Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die Komplexität der Kriege pp 127–143Cite as

Gefährliche Davids: Wie schwache Staaten ihre Nachbarn bedrohen

  • Chapter

  • 2597 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dass fragile und zerfallene Staaten eine Sicherheitsbedrohung darstellen, ist inzwischen weitgehend Konsens in Wissenschaft und Politik (Lambach/Debiel i.E.; Lambach 2006). Die Frage, für wessen Sicherheit sie welche Bedrohung darstellen, ist jedoch bisher nur in Teilen beantwortet worden. In der einschlägigen Literatur stehen implizit oder explizit zumeist die Sicherheitsinteressen westlicher Länder bzw. der „internationalen Gemeinschaft“ im Vordergrund. Viel wurde daher über die mögliche Verbindung von fragiler Staatlichkeit und transnationalem Terrorismus geschrieben, ohne dass dabei bislang ein eindeutiges Ergebnis zustande gekommen wäre (Piazza 2007; Simons/Tucker 2007). Weiterhin wurde ausgiebig darüber diskutiert, wie die internationale Politik mit fragilen Staaten umgehen sollte (z.B. Caplan 2007, Krasner/Pascual 2005).

Dieser Beitrag erscheint ebenso in der Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik (2009), 2, 193–211.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Anter, Andreas (19962) [1995]: Max Webers Theorie des modernen Staates. Herkunft, Struktur und Bedeutung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arreguín-Toft, Ivan (2005): How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoob, Mohammed (1998): „Subaltern Realism: International Relations Meets the Third World“, in: Stephanie G. Neuman (Hg.): International Relations Theory and the Third World, Houndmills et al.: Macmillan, 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoob, Mohammed (1995): The Third World Security Predicament. State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System, Boulder, CO: Lynne-Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, Edward A./Moon, Chungin (1988): „Legitimacy, Integration and Policy Capacity. The ‚Software‘ Side of Third World National Security“, in: Edward A. Azar/Chungin Moon (Hg.): National Security in the Third World. The Management of Internal and External Threats, Aldershot: Elgar, 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, Pinar/Morton, Adam D. (2002): „Historicising Representations of ‚Failed States‘: Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences?“, Third World Quarterly, 23 (1), 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, Alex (2006): „Location, Location, Location…: Identifying Hot Spots of International Conflict“, International Interactions, 31 (2), 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Michael E. (1996): „Introduction“, in: Michael E. Brown (Hg.): The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict, Cambridge et al.: MIT Press, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry (1997): „Rethinking Security after the Cold War“, Cooperation and Conflict, 32 (1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry/Wæver, Ole/Wilde, Jaap d. (1998): Security. A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder: Lynne-Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghy, Thomas (1987): „The State as Lame Leviathan. The Patrimonial Administrative State in Africa“, in: Zaki Ergas (Hg.): The African State in Transition, Houndmills: Macmillan, 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Richard (2007): „From Collapsing States to Neo-Trusteeship: The Limits to Solving the Problem of ‚Precarious Statehood‘ in the 21st Century“, Third World Quarterly, 28 (2), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, Sabine (2003): Guerilla Warfare in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1970–1995, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Edinburgh, 28.03.-02.04.2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, Christopher (Hg.) (1982): Private Patronage and Public Power. Political Clientelism in the Modern State, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, Kevin P./Boege, Volker/Brown, Anne/Foley, Wendy/Nolan, Anna (2007): „State Building Reconsidered. The Role of Hybridity in the Formation of Political Order“, Political Science, 59 (1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliffe, Lionel (1999): „Regional Dimensions of Conflict in the Horn of Africa“, Third World Quarterly, 20 (1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul/Elliott, Lani/Hegre, Håvard/Hoeffler, Anke/Reynal-Querol, Marta/Sambanis, Nicholas (2003): Breaking the Conflict Trap. Civil War and Development Policy, Washington, DC: World Bank Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, Christopher (1999): Kleine Kriege – große Wirkung. Wie unkonventionelle Kriegsführung die internationale Politik verändert, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, Christopher (1993): „Regionalisierung der Sicherheitspolitik. Eine Einführung“, in: Christopher Daase/Susanne Feske/Bernhard Moltmann/Claudia Schmid (Hg.): Regionalisierung der Sicherheitspolitik. Tendenzen in den internationalen Beziehungen nach dem Ost-West- Konflikt, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, David R./Moore, Will H. (1997): „Ethnicity Matters: Transnational Ethnic Alliances and Foreign Policy Behavior“, International Studies Quarterly, 41 (1), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debiel, Tobias/Klingenbiel, Stephan/Mehler, Andreas/Schneckener, Ulrich (2005): „Zwischen Ignorieren und Intervenieren. Strategien und Dilemmata externer Akteure in fragilen Staaten“, SEF Policy Paper, 23, Bonn: Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Stephen (1999): The Mask of Anarchy. The Destruction of Liberia and the Religious Dimension of an African Civil War, London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazal, Tanisha M. (2004): „State Death in the International System“, International Organization, 58 (2), 311–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D./Laitin, David D. (2003): „Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War“, American Political Science Review, 97 (1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fund for Peace (2008): „The Failed States Index 2008“, Foreign Policy, 197, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, Kristian S./Salehyan, Idean/Schultz, Kenneth (2008): „Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad. How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes“, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52 (4), 479–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, Kristian S. (2007): „Transnational Dimensions of Civil War“, Journal of Peace Research, 44 (3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack A. (2000): State Failure Task Force Report. Phase III Findings, McLean, VA: Science Applications International Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted R. (2000): People Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century, Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Lene (2006): Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentz, James J. (2004): „State Collapse and Regional Contagion in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons for Zimbabwe“, Scientia Militaria, 32 (1), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, Jeffrey (2004): „African Militaries and Rebellion. The Political Economy of Threat and Combat Effectiveness“, Journal of Peace Research, 41 (3), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, Jeffrey (2000): States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, John (1950): „Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma“, World Politics, 2 (2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Jonathan (2005): „Beyond the Other? A Postcolonial Critique of the Failed State Thesis“, African Identities, 3 (2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Stuart/Rothchild, Donald (1993): „The Impact of Regime on the Diffusion of Political Conflict“, in: Manus I. Midlarsky (Hg.): The Internationalization of Communal Strife, London et al.: Routledge, 189–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Stuart/Rothchild, Donald (1987): „The Contagion of Political Conflict in Africa and the World“, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30 (4), 716–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Tim (2002): „Disintegrating Indonesia? Implications for Regional Security“, Adelphi Paper, 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard (2002): „Violent Internal Conflict and the African State: Towards a Framework for Analysis“, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 29 (1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard (2001): „The State and Internal Conflict“, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 55 (1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Robert H. (1990): Quasi-States. Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Job, Brian L. (1992): „The Insecurity Dilemma: National, Regime, and State Securities in the Third World“, in: Brian L. Job (Hg.): The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States, Boulder, CO et al.: Lynne-Rienner, 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasfir, Nelson (2004): „Domestic Anarchy, Security Dilemmas, and Violent Predation“, in: Robert I. Rotberg (Hg.): When States Fail. Causes and Consequences, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosla, Deepa (1999): „Third World States as Intervenors in Ethnic Conflicts: Implications for Regional and International Security“, Third World Quarterly, 20 (6), 1143–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D./Pascual, Carlos (2005): „Addressing State Failure“, Foreign Affairs, 84 (4), 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, David/Rothchild, Donald (Hg.) (1998): The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, diffusion, and escalation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambach, Daniel/Debiel, Tobias (i.E.): „State Failure and State Building“, in: Myriam Dunn/Victor Mauer (Hg.): The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, Oxford: Routledge, i.E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambach, Daniel (2008): Staatszerfall und regionale Sicherheit, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambach Daniel (2006): „Security, Development and the Australian Security Discourse“, Australian Journal of Political Science, 41 (3), 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. (2004): „What Do Great Powers Balance against and When?“, in: Thazha V. Paul/James J. Wirtz/Michael Fortmann (Hg.): Balance of Power. Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Richard/Thompson, William (1975): „The ‚Coup Contagion‘ Hypothesis“, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19 (1), 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter (1943): U.S. Foreign Policy. Shield of the Republic, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J. (1990): „Back to the Future. Instability in Europe after the Cold War“, International Security, 15 (1), 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, Andreas (2003): „Legitime Gewaltoligopole – eine Antwort auf strukturelle Instabilität in Westafrika?“, Focus Afrika: IAK Diskussionsbeiträge, 22, Hamburg: Institut für Afrikakunde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, Ulrich (2003): „Comeback der drei Welten“, Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 12/2003, 1453–1461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S. (1988): Strong Societies and WeakStates. State-Society relations and State Capabilities in the Third World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, Herfried (2002): Die neuen Kriege, Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, Gunnar (1968): Asian Drama. An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Stephanie G. (1998): „International Relations Theory and the Third World. An Oxymoron?“, in: Stephanie G. Neuman (Hg.): International Relations Theory and the Third World, Houndmills et al.: Macmillan, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organski, Abramo F.K./Kugler, Jacek (1978): „Davids and Goliaths. Predicting the Outcomes of International Wars“, Comparative Political Studies, 11 (2), 141–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, James A. (2007): „Draining the Swamp: Democracy Promotion, State Failure, and Terrorism in 19 Middle Eastern Countries“, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 30 (6), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posen, Barry (1993): „The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict“, in: Michael E. Brown (Hg.): Ethnic Conflict and International Security, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, William (2000): „Shadow States and the Political Economy of Civil Wars“, in: Mats Berdal/David M. Malone (Hg.): Greed and Grievance. Economic Agendas in Civil Wars, Boulder, CO et al.: Lynne-Rienner, 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas/Lehmkuhl, Ursula (2007): „Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit. Anmerkungen zu konzeptionellen Problemen der gegenwärtigen Governance-Diskussion“, in: Marianne Beisheim/Gunnar F. Schuppert (Hg.): Staatszerfall und Governance, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 144–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, Robert I. (2004): „The Failure and Collapse of Nation-States. Breakdown, Prevention, and Repair“, in: Robert I. Rotberg (Hg.): When States Fail. Causes and Consequences, Princeton, NJ et al.: Princeton University Press, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothchild, Donald/Deng, Francis M./Zartman, Ira W./Kimaro, Sadikiel/Lyons, Terrence (1996): Sovereignty as Responsibility. Conflict Management in Africa, Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Hy S. (2007): „Less is More: The Problematic Future of Irregular Warfare in an Era of Collapsing States“, Third World Quarterly, 28 (2), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehyan, Idean/Gleditsch, Kristian S. (2006): „Refugees and the Spread of Civil War“, International Organization, 60 (2), 335–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, Katja (2005): Instabile Staatlichkeit am Beispiel Senegal: Rebellenkonflikte und die Handlungsautonomie des Staates, Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambanis, Nicholas (2001): „Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part I)“, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45 (3), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidl, Susanne (2002): „(Human) Security Dilemmas: Long-term Implications of the Afghan Refugee Crisis“, Third World Quarterly, 23 (1), 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidinger, Thomas (2006): „Tschad vs. Sudan: Plündern und Herrschen“, Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, 3/2006, 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, Ulrich (2006): „States at Risk: Zur Analyse fragiler Staatlichkeit“, in: Ulrich Schneckener (Hg.): Fragile Staatlichkeit. „States at Risk“ zwischen Stabilität und Scheitern, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 9–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Anna/Tucker, David (2007): „The Misleading Problem of Failed States. A ‚Socio- Geography‘ of Terrorism in the Post-9/11 Era“, Third World Quarterly, 28 (2), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steve (2000): „The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualizing Security in the Last Twenty Years“, in: Stuart Croft/Terry Terriff (Hg.): Critical Reflections on Security and Change, London et al.: Frank Cass, 72–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, Georg (2001): „War and State-Making. Why Doesn’t It Work in the Third World?“, Security Dialogue, 32 (3), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, Georg (2000): „States Are Not ‚Like Units‘: Types of State and Forms of Anarchy in the Present International System“, in: Matthias Albert/Lothar Brock/Klaus-Dieter Wolf (Hg.): Civilizing World Politics. Society and Community Beyond the State, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, John A. (1993): „Factors Related to the Contagion and Diffusion of International Violence“, in: Manus I. Midlarsky (Hg.): The Internationalization of Communal Strife, London et al.: Routledge, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waal, Alex d. (2000): Who Fights? Who Cares? War and Humanitarian Action in Africa, Trenton et al.: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979): Theory of International Politics, Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1959): Man, the State, and War. A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (19725) [1922]: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, William C./Little, Richard/Kaufman, Stuart J./Kang, David/Jones, Charles A./Hui, Victoria T.-B./Eckstein, Arthur/Deudney, Daniel/Brenner, William L. (2007): „Testing Balanceof- Power Theory in World History“, European Journal of International Relations, 13 (2), 155–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones, Richard (1999): Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, Boulder: Lynne-Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, Ira W. (1995): „Introduction. Posing the Problem of State Collapse“, in: Ira W. Zartman (Hg.): Collapsed States. The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority, Boulder: Lynne-Rienner, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politikwissenschaft, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg-Essen

    Dr. Daniel Lambach (wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter)

Authors
  1. Dr. Daniel Lambach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Internationale Politik und Außenpolitik, Universität zu Köln, Köln

    Thomas Jäger (Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Internationale Politik) (Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Internationale Politik)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lambach, D. (2010). Gefährliche Davids: Wie schwache Staaten ihre Nachbarn bedrohen. In: Jäger, T. (eds) Die Komplexität der Kriege. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92453-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92453-3_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17311-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92453-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation