Skip to main content

On Perceptual Quality of Watermarked Images – An Experimental Approach

  • Conference paper
Digital Watermarking (IWDW 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2939))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One challenge in designing content authentication watermarks is how to achieve a good balance between robustness against incidental distortions, fragility to tampering attacks, and maintaining an acceptable visual quality. In this paper, we present a performance analysis of a wavelet-based semi-fragile watermarking algorithm in terms of its impact on the perceptual quality of watermarked images. We use three different quality metrics to measure the degradation of the test images’ visual quality. Based on our experimental results, we propose limits on the algorithm parameters in order to achieve an acceptable balance between good robustness and minimal perceptual quality impact. We also present a sliding-window technique that helps in choosing appropriate wavelet decomposition levels for embedding the watermark bits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kundur, D., Hatzinakos, D.: Digital Watermarking for Telltale Tamper Proofing and Authentication. Proceedings of the IEEE 87(7), 1167–1180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kutter, M., Petitcolas, F.A.P.: A fair benchmark for image watermarking systems. In: Proc. SPIE Security & Watermarking Multimedia Contents, San Jose, CA, USA, January 1999, vol. 3657, pp. 226–239 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avcıbaş, I., Sankur, B., Sayood, K.: Statistical Evaluation of Image Quality Measures. Journal of Electronic Imaging 11, 206–223 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Voloshynovskiy, S., Herrigel, A., Baumgärtner, N., Pun, T.: A stochastic approach to content adaptive digital image watermarking. In: Pfitzmann, A. (ed.) IH 1999. LNCS, vol. 1768, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, J., Miller, M.L., Bloom, J.A.: Digital Watermarking. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Watson, B.: DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images. In: Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, Proc. SPIE, vol. 1913–14 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Terhardt, E.: Calculating Virtual Pitch. Hearing Research 1, 155–182 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mannos, J.L., Sakrison, J.J.: The Effects of a Visual Fidelity Criterion on the Encoding of Images. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-4, 525–536 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Lu, L.: Why is Image Quality Assessment So Difficult? In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing (May 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, M., Liu, B.: Watermarking for image authentication. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (October 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strang, G., Nguyen, T.: Wavelets and Filter Banks. Wellesley-Cambridge Press (1997) (revised edition)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, Y.T.: Wavelet Basics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kundur, D., Hatzinakos, D.: Towards a telltale watermarking technique for tamper proofing. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. On Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 409–413 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fridrich, J.: Methods for Detecting Changes in Digital Images. In: IEEE Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Melbourne, Australia (November 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira, S., Voloshynovskiy, S., Madueño, M., Marchand-Maillet, S., Pun, T.: Second generation benchmarking and application oriented evaluation. In: Moskowitz, I.S. (ed.) IH 2001. LNCS, vol. 2137, p. 340. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdel-Aziz, B., Chouinard, JY. (2004). On Perceptual Quality of Watermarked Images – An Experimental Approach. In: Kalker, T., Cox, I., Ro, Y.M. (eds) Digital Watermarking. IWDW 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2939. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24624-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24624-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21061-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24624-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics