Advertisement

Echelon Stock Formulation of Arborescent Distribution Systems: An Application to the Wagner-Whitin Problem

  • S. Armagan Tarim
  • Ian Miguel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3011)

Abstract

An arborescent distribution system is a multi-level system in which each installation receives input from a unique immediate predecessor and supplies one or more immediate successors. In this paper, it is shown that a distribution system with an arborescent structure can also be modelled using an echelon stock concept where at any instant the total echelon holding cost is accumulated at the same rate as the total conventional holding cost. The computational efficiency of the echelon model is tested on the well-known Wagner-Whitin type dynamic inventory lot-sizing problem, which is an intractable combinatorial problem from both mixed-integer programming (MIP) and constraint programming (CP) standpoints. The computational experiments show that the echelon MIP formulation is computationally very efficient compared to the conventional one, whereas the echelon CP formulation remains intractable. A CP/LP hybrid yields a substantial improvement over the pure CP approach, solving all tested instances in a reasonable time.

Keywords

Mixed Integer Programming Constraint Programming Echelon Formulation Mixed Integer Programming Solver Implied Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Afentakis, P., Gavish, B.: Bill of material processor algorithms -time and storage complexity analysis. Technical report, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Afentakis, P., Gavish, B., Karmarkar, U.: Computationally efficient optimal solutions to the lot-sizing problem in assembly systems. Management Science 30, 222–239 (1984)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Axsater, S., Rosling, K.: Notes: Installation vs. echelon stock policies for multilevel inventory control. Management Science 39, 1274–1279 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benichou, M., Gauthier, J.M., Hentges, G., Ribiere, G.: Experiments in mixed integer linear programming. Mathematical Programming 1, 76–94 (1971)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, F., Zheng, Y.S.: One-warehouse multiretailer systems with centralized stock information. Operations Research 45, 275–287 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, A.R., Armentano, V.A.: Echelon stock formulations for multi-stage lotsizing with lead-times. International Journal of Systems Science 24, 1759–1775 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark, A.R., Armentano, V.A.: A heuristic for a resource-capacitated multi-stage lot-sizing problem with lead times. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, 1208–1222 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark, A.J., Scarf, H.: Optimal policies for a multi-echelon inventory problem. Management Science 6, 475–490 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crowston, W.B., Wagner, M.H., Williams, J.F.: Economic lot size determination in multi-stage assembly systems. Management Science 19, 517–527 (1973)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Optimization, D.: Xpress-MP Essentials: An Introduction to Modeling and Optimization. Dash Associates, New Jersey (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Padberg, M.W., Rinaldi, G.: A branch-and-bound algorithms for the resolution of large-scale symmetric traveling salesman problems. SIAM Review 33(1), 60–100 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwarz, L.B.: Multi-Level Production/Inventory Control Systems: Theory and Practice. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwarz, L.B.: Physical distribution: The anaylsis of inventory and location. AIIE Transactions 13, 138–150 (1981)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwarz, L.B., Schrage, L.: On echelon holding costs. Management Science 24, 865–866 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silver, E.A., Pyke, D.F., Peterson, R.: Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. John-Wiley and Sons, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagner, H.M., Whitin, T.M.: Dynamic version of the economic lot size model. Management Science 5, 89–96 (1958)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zangwill, W.I.: A backlogging model and a multi-echelon model of a dynamic economic lot size production system – a network approach. Management Science 15(9), 506–527 (1969)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Armagan Tarim
    • 1
  • Ian Miguel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ManagementHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science YorkUniversity of YorkUK

Personalised recommendations