Skip to main content

Agentenbasierte Modelle in der Soziologie

Über die Integration von Empirie und Modellierung

  • Chapter
Die Analytische Soziologie in der Diskussion

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag zielt darauf ab zu illustrieren, wie agentenbasiertes Modellieren für die Integration von Theorie und Empirie bei mechanismenbasierten Erklärungen hilfreich sein kann. Unser Ausgangspunkt ist, dass die Erforschung der MikroGrundlagen sozialer Resultate der wichtigste Stützpfeiler bei Untersuchungen in der Analytischen Soziologie ist. Wenn Makro-Resultate auf Handlungen, Motivationen und Interaktionen von Individuen zurückgeführt werden, kann die Soziologie weit informativere Erklärungen liefern als nur durch aggregierte Perspektiven (vgl. z.B. Bruch/Mare 2006: 667f).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Boero, Riccardo/Flaminio Squazzoni (2005): Does Empirical Embeddedness Matter? Methodological Issues on Agent–Based Models for Analytical Social Science. In: journal of Artificial Socities and Social Simulation, H. 4: www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.Uk/8/4/6.html.

  • Bowles, Samuel (2004): Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, Elizabeth/Robert D. Mare (2006): Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change. In: American Journal of Sociology, H. 3:667–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, Elizabeth/Robert D. Mare (2009): Preferences and Pathways to Segregation: Reply to Van De Rijt, Siegel, and Macy. In: American Journal of Sociology, H. 4:1181–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario (1997): Mechanism and Explanation. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, H. 4:410–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario (2004): How Does it Work? The Search for Explanatory Mechanisms. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, H. 2:182–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, Kathleen M. (2002): Simulating Society: The Tension between Transparency and Veridicality. In: Macal, Charles/David A. Sallach (Hrsg.): Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution. Agent 2002 Conference. Chicago: University of Chicago, Argonne National Laboratory, 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, John L. (1994): Complexification. Explaining a Paradoxical World Through the Science of Surprise. Hillsdale, New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, Philip/Paul Davies (Hrsg.) (2006): The Re–Emergence of Emergence. The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford, New York: Oxford Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. (1990): Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge Massachusetts: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Marchi, Scott, (2005): Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ.–Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert (1969): The Court Society. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Joshua M. (2006) Generative Social Science. Studies in Agent–Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, New York: Princeton Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Joshua M./Robert L. Axtell (1996) Growing Artifidal Societies. Social Science from the Bottom–Up. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagiolo, Giorgio/Alessio Moneta/Paul Windrum (2007): A Critical Guide for Empirical Validation of Agent–Based Models in Economics: Methodologies, Procedures, and Open Problems. In: Computational Economics, H. 3:195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst/Herbert Gintis (2007): Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations. In: Annual Review of Sociology, Jg. 33:43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Ulrich/Flaminio Squazzoni/Klaus G. Troitzsch (2009): Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation. In: Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.Uk/8/4/7.html.

