Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis pp 19–39Cite as

Öffentliche Soziologien: Widersprüche, Dilemmata und Möglichkeiten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Das zunehmende Interesse an öffentlichen Soziologien kennzeichnet eine wachsende Lücke zwischen dem Ethos der Soziologen und sozialen, politischen und wirtschaftlichen Tendenzen in der Gesellschaft allgemein. Die öffentliche Soziologie zielt darauf ab, die öffentliche Debatte über moralische und politische Fragen durch das Einbringen soziologischer Theorie und Forschung zu bereichern. Sie ist von der policy- oder anwendungsorientierten, der professionellen und der kritischen Soziologie zu unterscheiden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler und Steven Tipton. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Dt.: Gewohnheiten des Herzens: Individualismus und Gemeinsinn in der amerikanischen Gesellschaft, übers. von Ingrid Peikert, Bund Verlag, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Stephen, (Hrsg.). 2001. What’s Wrong with Sociology? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ders., 1975. Trends in School Segregation, 1968-1973. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. ORT: Free Press. (Dt. Über soziale Arbeitsteilung, Suhrkamp)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. Basic Books. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 Bde. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Suhrkamp, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Lee.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Alfred McClung. 1976. „Sociology for Whom?“ American Sociological Review 44:925-936

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, Robert. 1939. Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Sciences in American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 2003. Incoherent Empire. New York: Verso Books. (Dt. Die ohnmächtige Supermacht, übers. von Thomas Atzert, Campus Verlag, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, Ruth. 1986. „Women’s History and the Sears Case”. Feminist Studies 12:375-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. (Dt. Kritik der soziologischen Denkweise, Luchterhand 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1965. The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. United States Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, John. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, Lawrence. 1981. A History of the American Sociological Association, 1905-1980. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, David. 1950. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. Yale University Press. (Dt. Die einsame Masse. Eine Untersuchung der Wandlungen des amerikanischen Charakters, übers. von Renate Rausch, Rowohlt, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, Pitirim. 1956. Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith. 2004. „Marital Suitors Court Social Science Spin-Sters: The Unwittingly Conservative Effects of Public Sociology“. Social Problems 51:131-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith und Timothy Biblarz. 2001. “(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?” American Sociological Review 66:159-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen und Jonathan Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, Diane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dies., 2004. “Public Sociologist by Accident.” Social Problems 51:115-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Alan. 1998. One Nation, After All. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berkeley, USA

    Michael Burawoy

Authors
  1. Michael Burawoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Burawoy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 52, Bünde, 32257, Germany

    Kai Unzicker

  2. Am Sudholz 49, Bielefeld, 33613, Germany

    Gudrun Hessler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burawoy, M. (2012). Öffentliche Soziologien: Widersprüche, Dilemmata und Möglichkeiten. In: Unzicker, K., Hessler, G. (eds) Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18187-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-94221-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation