Skip to main content
Book cover

Genomforschung – Politik – Gesellschaft pp 33–67Cite as

Experimente partizipativer ELSA-Forschung

Eine methodenpolitische Reflexion

  • Chapter

Schlagworte

  • Partizipation
  • Methodenpolitik
  • Methodenreflexion
  • ELSAForschung

Keywords

  • Politics of Method
  • Participation
  • ELSA-Research

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92647-6_3
  • Chapter length: 35 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-531-92647-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • BMWV (Bundesministerium fürWissenschaft und Verkehr). 1999. Grünbuch zur österreichischen Forschungspolitik. Wien: Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, Alexander. 2004. Partizipative Politikberatung am Beispiel der BürgerInnenkonferenz 2003 (Analyse). Endbericht im Auftrag des Rats für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung und des Wiener Wissenschafts- und Technologiefonds. Wien: Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung, ÖAW

    Google Scholar 

  • Abels, Gabrielle und Bora, Alfons. 2004. Demokratische Technikbewertung. Bielefeld: transcript

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John and Tucker, Aviezer. 2008. Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conferences in Denmark, France, and the United States. Public Administration Review 68(5): 864–876

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike and Fochler, Maximilian. 2008. The Bottom-up Meanings of the Concept of Public Participation in Science and Technology. Science and Public Policy 35(7): 489–499

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike und Fochler, Maximilian. 2010a. Riskante Verwicklungen des Epistemischen, Strukturellen und Biographischen: Governance-Strukturen und deren mikropolitische Implikationen für das akademische Leben. In: Steuerung von Wissenschaft? Governance des österreichischen Innovationssystems, hrsg. P. Biegelbauer, 297–328. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike and Fochler, Maximilian. 2010b. Slim futures and the fat pill. Civic imaginations of innovation and governance in an engagement setting. Accepted with revisions at Science as Culture. Preprint available at www.sciencestudies.univie.ac.at/publikationen/

  • Felt, Ulrike and Fochler, Maximilian. 2010c. Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and Describing Publics in Public Engagement, Manuscript under review. Preprint available at www.sciencestudies.univie.ac.at/publikationen/

  • Felt, Ulrike, Fochler, Maximilian und Strassnig, Michael. 2003. Evaluierung des „Diskurstag Gendiagnostik“. Analyse der dialogischen Wechselwirkung zwischen Wissenschaft und verschiedenen Öffentlichkeiten. Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung,Wissenschaft und Kultur. Wien: Institut fürWissenschaftstheorie undWissenschaftsforschung, Arbeitsgruppe Wissenschaftsforschung, Universität Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike, Fochler, Maximilian and Winkler, Peter. 2009 [Felt et al 2009a]. Coming to Terms with Biomedical Technologies in Different Technopolitical Cultures. A Comparative Analysis of Focus Groups on Organ Transplantation and Genetic Testing in Austria, France, and the Netherlands. Science, Technology, & Human Values, OnlineFirst, October 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike, Fochler, Maximilian, Mager, Astrid andWinkler, Peter. 2008. Visions and Versions of Governing Biomedicine: Narratives on Power Structures, Decision-making and Public Participation in the Field of Biomedical Technology in the Austrian Context. Social Studies of Science 38(2): 233–255

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike, Fochler, Maximilian, Müller, Annina and Strassnig, Michael. 2009 [Felt et al. 2009b]. Unruly Ethics: On the Difficulties of a Bottom-up Approach to Ethics in the Field of Genomics. Public Understanding of Science 18(3): 354–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike, and Wynne, Brian. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Fochler, Maximilian und Müller, Annina. 2006. Vom Defizit zum Dialog? Zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit in der europäischen und österreichischen Forschungspolitik. ITA manu:script, ITA-06-04. Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung, ÖAW

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmeiner, Robert und Körtner, Ulrich H. J. 2002. Die Bioethikkommission beim Bundeskanzleramt – Aufgaben, Arbeitsweise, Bedeutung. Recht der Medizin 6 (November): 164–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert and Dryzek, John. 2006. Deliberative Impact: The Macro-political Uptake of Mini-Publics. Politics and Society 34(2): 219–244

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, Gabrielle. 2001. Technology, Politics, and National Identity in France. In: Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parker Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes, hrsg. M. T. Allen and G. Hecht, 253–293. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, Maja and Irwin, Alan. 2010. Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge. On Consensus, Consensusing and False Consensusness. Social Studies of Science 40(1): 105–126

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Alan. 2001. Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 1–18

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Alan. 2006. The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the „New“ Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. The Idiom of Co-production. In: States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, hrsg. S. Jasanoff, 1–12. London/New York: Routledge

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. „Let Them Eat Cake“: GM Foods and the Democratic Imagination. In: Science and Citizens. Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, hrsg. M. Leach, I. Scoones and B. Wynne, 183–198. London/New York: Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John. 2004. After Method. Mess in Social Science Research. New York/London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John and Urry, John. 2004. Enacting the Social. Economy and Society 33(3): 290–310

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, Javier and Soneryd, Linda. 2007. Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics. Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 279–297

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Mike. 2009. Publics Performing Publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and Politics. Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 617–631

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham/London: Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung (RFTE). 2009. Strategie 2020. Wien: Rat für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, Arie. 2009. Futures of ELSA. EMBO Reports 10: 666–670

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian. 1995. Public Understanding of Science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, hrsg. S. Jasanoff et al., 457–479. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian. 2008. Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political-Conceptual Category Mistake. East Asian Science, Technology, and Society: an International Journal 1(1): 1–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Wissenschaftsforschung, Universität Wien, Sensengasse 8/10, A-1090, Wien

    Ulrike Felt, Maximilian Fochler & Michael Strassnig

Authors
  1. Ulrike Felt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maximilian Fochler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Strassnig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Höhere Studien, Stumpergasse 56, A-1060, Wien

    Erich Grießler

  2. IFZ – Interuniversitäres Forschungszentrum für Technik, Arbeit und Kultur, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Standort Graz, Schlögelgasse 2, A- 8010, Graz

    Harald Rohracher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Felt, U., Fochler, M., Strassnig, M. (2011). Experimente partizipativer ELSA-Forschung. In: Grießler, E., Rohracher, H. (eds) Genomforschung – Politik – Gesellschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92647-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92647-6_3

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17362-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92647-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)