  • Geller, Armando/Scott Moss (2008): rowing Qawm: An Evidence–Driven Declarative Model of Afghan Power Structures. In: Advances in Complex Systems, H. 2:321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexandra L./Andrew Bennett (2004): Case–Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sdence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Nigel (2002): Varieties of Emergence. In: Macal, Charles/David A. Sallach (Hrsg.): Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution. Agent 2002 Conference. Chicago: University of Chicago, Argonne National Laboratory, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Nigel (2008): Agent–Based Models. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert et al. (Hrsg.) (2005): Moral Sentiments and Material Interests. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgianni, Francesco et al. (1997): Mapping the Mechanism–Based Modification Sites in L–Aspartase from Escherichia coli. In: Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, H. 2:329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffmann, Erving (1961): Asylums. Garden City: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H. (2000) On Sociology. Numbers, Narratives and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark/Roland Soong (1988): Threshold Models of Collective Behavior: Chinese Restaurants, Residential Segregation, and the Spiral of Silence. In: SocilogicalMethodology, 18:69–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, Peter (2005) Dissecting the Social. On the Prindples of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford Univ.–Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, Peter (2007): Actions and Networks. Sociology that Really Matters… To Me. In: Sociologica, H. 1: Doi: 10.2383/24187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, Peter/Richard Swedberg (Hrsg.) (1998): Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, Joseph et al. (2005): „Economic Man” in Cross–Cultural Perspective: Behavioural Experiments in 15 Small Scale Societies. In: Behavioural and Brain Sciences, H. 6:795–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, Bruce/Cesareo Hernändez/Klaus G. Troitzsch (Hrsg.) (2008): Social Simulation. Technologies, Advances, and New Discoveries. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon (1998): A Plea for Mechanisms. In: Hedström, Peter/Richard Swedberg (Hrsg.): Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.–Press, 45–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laurie, Alexander J./Narendra K. Jaggi (2003): Role of Vision in Neighborhood Racial Segregation: A Variant of the Schelling Segregation Model. In: Urban Studies, H. 13:2687–2704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Daniel (1998): Microfoundations, Methods, and Causation: On the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, Peter/Iindley Darden/Carl F. Craver (2000): Thinking about Mechanisms. In: Philosophy of Science, H. 1:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, Michael W. (2002): Social Simulation. In: Smelser, Neil J./Paul B. Baltes P. (Hrsg.j International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James (2001): Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method. In: SociologicalForum, H. 3:575–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, Peter T. (2006): A Realist Philosophy of Social Säence. Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.–Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, Gianluca (2005): Variables, mecanismes et simulations: une Synthese des trios methodes est–elle possible ? Une analyse critique de la litterature. In: Revue franfaise de sociologie, H. 1:37–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, Gianluca (2007): Progres et ‘urgence* de la modelisation en sociologie. Du concept de modele generateur et de sa mise en oeuvre. In: UAnne'e sociologie, H. 1:13–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate (2004): Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro–Phenomena. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, H. 2:237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. (1968): Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, John H./Scott E. Page (2007): Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Richard W. (1988): Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Scott/Bruce Edmonds (2005): Sociology and Simulation: Statistical and Qualitative Cross–Valida–tion. In: American journal of Sociology, H. 4:1095–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panes, Romans/Nicolaas J. Vriend (2007): Schelling's Spatial Proximity Model of Segregation Revisited. In: Journal of Public Economics, H. 1–2:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffel, David M. et al. (1995): Mechanism–Based Strategies for Mapping Heart Sympathetic Nerve Function. In: Nuclear Mediane and Biology, H. 8:1019–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Julian (2007): Do We Need Mechanisms in the Social Science? In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, H. 2:163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley C. (1984): Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton Univ.–Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Andrew (1992): Methodin SocialScience: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. Keith (2004): The Mechanisms of Emergence. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, H. 2:260–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas (1971): Dynamic Models of Segregation. In: Journal of Mathematical Sociology, H. 2:143–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas (1972): A Process of Residential Segregation: Neighborhood Tipping. In: Anthony, Pascal (Hrsg.): Racial Discrimination in Economic life. Lexington, D.C. Heath: Lexington, 57–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas (1978): Micromotives andMacrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1983): The Theory of Economic Development An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, Flaminio (2008a): The Micro–Macro link in Social Simulation. In: Sociologica, H. 1: Doi: 10.2383/26578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, Flaminio (2008b): A (Computational) Social Science Perspective on Societal Transitions. In: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, H. 4:266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, Flaminio (Hrsg.) (2009): Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1991): The Condition of Fruitfulness of Theorizing about Mechanisms in Social Science. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, H. 3:367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, Jos/Hans de Haan/Flaminio Squazzoni (2008b): Computational and Mathematical Approaches to Societal Transitions. In: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, H. 4:391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Rijt, Arnout/David Siegel/Michael Macy (2009): Neighborhood Chance and Neighborhood Change: A Comment on Bruch and Mare. In: American Journal of Sociology, H. 4:1166–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilier, David/Murray Webster (1970): Theoretical Concepts and Observables. In: American Socilogical Review, H. 4:748–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Lu/Nigel Gilbert (2008): Getting Away from Numbers. Using Qualitative Observation for Agent–Based Modeling. In: Advances in Complex Systems, H. 2:175–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Kron Thomas Grund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften |l Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boero, R., Squazzoni, F. (2010). Agentenbasierte Modelle in der Soziologie. In: Kron, T., Grund, T. (eds) Die Analytische Soziologie in der Diskussion. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92510-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92510-3_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16914-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92510-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics