Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Netzwerkforschung pp 99–111Cite as

Starke und Schwache Beziehungen

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag befasst sich mit einer Eigenschaft von sozialen Netzwerken: der Stärke von Beziehungen. Er untersucht die Definitionen von Stärkegraden und diskutiert die Auswirkungen der Bestimmung von Beziehungsstärken auf die Interpretation von Netzwerkstrukturen und der Funktion einzelner Elemente innerhalb eines Netzwerkes. Die Soziale Netzwerkanalyse verwendet mit Hinsicht auf die Tragfähigkeit oder Qualität von Beziehungen die Begriffe „starke Beziehungen“, „schwache Beziehungen“ und „abwesende Beziehungen“ (bzw. „nicht vorhandene Beziehungen“).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5 Literatur

  • Avenarius, Christine B., 2002: Work and Social Network Composition among Immigrants from Taiwan to Southern California. Anthropology of Work Review 23: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Yanjie, 1997: Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Indirect Connection, Bridges, and Job Search in China. American Sociological Review 62: 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Yanjie und Soon Ang, 1997: Guanxi Networks and Job Mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces 75: 981–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Stephen P., Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass und Guiseppe Labianca, 2009: Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science 323: 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Stephen P. und Martin G.. Everett, 1997: Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks 19: 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, Philip, 1995: In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barro. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S., 1992: Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Daniel, Kevin Esterling und David Lazer, 2003: The strength of strong ties. A Model of contact-making in policy networks with evidence from US health politics. Rationality and Society 15: 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Dorwin und Frank Harary, 1956: Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider's Theory. Psychological Review 63: 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Rob, Stephen P. Borgatti und Andrew Parker, 2001: Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks 23: 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Rob und Jonathon N. Cummings, 2004: Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal 47: 928–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csermely, Peter, 2006: Weak Links: Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Jonathan N. und Sara Kiesler, 2007: Who works with whom? Collaborative tie strength in distributed interdisciplinary projects. Proceedings of the 3rd International e-Social Science Conference, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 7.-9. Oktober.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James A., 1963: Structural Balance, Mechanical Solidarity, and Interpersonal Relations. American Journal of Sociology 68: 444–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Graaf, Nan Dirk, und Hendrik Derk Flap, 1988: With a little help from my friends. Social Forces 67: 452–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Bonnie H., 1996: Culture, Class, and Connections. American Journal of Sociolgy 102: 217–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, Vincente, 1999: Social Networks Among the Urban Poor: Inequality and Integration in a Latin American City. S. 147–184 in: Barry Wellman (Hg.), Networks in the Global Village. Life in Contemporary Communities. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L., 1997: Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social Networks 19: 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott L., 1981: The Focused Organization of Social Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Linton C., 2004: The Development of Social Network Analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Linton C., 1992: The Sociological Concept of “Group”: An Empirical Test of Two Models. American Journal of Sociology 98: 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, Noah, 1980: A Test of the Structural Features of Granovetter's Strength of Weak Ties Theory. Social Networks 2: 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, Martin und Mario Benassi, 2000: Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital. Organization Science 11: 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, Martin und Mario Benassi, 1999: The dark side of social capital. S. 298–322 in: Roger T. Leenders und Shaul M. Gabbay (Hg.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston, Mass.: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, Max, 1955 (1967): The judicial process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark S., 1973: The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark S., 1983: The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory 1: 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Morton T., 1999: The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, Fritz, 1946: Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 21: 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, Fritz, 1958: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, Marina, 2008: Mit welchem Ziel werden bestehende Netzwerke generiert? S. 295–308 in: Christian Stegbauer (Hg.), Netzwerkanalyse und Netzwerktheorie. Ein neues Paradigma in den Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, Bruce, 1973: Social network and conjugal role in urban Zambia: Towards a reformulation of the Bott hypothesis. S. 83–110 in: Jeremy Boissevain und J. Clyde Mitchell (Hg.), Network Analysis Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague, Paris: Mouton Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, Bruce, 1969: Norms and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. S. 181–245 in: J. Clyde Mitchell (Hg.), Social netowrks in urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killworth, Peter und H. Russel Bernard, 1974: Catij: A new sociometric and its application to a prison living unit. Human Organization 33: 335 350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, David, 1992: The Strength of Strong Ties: the Importance of Philos in Organizations. S. 216–239 in: Nitin Nohria und Robert G. Eccles (Hg.), Networks and Organziations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan, 2001: Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan, Walter Ensel, und John Vaughn, 1981: Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review 46: 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V. und Jeanne S. Hurlbert, 1988: Social Resources and Mobility Outcomes: A Replication and Extension. Social Forces 66: 1038–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V. und Karen E. Campbell, 1984: Measuring tie strength. Social Forces 63: 482–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, Michael K., Michael C. White, Rebecca G. Long, Barlow Soper und C.W. von Bergen, 1998: Association of indicators and predictors of tie strength. Psychological Reports 83: 1459–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, Michael J., 1983: New Directions in Multiplexity Analysis. S. 223–244 in: Ronald S. Burt und Michael J. Minor (Hg.), Applied Network Analysis. A Methodological Introduction. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, James D., 1992: Job Search and Network Composition: Implications of the Strength- Of-Weak-Ties Hypothesis. American Sociological Review 57: 586–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Reed E., 1989: The Strength of Strong Ties: Social Networks and Intergroup Conflict in Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal 32: 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onnela, Jukka-Pekka J., Jari Saramäki, Jörkki Hyvönen, Gabor Szabó, David Lazer, Kimmo Kaski, Janos Kertesz und Albert L. Barabasi, 2007: Structure and tie strength in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 18: 7332–7336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petroczi, Andrea, Tamas Nepusz und Fülöp Bazso, 2007: Measuring tie-strength in virtual social networks. Connections 27: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro und Julia Sensenbrenner, 1993: Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1320–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol, 1954: Spread of Information through a Population with Socio-structural Bias. III. Suggested Experimental Procedures. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 16: 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol, 1963: Mathematical Models of Social Interaction. S. 493–579 in: R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush und Eugene Galanter (Hg.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Bd. 2. New York, London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Naomi, Meryl Fingrutd, Michelle Ethier, Roberta Karant und David McDonald, 1985: Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Women's Reform in New York State. American Journal of Sociology 90: 1022–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, Thomas, 1996: Muster sozialer Ordnung. Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, Scott E., Maria L. Kraimer und Robert C. Liden, 2001: A Social Capital Theory of Career Success. The Academy of Management Journal 44: 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Xiaolin, Lada A. Adamic und Martin J. Strauss, 2007: Networks of Strong Ties. Physica A 378: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegbauer, Christian, 2008: Weak und Strong Ties. Freundschaft aus netzwerktheoretischer Perspektive. S. 105–119 in: Christian Stegbauer (Hg.), Netzwerkanalyse und Netzwerktheorie. Ein neues Paradigma in den Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, Thomas W. und David Vlahov, 2001: Selective risk taking among needle exchange participants: implications for supplemental interventions. American Journal of Public Health 91: 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, Lois M., 1979: Multiplexity in Adult Friendships. Social Forces 57: 1286–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley und Katherine Faust, 1994: Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Duncan J., 2004: The new science of networks. American Review of Sociology 30: 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, Bernd, 1991: Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment. American Sociological Review 56: 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Barry, Peter J. Carrington und Alan Hall, 1988: Networks as Personal Communities. S. 130–184 in: Barry Wellman und Stephen D. Berkowitz (Hg.), Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge und New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Barry und Scott Wortley, 1990: Different Strokes for Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology 96 (3): 558–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Douglas R. und Michael Houseman, 2003: The navigability of strong ties: Small Worlds, Ties Strength, and Network Typology. Self-organization in Strong-tie Small Worlds. Complexity 8 (1): 72 – 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christine B. Avenarius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Christian Stegbauer Roger Häußling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avenarius, C.B. (2010). Starke und Schwache Beziehungen. In: Stegbauer, C., Häußling, R. (eds) Handbuch Netzwerkforschung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92575-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92575-2_9

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15808-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92575-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation