Organizational Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Capabilities in E-government: An Empirical Study

  • Soonhee Kim
  • Hyangsoo Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3035)

Abstract

E-government, a concept that emerged in the late 1990s, is facing challenging opportunities for improving public service delivery to individual citizens. The Internet, the World Wide Web, and other digital tools are transforming the ways in which business, the public, and government communicate, and altering citizen demand for government service delivery [6, 32]. Public expectations for fast and convenient service delivery and institutional needs for efficiency are motivating agencies to experiment with e-government ventures[4]. Modesitt[27] and Greeves[18] are among a growing number of researchers taking note of government use of the Internet, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Web technologies to establish external collaboration, civic engagement, networking, and customer service. E-government services are clearly expanding and will continue to do so; the speed at which the expansion occurs will be limited only by the speed at which technical and financial capacities evolve and organizational/managerial philosophies emerge.

References

  1. 1.
    Argote, L., Epple, D.: Learning Curves In Manufacturing. Science 247(23), 920–924 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argyris, C., Schon, D.: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach. Addison Wesley, Reading (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Branscomb, L.M., Thomas, J.C.: Ease of Use: A System Design Challenge. IBM Systems Journal (23), 224–235 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Center for Technology in Government (1999), Some Assembly Required: Building A Digital Government For The 21st Century. Report of a Multidisciplinary Workshop Held in October 1998, Online. Available At http://www.Ctg.Albany.Edu/Resources/Abstract/Abdgfinalreport.Html (accessed March 1, 2001)
  5. 5.
    Cook, J., Wall, T.: New Work Attitude Measure of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology 53, 39–52 (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Council for Excellence in Government (2000), E-Government: The Next American Revolution, Available At http://www.Excelgov.Org (accessed March 2001)
  7. 7.
    Creed, W.E., Miles, R.E.: Trust In Organizations: A Conceptual Framework Linking Organizational Forms, Managerial Philosophies, And The Opportunity Costs Of Controls. In: Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T.R. (eds.) Trust In Organizations: Frontiers Of Theory And Research, pp. 16–38. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davenport, T., Delong, D., Beers, M.: Successful Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review 39, 43–57 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davenport, T., Jarvenpaa, S., Beers, M.: Improving Knowledge Work Processes. Sloan Management Review 37, 53–65 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davenport, T., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davenport, T., Klahr, P.: Managing Customer Support Knowledge. California Management Review 40(3), 195–208 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delong, D.: Building The Knowledge-Based Organization: How Culture Drives Knowledge Behaviors. Working Paper, Ernst & Young’s Center for Business Innovation, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duncan, R.: Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(3), 313–327 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dyer, J.: Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs And Maximize Transaction Value. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 535–556 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gang, E.: Access to the Internet in Asia. Chosun Daily Newspaper in South Korea, July 24 (2002), Available At http://www.Chosun.Co.Kr/W21data/Html/News/200207/200207240028.Html (assessed July 2002)
  16. 16.
    Gold, A., Malhotra, A., Segars, A.: Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1), 185–214 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grant, R.: Toward Knowledge Based Theory Of The Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109–122 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greeves, R.: The Penultimate Mile: Local And State Government Collaborating To Serve Citizens Through Information Technology, Council Of Excellenc In Government (2000), Available at http://www.excelgov.org/techcon/
  19. 19.
    Hage, J., Aiken, M.: Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 79–80 (June 1967)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inkpen, A., Beamish, P.: Knowledge, Bargaining Power, And the Instability of International Joint Ventures. Academy Of Management Review 22(1), 177–202 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanter, R., Stein, B., Jock, T.: The Challenge Of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It And Leaders Guide It. The Free Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, S., Kim, D.: South Korean Public Officials’ Perceptions of Values, Failure, and Consequences of Failure in E-Government Leadership. Public Performance And Management Review 26(4), 360–375 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King, W.: Integrating Knowledge Management Into IS Strategy. Information Systems Management 16(4), 70–72 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leonard, D.: Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leonard, D., Sensiper, S.: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review 40(3), 112–132 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mcdermott, R.A.: Why Information Technology Inspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review 41(4), 108 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Modesitt, C.: Bridging the Gap between Citizens and Local Government with Information Technology: Concepts and Case Studies. National Civic League (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics Of Innovation? Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    O’Dell, C., Grayson, C.: If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification And Transfer Of Internal Best Practices. California Management Review 40(3), 154–174 (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quigley, E.J., Debons, A.: Interrogative Theory of Information and Knowledge. In: Proceedings of SIGCPR 1999, pp. 4–10. ACM Press, New Orleans (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ruggles, R.: The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice. California Management Review 40(3) (1998)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strover, S., Straubhaar, J.D.: Assessing Citizen Utilization of E-Government Services: A Survey of Issues and Attitudes in Texas. Government Finance Review 16(5), 27 (2000)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Teece, D.: Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-how and Intangible Assets. California Management Review 40(3), 55–79 (1998)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Teigland, R.: Communities of Practice at an Internet Firm: Netovation vs. On-Time Performance. In: Lesser, E.L., Fontaine, M.A., Slusher, J.A. (eds.) Knowledge and Communities, pp. 151–178. Butterworth, Beinemann (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thurow, L.C.: Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-Based Economy, Harper Business (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    United Nations and American Society for Public Administration (2001), Global Survey of E-Government, Available At http://www.Unpan.Org/Egovernment2.Asp (accessed December 2002)
  37. 37.
    Von Krogh, G.: Care in Knowledge Creation. California Management Review 40(3), 133–153 (1998)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wenger, E.: Knowledge Directions. The Journal of the Institute for Knowledge Management 1, 48–63 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soonhee Kim
    • 1
  • Hyangsoo Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Syracuse UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.National Computerization AgencySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations