Why Should We Account for Intersectionality in Quantitative Analysis of Survey Data?
While in the social sciences most of the empirically-based research on intersectionality employs qualitative techniques such as in-depth interviewing and archival work, there is a small, but steadily growing, literature that employs quantitative statistical techniques on national and cross-national survey data.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blumberg, Rae Lesser. 2007. Gender Bias in Textbooks: A Hidden Obstacle on the Road to Gender Equality in Education. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2008 Education for All by 2015: will we make it? http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001555/155509e.pdf Accessed July 4, 2010.
- Bowleg, Lisa. 2008. When Black + Lesbian + Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research. In: Sex Roles 59: 312– 325.Google Scholar
- Dubrow, Joshua Kjerulf. 2008. How Can We Account for Intersectionality in Quantitative Analysis of Survey Data? Empirical Illustration of Central and Eastern Europe. In: ASK: Society, Research, Methods 17: 85–102.Google Scholar
- Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 1999. Social Dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Walby, Sylvia. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Weber, Max. 1946. Class, Status, Party. In: Gerth, Hans, and Mills, Wright C. (eds). From Max Weber, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 180–195Google Scholar