Skip to main content

Kulturvergleichende Psychologie, indigene Psychologien und Kulturpsychologie: Eine harmonische oder disharmonische Familienbeziehung? Bemerkungen aus Sicht der Entwicklungspsychologie

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Zugegeben: Das Thema ist etwas störrisch formuliert. Aber eine „Familienmetapher“ für die Beziehung zwischen diesen drei psychologischen Ansätzen zu wählen, die sich alle auf den sozio-kulturellen Kontext beziehen, ist naheliegend und auch nicht neu. So sprechen z.B. Kim und Berry in ihrer Einleitung zu ihrem Buch „Indigenous Psychologies“ (1993) von der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie als dem „engsten Geschwister“ und der Kulturanthropologie als dem „nahesten Cousin“ der indigenen Psychologien. In diesen Vergleich beziehen sie zwar die Kulturpsychologie nicht ein, sehr wohl aber die Kulturanthropologie. Mein Ziel ist es, die Beziehung der drei kulturbasierten Ansätze in der Psychologie, der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie, der Kulturpsychologie und der indigenen Psychologien aus meiner Sicht zu diskutieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Acioli, N. (1994). La juste mesure: Une étude des compétences mathématiques des travailleurs de la canne à sucre du Nordeste du Brésil dans le domaine de la mesure. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Université René Descartes, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair, J. G. (2006). Creating indigenous psychologies: Insights from empirical social studies of the science of psychology. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 467–485). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch, C. G., & Billmann-Mahecha, E. (1990). Perspektiven der Kulturpsychologie. Heidelberg: Asanger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis (Special Issue). International Journal of Psychology, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Free will in scientific psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (Eds.). (1992). Crosscultural psychology: Research and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, N. (1981). Aristoteles, Galilei, Kurt Lewin und die Folgen. In W. Michaelis (Hrsg.), Bericht über den 32. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Zürich (Bd. 1, S. 17–39). Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (1971). Zwischen zwei Wirklichkeiten. Prolegomena zu einer ökologischen Psychologie. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (1976). Psychopathologie des Alltags – Zur Ökopsychologie des Handelns und seiner Störungen. Bern: Huber

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (1979). Kultur und Handlung. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, A. U., & Valsiner, J. (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 35–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1983). Studying individual differences in cognitive abilities: Implications for cross-cultural studies. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 213–235). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakkarath, P. (2005). What can western psychology learn from indigenous psychologies? Lessons from Hindu psychology. In W. Friedlmeier, P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development. The importance of cross-cultural research to the social sciences (pp. 32–51). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T., & Lonner, W. J. (1998). Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 29, 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, J. (2002). Cassirer, Ernst. Gesammelte Werke: Philosophie der symbolischen Formen: Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1988). Cross-cultural research in the socio-historical tradition. Human Development, 31, 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1990). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline? In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 273–335). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. A., & Sharp, D. W. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking: An exploration in experimental anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasen, P. R. (1975). Concrete operational development in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasen, P. R., & Heron, A. (1981). Cross-cultural tests of Piaget‘s theory. In H. C. Triandis & A. Heron (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 295–342). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasen, P. R., Dembele, B., Ettien, K., Kabarn, K., Kamagate, D., & Koffi, D. A. (1985). N’glouéle, l’intelligence chez les Baolé. Archives de Psychologie, 53, 293–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1968). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. In W. Dilthey (Hrsg.), Gesammelte Schriften: Die geistige Welt – Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens: Abhandlung zur Grundlegung der Geisteswissenschaften (Bd. 5, S. 139–240). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Originalarbeit erschienen 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, E. F. (1982). Literacy, cultural familiarity and „intelligence“ as determinants of story recall. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 274 – 291). San Francisco: W. H. Freemann & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1992). Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Originalarbeit erschienen 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1970). Methodenprobleme der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie. SSIP-Schriften: Saarbrücken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1978). Die Grenzen des ökologischen Ansatzes in der Psychologie. In C. F. Graumann (Hrsg.), Ökologische Perspektiven in der Psychologie (S. 49–76). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1979). A metamethodological evaluation of psychological theories from a cross-cultural perspective. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. J. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 255–275). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1990a). From cross-cultural to cultural psychology. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 1, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1990b). On the necessity of the culture concept in psychology: A view from cross-cultural psychology. In F. J. R. van de Vijver & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture: Current issues in cultural psychology (pp. 153–183). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1993). Zur Beziehung zwischen den Kategorien des Glaubens und der Religion in der Psychologie. In T. V. Gamkrelidze (Hrsg.), Beiträge zum Dialog der Wissenschaften aus den Partneruniversitäten Praha, Saarbrücken, Sofia, Tbilissi und Warszawa (S. 49–104). Tbilissi, Georgien: Universitätsdruck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1995). Activity or action: Two different roads towards an integration of culture into psychology? Culture & Psychology, 1, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (1996). Agency, action and culture: Three basic concepts for crosscultural psychology. In J. Pandey, D. Sinha, & D. P. S. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 72–102). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2002). Paradigms revisited: From incommensurability to respected complementarity. In H. Keller, Y. H. Poortinga, & A. Schölmerich (Eds.), Biology, culture and development: Integrating diverse perspectives (pp. 341–383). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H. (2003). Wanted: A contextualized psychology. A plea for cultural psychology based on action psychology. In T. S. Saraswathi (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in human development. Theory, research and applications (pp. 70–101). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H., & Keller, H. (1998). Menschenbilder und Entwicklungskonzepte. In H. Keller (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Entwicklungspsychologie (S. 11–56). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H., & Krewer, B. (1990). Kulturvergleich und Ökopsychologie. In L. Kruse, C. F. Graumann, & E. D. Lantermann (Hrsg.), Ökologische Psychologie: Ein Handbuch in Schlüsselbegriffen (S. 66–75). München: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H., Lonner, W. J., & Poortinga, Y. H. (Eds.). (1979). Cross-cultural contributions to psychology. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckensberger, L. H., & Zimba, R. (1997). The development of moral judgment. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 299–338). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. P. (1981). The comparative study of the development of moral judgement and reasoning. In R. H. Munroe, R. L. Munroe, & B. B. Whiting (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 501–528). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez, V. G. (1990). Indigenous psychologies. Quezon City, Philippines: Psychology Research and Training House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, L. (1935). Die Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Basel: Benno Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Manner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., Brewer, L. E., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, J., & Cole, M. (1967). The new mathematics and an old school. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Keats, D. (1980). Elements of intellectual competence: Judgments by Australian and Malay university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. (1968, February). Cognitive style among the Kpelle of Liberia. Paper presented at the meeting on cross-cultural cognitive studies of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L. D., & Goodwin, W. L. (1999). Measurement myths and misconceptions. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 408–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graumann, C.-F. (1980). Experiment, Statistik, Geschichte. Psychologische Rundschau, 31, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American Psychologist, 52, 1115–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture. Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P., & Bruner, J. (1966). Culture and cognitive growth. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, D. (1967). On cross-cultural studies as a naturalistic approach in psychology. Human Development, 10, 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B. (2007). From nonhuman to human mind. What changed and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, A., & Kroeger, E. (1981). Introduction to developmental psychology. In H. C. Triandis & A. Heron (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–15). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, S. H. (1979). The place of factor analysis in cross-cultural methodology and its contribution to cognitive theory. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. Lonner, & Y. H. Poort inga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 300–341). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, S. H. (1983). Testing in Africa and America: The search for routes. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human assessment and cultural factors (pp. 45–58). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (1980). Theoretical and systematic approaches in cross-cultural psychology. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 69–142). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (1990). Variables, systems and the problem of explanation. In F. J. R. van de Vijver & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture. Current issues in Cultural Psychology (pp. 115–130). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G., & Krewer, B. (1997). History of cross-cultural psychology and cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. Poortinga, & J. Panday (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 1–42). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttemann, G. (2006). Wilhelm Wundt: Der missverstandene Geisteswissenschaftler. In G. Jüttemann (Hrsg.), Wilhelm Wundts anderes Erbe: Ein Missverständnis löst sich auf (S. 13–30). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, D. M. (1982). Cultural basis of concepts of intelligence. A Chinese versus Australian comparison. In P. Sukontarsap, N. Yongsiri, P. Intasuwan, N. Jotiban, & C. Suvannathat (Eds.), Proceedings of the second Asian workshop on child and adolescent development (pp. 67–75). Bangkok: Burapasilpa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, H. (1997). Evolutionary approaches. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Basic processes and human development (2nd ed., pp. 215–256). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, T. (1981). Entwicklung und Widerspruch. Ein Vergleich zwischen Piagets genetischer Erkenntnistheorie und Hegels Dialektik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (1993). Introduction. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous Psychologies. Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 30–43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology: The transactional approach. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural Psychology. Understanding people in context (pp. 27–48). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds). (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology. Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissler, A. (2006). Weicher Naturalismus: Habermas und die Willensfreiheit (19. Januar 2006). Zugriff am 06.06.2009 http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/artikel/506/74432/text/

  • Kornadt, H.-J. (2002). Biology, culture and childrearing: The development of social motives. In H. Keller, Y. H. Poortinga, & A. Schölmerich (Eds.), Biology, culture and development: Integrating diverse perspectives (pp. 191–211). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kornadt, H.-J. (2007). Motivation im kulturellen Kontext. In G. Trommsdorff & H.-J. Kornadt (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C. Theorie und Forschung: Serie VII. Kulturvergleichende Psychologie: Band 2. Erleben und Handeln im kulturellen Kontext (S. 283–376). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krewer, B. (1990). Psyche and culture – Can a culture-free psychology take into account the essential features of the species homo sapiens? Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognitive Development, 12, 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krewer, B. (1992). Kulturelle Identität und menschliche Selbsterforschung. Saarbrücken: Verlag Breitenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krewer, B. (1993). Kulturpsychologie der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie. Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie Saarbrücken: Fachbereich Sozial- und Umweltwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krewer, B., & Jahoda, G. (1990). On the scope of Lazarus and Steinthal’s „Voelkerpsychologie“ as reflected in the „Zeitschrift für Voelkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft“ (1860-1890). The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, F. (1915). Über Entwicklungspsychologie: Ihre sachliche und geschichtliche Notwendigkeit: Bd. (1,1). Arbeiten zur Entwicklungspsychologie. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (1992). Kultur als ‚externe Seele‘ – eine semiotisch-ökologische Perspektive. In C. G. Allesch, E. Billmann-Mahecha, & A. Lang (Hrsg.), Psychologische Aspekte des kulturellen Wandels (S. 9–30). Wien: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, M., & Steinthal, H. (1860/1997). Einleitende Gedanken über Völkerpsychologie, als Einladung zu einer Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft. In G. Eckardt (Hrsg.), Völkerpsychologie. Versuch einer Neuentdeckung. Texte von Lazarus, Steinthal und Wundt (S. 127–202). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • LCHC, Laboratory of comparative human cognition (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child development/ (Vol. 1, pp. 295–356). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1930). Der Übergang von der aristotelischen zur galileischen Denkweise in Biologie und Psychologie. Erkenntnis, 1, 421–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B. (1999). Do we have free will? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonner, W. (2007). Das Aufkommen und die fortdauernde Bedeutung der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie. In G. Trommsdorff & H.-J. Kornadt (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C. Theorie und Forschung: Serie VII. Kulturvergleichende Psychologie: Band 1. Theorien und Methoden der kulturvergleichenden Psychologie (S. 97–117). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, W. (2006). Wundts programmatisches Erbe. In G. Jüttemann (Hrsg.), Wilhelm Wundts anderes Erbe. Ein Missverständnis löst sich auf (S. 232–243). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R. S., & Poortinga, Y. H, (1986). Strategies for design and analysis. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 47–83). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (2000). Das ist Biologie: Die Wissenschaft des Lebens. Heidelberg: Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R. C. (2006). Indian perspectives on cognition. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology. Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R. C., Dasen, R. P., & Niraula, S. (2003). Ecology, language and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlmann, W. E. (1986). Geschichte der Anthropologie. Aula-Verlag: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. H., & Liu, J. H. (2000). Cultural revolution in psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nsamenang, A. B. (1992). Human development in cultural context: A third world perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ombredane, A. (1954). L’exploration de la mentalité des noirs congolais au moyen d’une épreuve projective. Le Congo T. A. T. Brussels: Institut Royale Colonial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C (1998). The structured assessment of personality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 150–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. (1985). Gesammelte Schriften: Schriften zur Soziologie und Sozialphilosophie (Bd. 10). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Malpass, R. S. (1986). Making inferences from cross-cultural data. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 17–46). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Joe, R. C., & van de Koppel, J. M. H. (1987). Peeling the onion called culture: A synopsis. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 22–34). Lisse: Swetz & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price-Williams, D. (1980). Toward the idea of a cultural psychology: A superordinate theme for study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampal, A. (2003). Counting on everyday mathematics. In T. S. Saraswathi (Ed.), Crosscultural perspectives in human development: Theory, research and applications (pp. 326–353). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, H. W., & Overton, W. F. (1970). Models of development and theories of development. In L. R. Goulet & P. B. Baltes (Eds), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp.115-145). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, F., Rosen, K., Ujiie, T., & Uchida, N. (2002). Family systems theory, attachment theory and culture. Family Process, 41, 328–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychlak, J. F. (1993). A suggested principle of complementarity for psychology. In theory, not method. American Psychologist Association, 48, 933–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. B., & Moylan, T. (1982). The development of measurement operations among the Oksapmin of Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 53, 1242–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). Everyday cognition. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Basic processes and human development (2nd ed., pp. 177–216). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. D. (1995). Philosophie und Psychologie. Trennungsgeschichte, Dogmen und Perspektiven. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. (1979). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking. Culture and logic reconsidered. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 223–243). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (Eds.). (1990). Human behavior in global perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, R. (1979). How specific are perceptual skills? A cross-cultural study of pattern reproduction. Bristish Journal of Psychology, 70, 365–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural Psychology: What is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, W. (2006). Interview mit W. Singer: „Der freie Wille ist nur ein gutes Gefühl“ (25. April 2006). Zugriff am 06.06.2009 http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/668/317542/text

  • Sinha, D. (1969). Indian villages in transition: A motivational analysis. New Delhi: Associating Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, D. (1993). Indigenization of psychology in India and its relevance. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 30–43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, D., & Chaubey, N. P. (1972). Achievement motive and rural economic development. International Journal of Psychology, 7, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. R. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1963). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E. (1920). Problem der Kulturpsychologie. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 75, 265–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, J. (2006). Understanding cultural differences: Relational hermeneutics and comparative analysis in cultural psychology. In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kölble, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning: Advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 163–213). Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L. (1964). Considerations of meta-method in cross-cultural studies. In A. K. Romney & R. C. D. Andrade (Eds.), Transcultural studies in cognition (pp. 223–229). Washington: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, G. (2007). Entwicklung im kulturellen Kontext. In G. Trommsdorff & H.-J. Kornadt (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C. Theorie und Forschung: Serie VII. Kulturvergleichende Psychologie: Bd. 2. Erleben und Handeln im kulturellen Kontext (S. 435–519). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children‘s action. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1990). A taxonomy of cultural differences. In F. J. R. van de Vijver & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture: Current issues in cultural psychology (pp. 91–114). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann, J. (1993). Der kognitive Aufbruch in der Ethnologie. In J. Wassmann & P. R. Dasen (Hrsg.), Alltagswissen: Der kognitive Ansatz im interdisziplinären Dialog (S. 71–98). Freiburg: Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.). (1985). Culture, communication and cognition. Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1959). The evolution of culture: The development of civilization to the fall of Rome. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wober, M. (1966). Sensotypes. Journal of Social Psychology, 70, 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wober, M. (1969). Distinguishing centri-cultural from cross-cultural tests and research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wober, M. (1974). Towards an understanding of the Kiganda concept of intelligence. In J. W. Berry & P. R. Dasen (Eds.), Culture and cognition: Readings in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 261–280). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1888). Über Ziele und Wege der Völkerpsychologie. Philosophische Studien, 4, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1908). Logik: Eine Untersuchung der Prinzipien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden wissenschaftlicher Forschung: Bd. 3. Logik der Geisteswissenschaften (3. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1918). Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythos und Sitte: Bd. 9. Das Recht. Leipzig: Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Boris Mayer Hans-Joachim Kornadt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eckensberger, L.H. (2010). Kulturvergleichende Psychologie, indigene Psychologien und Kulturpsychologie: Eine harmonische oder disharmonische Familienbeziehung? Bemerkungen aus Sicht der Entwicklungspsychologie. In: Mayer, B., Kornadt, HJ. (eds) Psychologie – Kultur – Gesellschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92212-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92212-6_8

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16696-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92212-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics