for feature visualization. In: Proc. Visualization, pp. 288–295. IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ribarsky, W., Ayers, E., Eble, J., Mukherjea, S.: Glyphmaker: Creating customized visualization of complex data. IEEE Computer 27(7), 57–64 (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spence, R.: Information Visualization. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Morey
    • 1
  • Kamran Sedig
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive Engineering Laboratory, Department of Computer ScienceThe University of Western OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations