Abstract
The Jura conflict provides a useful example for studying the impact of modern direct democracy in a conflictual established-outsiders relationship. The first part of this article examines the functions and effects of direct democracy in general and in theory. When considering the effects of direct democracy on politics, the formation of state and society, the political habitus, and the public sphere, it is important to distinguish between the different types of procedures – initiative, referendum, plebiscite – and the different forms that they can take. Against false accusations of tyranny levelled at direct democracy, it must be stressed that well-designed direct democracy makes decision-making more democratic. This is not to deny the possibility and existence of abuse of democratic power; however, abuse should be attributed to the real causes. The second part of this article looks at the Jura conflict as an example of how direct democracy has worked in practice. In the course of the Jura conflict direct democracy turned out to be an indispensable tool of conflict regulation, and indeed conflict resolution, which is still ongoing. In describing the events emphasis is placed on the role played by direct democracy, its functions and effects in practice against the background set out in the first part of the article. The Jura conflict shows that there is a democratic alternative to (ethnic) nationalism. Whatever the ultimate solution will be, it has to pass the test of a democratic decision at the ballot box by all the citizens of the region. To begin with, however, it is necessary to clarify the concept of direct democracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bassand, Michel (1975): The Jura Problem. In: Journal of Peace Research, 12(2), pp. 139–150.
Bobbio, Norberto (1987):.The Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Buechi, Rolf (2007): Reflections on the Social Production of Incompetent Citizens. In: Pállinger, Zoltán Tibor et al. (eds.): Direct Democracy in Europe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp.71–82.
Buechi, Rolf (2011): Local Popular Votes in Finland. Procedures and Experiences. In: Schiller, Theo (ed.): Direct Democracy in Local Politics in Europe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 202–225.
Chatelain, Emma (2007): « Nous sommes des hommes libres sur une terre libre . Le mouvement antiséparatiste jurassien (1947–1975), son idéologie et ses relations avec Berne. Neuchâtel: Éditions Alphil.
Hauser, Claude (1997): Aux origines intellectuelles de la Question jurassienne. Culture et politique entre la France et la Suisse romande (1910–1950). Courrendlin.
Hauser, Claude (2004): L’aventure du Jura. Cultures politiques et identité régionale au XXe siècle. Lausanne.
Hauser, Claude (2005): Award speech: “Regards sur l’histoire jurassienne au XXe siècle: des identités en marche”. [http://www.aij.ch/CMS/default.asp?ID = 159].
Junker, Beat (1996): Geschichte des Kantons Bern seit 1798, Band III. Historischer Verein des Kantons Bern (ed.). [http://www.hvbe.ch/gkb/index.html].
Kaufman, Bruno, Buechi, Rolf & Braun, Nadja (2010): Guidebook to Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Beyond. Köniz: Ast & Jakob, Vetsch AG.
Keane, John (2009): The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.
Luciani, Massimo (1998): Referendum und parlamentarische Regierungsform. In: Die Union 4/98, Vierteljahreszeitschrift für Integrationsfragen, pp.197–208.
Mann, Michael (1993): The Sources of Social Power. Volume II, The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mouffe, Chantal (2010): From antagonistic politics to an agonistic public space. [http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p = ].
Philippe, Vincent (2008): Roland Béguelin, la plume-epée. Vevey: Editions de l’Aire.
Rauschenbach, Rolf (2010): Mit direktdemokratischen Verfahren zu postkonventionellen politischen Kulturen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Ruch, Christian (2001): Struktur und Strukturwandel des jurassischen Separatismus zwischen 1974 und 1994. Bern: Haupt.
Vatter, Adrian (2002): Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Vatter, Adrian (2009): Lijphart expanded: three dimensions of democracy in advanced OECD countries? In: European Political Science Review 1(1), (March 2009), pp. 125–154.
Widmer report: Rapport de la commission consultative du Conseil fédéral et des cantons de Berne et du Jura.31 mars 1993. [http://www.groupebelier.ch/] (Rapport Widmer).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buechi, R. (2012). Use of Direct Democracy in the Jura Conflict. In: Marxer, W. (eds) Direct Democracy and Minorities. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94304-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94304-6_13
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18581-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-94304-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)