Camera Calibration with Two Arbitrary Coplanar Circles

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3023)


In this paper, we describe a novel camera calibration method to estimate the extrinsic parameters and the focal length of a camera by using only one single image of two coplanar circles with arbitrary radius.

We consider that a method of simple operation to estimate the extrinsic parameters and the focal length of a camera is very important because in many vision based applications, the position, the pose and the zooming factor of a camera is adjusted frequently.

An easy to use and convenient camera calibration method should have two characteristics: 1) the calibration object can be produced or prepared easily, and 2) the operation of a calibration job is simple and easy. Our new method satisfies this requirement, while most existing camera calibration methods do not because they need a specially designed calibration object, and require multi-view images. Because drawing beautiful circles with arbitrary radius is so easy that one can even draw it on the ground with only a rope and a stick, the calibration object used by our method can be prepared very easily. On the other hand, our method need only one image, and it allows that the centers of the circle and/or part of the circles to be occluded.

Another useful feature of our method is that it can estimate the focal length as well as the extrinsic parameters of a camera simultaneously. This is because zoom lenses are used so widely, and the zooming factor is adjusted as frequently as the camera setting, the estimation of the focal length is almost a must whenever the camera setting is changed. The extensive experiments over simulated images and real images demonstrate the robustness and the effectiveness of our method.


  1. 1.
    Faugeras, O.: Three-Dimensional Computer Vision: A Geometric Viewpoint. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meng, X., Hu, Z.: A New Easy Camera Calibration Technique Based on Circular Points. Pattern Recognition 36, 1155–1164 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, G., Wu, F., Hu, Z.: Novel Approach to Circular Points Based Camera CalibrationGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, J.S., Kim, H.W., Kweon, I.S.: A Camera Calibration Method using Concentric Circles for Vision Applications. In: ACCV, pp. 23–25 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, C., Sun, F., Hu, Z.: Planar Conic Based Camera Calibration. In: ICPR (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurdjos, P., Grouzil, A., Payrissat, R.: Another Way of Looking at Plane-Based Calibration: the Centere Circle Constraint. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2353, pp. 252–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Long, Q.: Conic Reconstruction and Correspondence From Two Views. PAMI 18(2), 151–160 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhome, M., Lapreste, J.T., Rives, G., Richetin, M.: Spatial Localization of Modelled Objects of Revolution in Monocular Perspective Vision. In: Faugeras, O. (ed.) ECCV 1990. LNCS, vol. 427, pp. 475–485. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Avidan, S., Shashua, A.: Trajectory Triangulation: 3D Reconstruction of Moving Points from a Monocular Image Sequence. PAMI 22(4), 348–357 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heikkila, J., Silven, O.: A Four-step Camera Calibration Procedure with Implicit Image CorrectionGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forsyth, D., et al.: Invariant descriptors for 3-D object recognition and pose. IEEE. Trans. PAMI 13, 971–991 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rothwell, C.A., et al.: Relative motion and pose from arbitrary plane curves. Image Vis. Comput. 10(4), 250–262 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Safaee-Red, R., et al.: Constraints on quadratic-curved features under perspective projection. Image Vis. Comput. 19(8), 532–548 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Safaee-Red, R., et al.: Three-dimensional location estimation of circular features for machine vision. IEEE Trans. Robot Autom. 8(5), 624–640 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanatani, K., Wu, L.: 3D Interpretation of Conics and Orthogonality. Image Understanding 58, 286–301 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu, L., Kanatani, K.: Interpretation of Conic Motion and Its Applications. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 10(1), 67–84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sturm, P.: A Case Against Kruppa’s Equations for Camera Self-Calibration. PAMI 22(10), 348–357 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sukthankar, R., Stockton, R., Mullin, M.: Smarter Presentations: Exploiting Homography in Camera-Projector Systems. In: ICCV, pp. 247–253 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holt, R.J., Netravali, A.N.: Camera Calibration Problem: Some New Result. CVIU 54(3), 368–383 (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, Z.: A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration. PAMI 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sturm, P., Maybank, S.: On Plane-Based Camera Calibration: A General Algorithm, Singularities, Applications. In: CVPR, pp. 432–437 (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wada, T.: Color-Target Detection Based on Nearest Neighbor Classifier: Example Based Classification and its Applications. JPJS SIG Notes, 2002-CVIM-134, pp. 17–24 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barreto, J.P., Araujo, H.: Issues on the Geometry of Central Catadioptric Image Formation. CVPR (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fitzgibbon, A., Pilu, M., Fisher, R.B.: Direct Least Square Fitting of Ellipses. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21(5), 476–480 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halir, R., Flusser, J.: Numerically Stable Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses. WSCG (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Systems EngineeringWakayama UniversityWakayama CityJapan

Personalised recommendations